Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
There are a few questions that need to be asked:
Are their complaints things that are worthy of complaining about?
They are legitimate issues, yes - however, complaining solves nothing so I would argue that nothing is worthy of complaining about.
Ok, first of all, are they complaining or are they *****?
***** is good - it's a way of blowing off steam and reducing stress. ***** can usually be identified because it relates to complaints that are legitimate, but are also just part of the cost of doing business, or are too minor to really warrant serious effort to fix. Soldiers, for example, may ***** that the Sergeant Major doesn't allow them to walk across the HQ lawn. While this is petty and silly of him, it's generally a pretty minor issue.
Complaining is when there's an issue that really does warrant effort to fix. It may still be minor, but the defining factor is that there would be a nontrivial improvement to the organization from resolving the issue.
First, complaining obviously solves nothing in and of itself, but it can raise awareness of an issue so that a solution can be found. Generally, most things that get complained (rather than *****) about
are worth complaining about. However, it's fair to expect that the complaining itself not become constant or burdensome. If complaining about something becomes excessive, the thing to do is not to tell people not to be "negative"; there's nothing wrong with being negative about things that are negative. We call that realism. The thing to do with excessive complainers is ask them for a (realistic) solution. If they have one, great. If not, the thing to do may be to assign them to come up with a realistic solution before further complaints are entertained.
Second, if they can't come up with a solution (note that asking them to implement the solution is not the same thing; generally that's someone higher ups job than the complainer. If the complainer were the proper person to implement, it would have already happened), find out why. The answer may be that they just don't want to because they like to complain. In that case you're either dealing with *****, or you're dealing with a truly negative person, not just a person who is being negative. Negative people need to be neutralized somehow.
If they can't come up with a solution because their solutions are impractical, they don't understand the underlying or peripheral issues well enough, lack experience, or any of a myriad of other issues, then that probably means that someone else needs to be addressing the problem.
It's reasonable to tell people to quit their complaining becuase you're tired of hearing about it, but not becuase "complaining doesn't solve anything". That's not its purpose. The reason for complaining is issue identification, and just because someone identifies a problem does not automatically make it their job to solve it.
For example, let's say people are consistently getting paid 3 or 4 days late. Telling them not to complain about this because "complaining doesn't solve anything" is bad because that's how you find out there's a consistent pay problem, and also because it tells people you think "negativity" is somehow worse than not getting paid on time. It also would be unfair to tell someone who doesn't handle pay to solve the problem. You have a personnel department for that (even if the personnel department is the boss). Tell them to solve it. Then tell everyone else it's being addressed, and quit complaining about it so much.