The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 4:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:55 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
I'm suprised no one's posted this...

Quote:
BARACK Obama has become the first US president to support same-sex marriage, ending speculation about where he stands on the issue in an election year.


Spoiler:
The Democrat President said today he had concluded after talking to friends, family, neighbours and members of his staff who were in same-sex relationships that gay marriage should be permitted.

"At a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married,” Mr Obama said in an interview with US-based ABC News.

The President’s position is a change-about after he had previously voiced opposition same-sex marriage but said his views were “evolving”.

An endorsement for same-sex marriage from the President is an important milestone for the US gay and lesbian community.

Recommended Coverage. .Strong reaction to Obama's gay stance GAY rights groups cheered Barack Obama's announcement that he supports same-sex marriage, but conservatives swiftly denounced his landmark stance. ..Obama supports same-sex marriage.

Mr Obama’s stated position comes several days after Vice President Joe Biden fanned speculation about the White House view by confirming he was “absolutely comfortable” with gay couples who marry gaining the same civil rights as heterosexuals.

The President’s comments are in line with opinion polls that show a majority of Americans now support same-sex marriage.

But he is likely to face a public backlash from social conservatives, especially evangelical Christians and the Catholic Church hierarchy, who remain opposed to same-sex marriage.

“I’ve been going through an evolution on this issue. I’ve always been adamant that gay and lesbian Americans should be treated fairly and equally,” Mr Obama said.

Mr Obama’s comments come a day after North Carolina became the 29th state to ban gay marriage with a referendum question amending the state’s constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Same-sex marriage has been made legal in states including California and New York.

The likely Republican presidential challenger in this year’s election, Mitt Romney, supported gay rights as a moderate one-term governor of Massachusetts but he has lent his support to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage if elected in November


Linky

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-dept ... 6351575041


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:59 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
Just when the dems had the election mostly wrapped up ....

That pretty much screwed them. I support same sex unions/marriage but am pragmatic enough to know that was about the stupidest thing he could have done tactically


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
He could have said he supported civil unions or equal rights and been fine. By saying he supports marriage specifically, he's just feeding the fears of all the people who think that legalized gay marriage means something akin to the Civil Rights Act where churches will be forced to perform gay marriages.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
I think it's good. He's come around to the Dick Cheney position on gay marriage. He's been saying he supports civil unions and equal rights for a while, but was "evolving". He looked like an idiot. He was pressured into saying what he actually believes.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 8:06 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
TheRiov wrote:
Just when the dems had the election mostly wrapped up ....

I am of the opinion that most people opposed to gay marriage wouldn't actually vote for Obama, anyway. That's a conservative view and he's not a conservative candidate. This will end up as a net positive and history will look favorably on his decision.

... and don't bring up the large amount of black/hispanic people that are against gay marriage. They'll STILL vote Barack over Mittens.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Glad he finally got to this point.

Now if only the rest of the country would get a clue.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 8:52 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
I'm thrilled to be able to say that I am finally able to agree on something with my President.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
It seems to me like he's still hedging on this issue, (saying the states should figure out the legality of it) at least the excerpt I heard.

I also find it hard to believe the same person who wants to force Catholic institutions to pay (directly or indirectly) for birth control will not force Catholics and others to perform non-traditional marriage ceremonies. I could be wrong.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:06 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Lenas wrote:
TheRiov wrote:
Just when the dems had the election mostly wrapped up ....

I am of the opinion that most people opposed to gay marriage wouldn't actually vote for Obama, anyway. That's a conservative view and he's not a conservative candidate. This will end up as a net positive and history will look favorably on his decision.

... and don't bring up the large amount of black/hispanic people that are against gay marriage. They'll STILL vote Barack over Mittens.


Hell I would vote for a pair of mittens (literally) over him. :)

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Rorinthas wrote:
I also find it hard to believe the same person who wants to force Catholic institutions to pay (directly or indirectly) for birth control will not force Catholics and others to perform non-traditional marriage ceremonies. I could be wrong.


Businesses are not people.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:36 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
I fail to see how that applies.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 9:44 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
The first amendment simply says congress can't pass a law preventing the free exercise of religion. It doesn't say anything about individuals or businesses. The executive, in the powers given it under the affordable care, act are limiting the free exercise of religion by those individuals running, funding and participating in the organization by forcing them to provide a service they find objectionable or face a penalty.

