Tangu Matraa wrote:
That's absurd. Great job teaching the brightest among us to strive for the mundane and mediocre, though. What the US needs more than anything else is a bunch of IT guys and middle management with 160 IQs, I'm sure. I mean, for what reasons could we possibly want to teach our best and our brightest to be assertive and seek more challenging work. If the adults involved have prevented the child from being challenged, and instead have confined him to the mundane and mediocre, then they have already failed him so terribly that they deserve absolutely no say in further curiculum.
What's absurd is pretty much this entire line of reasoning. Nothing I said indicated anything at all about "striving for the mediocre". This is a matter of children, regardless of intelligence, being children (or adolescents). They are not in a position to decide what work they will and will not do. If you allow them to decide that any time anything is not "challenging" enough for them, that they don't have to do it, all you are doing is creating a self-centered little know-it-all that not only isn't getting the challenging education they need, they aren't getting even a mediocre education. You won't have an IT specialist with a 160 IQ; you'll be lucky to have a McDonald's clerk because the moment anything isn't "interesting" or "challenging" enough they feel they're too special to do it.
A child that has been allowed to get away with poor habits like skipping school and not turning in assignments when things are easy will continue those habits when things are more difficult. That situation can be arrested by giving them more challenging and interesting work, but in order for that to work, the child must first understand that they are expected to
do the work. That kid has doubtless found more entertaining passtimes when they were supposed to be studying, and the allure of whatever that entertainment is; TV, video games, hanging out and smoking marijuana, **** their girlfriend or boyfriend, or playing football, will still be there.
Without learning self-discipline, it doesn't matter if you challenge the kid. They will ignore your challenge and go right on cutting class because that's the behavior they learned. Furthermore, the many, many kids that do not have some phenomenal IQ and for whom this supposedly mediocre material is challenging will see the smart kid getting away with this, and want to do the same thing.
Smart kids need challenging material. They also need to learn to scrub toilets, do busywork, and put up with bullshit like everyone else. If they won't learn that, their IQ is useless. Boot them and give the attention to the average kid, or even the somewhat-above-average kid that knows how to work.