Its the same idea as forcing the people in these organizations to preform marriages that oppose their religious ideals. My Pastor only marries people of like faith that he counsels and approves. This is a bigger pool of people he doesn't wish to marry than practicing homosexuals. As I've said before this is about a bigger issue.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 11:12 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Rorinthas wrote:
As I've said before this is about a bigger issue.


It has become apparent that for a lot of people, this is all about proclaiming one's righteousness and professing how pro-equality one is in as public a manner as can be afforded by said individual.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 1:18 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Aizle wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
I also find it hard to believe the same person who wants to force Catholic institutions to pay (directly or indirectly) for birth control will not force Catholics and others to perform non-traditional marriage ceremonies. I could be wrong.


Businesses are not people.

So you are asserting that individuals who utilize their right to peaceably assemble and associate forfeit their First Amendment rights by doing so?

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:35 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Rafael wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
As I've said before this is about a bigger issue.


It has become apparent that for a lot of people, this is all about proclaiming one's righteousness and professing how pro-equality one is in as public a manner as can be afforded by said individual.

maybe so. I'm not one of them. All sex and sexual desire outside the one man one woman for life marriage is sin, and that makes me ( and pretty much every one whose ever lived) as guilty as any homosexual. Only difference is I'm spared the death penalty by God's grace and because of that I want to by That same grace, do better. I'm not there yet trust me.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:55 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Rorinthas wrote:
The first amendment simply says congress can't pass a law preventing the free exercise of religion. It doesn't say anything about individuals or businesses. The executive, in the powers given it under the affordable care, act are limiting the free exercise of religion by those individuals running, funding and participating in the organization by forcing them to provide a service they find objectionable or face a penalty.

Its the same idea as forcing the people in these organizations to preform marriages that oppose their religious ideals. My Pastor only marries people of like faith that he counsels and approves. This is a bigger pool of people he doesn't wish to marry than practicing homosexuals. As I've said before this is about a bigger issue.


It doesn't matter even if the government forces them to perform same-sex marriages. A priest can perform a legally-binding marriage without it being a church-blessed/sanctioned marriage.

In most religions (I can't say all cause there are some weird-ass cults out there) there are two components to a marriage, the portion that makes it a legally-binding contract between two individuals and a seperate spiritual portion and they can and do perform either piece at their discretion currently.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:05 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Im happy that the Office of the President has come out in support of this. Now I just hope the individual currently occupying the position believes it because its right instead of because its politically advantageous.

As to the demographics that have.supported amendment 1 in NC and overturned props in California.... lets be honest- they are going to vote for him regardless of his stance. This move (IMO) is to court the slipping independent vote.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:22 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
I still don't think it's right to foist even the civil part on objecting Pastors. Sounds like a cop-out akin to saying the health insurance companies are paying for the contraceptives. It's still getting provided and infringing on the Pastor's right to choose. (I thought you guys thought that was a good thing.)

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:33 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
This is a slippery slope that may or may not have merit. Canada has allowed gay marriage for a decade and churches/priests are not obligated to perform one against their will. Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future results.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:44 am 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
http://www.soulforce.org/resources/what ... sexuality/

Lengthy article, but good read, even if you still disagree at the end.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:51 am 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Is this the first issue the President believes is a state matter? When did he stop believing in the Federal government's power?

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:51 am 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Also kinda of embarrassing given that N.Carolina just banned it and the DNC conference is in NC this year.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Talya wrote:
This is a slippery slope that may or may not have merit. Canada has allowed gay marriage for a decade and churches/priests are not obligated to perform one against their will. Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Also, the US is famously more litigious and entitlement-minded than Canada these days. You guys are just too polite for your gays to push the Church.

And, rofflecopters, Fester.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:02 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
^This. You Canadians pull off a lot of things don't just wouldn't work here.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:06 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Not a big surprise. He was for it, then against it, then against it again...and now for it. The not a big surprise is that he is making a big deal out of this to distract from you know, his horrible, horrible run at being president. Lot's of polls show that social issues like this are not big on the populance's radar. It's like the fake "War on Women" that the Dems and leftys have been pushing to distract folks from the horrible economy, unemployment still over 8%, etc.

The sooner we get this idiot out of office, the sooner we can start fixing things. There are more important things to worry about in this country.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 227 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group