The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Hopwin wrote:
Celebrity endorsements would literally drive elections.

You say that as if they don't already. Unless you're going to seriously suggest to me that Romney's success wasn't driven by Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck, and cable news anchors commentary about being "electable"...

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Lenas wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't feel like being forced to have an opinion....

That's fine. Abstain, but go on the record as such.


Go on the record? So you don't want voting to be anonymous either?

That's terrible.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:30 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Jesus Christ. That's not what I'm saying. How are votes tracked right now to ensure that people don't submit twice? That system doesn't need to change. Just proof that you either voted in person or submitted a ballot.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:39 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Lenas wrote:
Jesus Christ. That's not what I'm saying. How are votes tracked right now to ensure that people don't submit twice? That system doesn't need to change. Just proof that you either voted in person or submitted a ballot.

We can't even keep the dead from voting. Your optimism about the competence and ability of government is staggering. What have they ever done so well and has inspired this in you?

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Call me an optimist, I guess. Ultimately maybe a little naive or idealistic, but hey, I prefer to be happy. I don't like the idea that the government can't ever get anything right, because I'm part of it, and its failures are an extension of my failures (or society's failures). At one point we had our **** together. I'd like to think we're never that far off from getting it back together.

When I'm presented with a new idea, I try to see all the benefits that can come of it. I feel like people immediately look for situations where an idea wouldn't (or "couldn't") work, but a lot of the time it's self-defeating cynicism behind some of the rationale.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:01 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Lenas wrote:
Call me an optimist, I guess. Ultimately maybe a little naive or idealistic, but hey, I prefer to be happy. I don't like the idea that the government can't ever get anything right, because I'm part of it, and its failures are an extension of my failures (or society's failures). At one point we had our **** together. I'd like to think we're never that far off from getting it back together.

Oh, I'm sure it could under the right conditions, but it never will because the biggest successes come from the best experimentation, and we disallow the massive majority of experimentation when we federalize and centralize. In short, we don't allow those conditions to exist.


Quote:
When I'm presented with a new idea, I try to see all the benefits that can come of it. I feel like you guys immediately look for situations where an idea wouldn't (or "couldn't") work, but a lot of the times I feel like it's self-defeating cynicism behind some of the rationale.

It's called due diligence and best practices.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:07 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
You don't put a man on the moon by just launching **** up into space. You do have to ask yourself what wouldn't, and what couldn't work before you start putting people into rockets and firing them off.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:10 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Rynar wrote:
Lenas wrote:
NephyrS wrote:
Yes. I think the only thing that would change is people not giving a **** and then voting randomly, instead of not giving a **** and not voting at all.


I don't think that's very realistic. If people were forced to vote, they would at least find out which candidate suited them best. If they really didn't want to vote, you could always abstain just as you do now. The entire ideal behind it, though, is that a person needs to speak for themselves versus a rep speaking for them via proxy. I'm tired of the self-defeating rhetoric of someone not voting because "it wont matter".

This woman has been legislatively mandated to wear clothing. Do you feel she educated herself and made the best decision?
Image


I would love to put this in the quotes thread, but it's worthless without the pic.

That said, I think the results of her not wearing clothing would be worse.

edit - **** it, in it goes.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Last edited by Diamondeye on Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:14 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Corolinth wrote:
You don't put a man on the moon by just launching **** up into space. You do have to ask yourself what wouldn't, and what couldn't work before you start putting people into rockets and firing them off.


Actually, you don't even get to the point of firing rockets off without asking those questions.. well, you might, but you won't really be firing them all that far off.

I think all single adults of age 30 without children should have to adopt as well.

I'm all in for the mandatory firearms purchase as well. Everyone should be required to own a long arm and a handgun. There should be an additional penalty for failing to carry it in public. And another for not buying a box of ammo for each monthly, and another for not firing it. Revenue can go for the prisons, and to buy guns for Americans that can't afford theur own, although I hear we have plenty of free ones we're sending to Mexico already.,

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Hopwin wrote:
Hannibal wrote:
I'm about to mandate the purchase of a sig 226

How does that handle? I wanted one but couldn't locate locally so I got a Glock 17 (which fits me like a glove).

Oh and I want a wind mill too.


I own a 9mm P226 (just sold it, as it was a collectible West German made with a mandrel forged slide) and a 40S&W P226. Ergos on 226 outright destroy the Glock, the Glock having the Luger angle grip. Glock wins just about everywhere else ... firepower, durability, cost effectiveness, sheer ruggedness. Sig might be a shade more reliable.

Either way, if you get a 226, get Mec-Gar magazines.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Diamondeye wrote:
I'm all in for the mandatory firearms purchase as well. Everyone should be required to own a long arm and a handgun. There should be an additional penalty for failing to carry it in public. And another for not buying a box of ammo for each monthly, and another for not firing it. Revenue can go for the prisons, and to buy guns for Americans that can't afford theur own, although I hear we have plenty of free ones we're sending to Mexico already.,


Have you ever been to Switzerland? There's not much that's more nerve wracking than being in a packed coffee shop where every single patron is carrying at least two guns, including their army-issued rifle.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Xequecal wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
I'm all in for the mandatory firearms purchase as well. Everyone should be required to own a long arm and a handgun. There should be an additional penalty for failing to carry it in public. And another for not buying a box of ammo for each monthly, and another for not firing it. Revenue can go for the prisons, and to buy guns for Americans that can't afford theur own, although I hear we have plenty of free ones we're sending to Mexico already.,


Have you ever been to Switzerland? There's not much that's more nerve wracking than being in a packed coffee shop where every single patron is carrying at least two guns, including their army-issued rifle.

In what way is it nerve wracking?

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Rynar wrote:
In what way is it nerve wracking?


You wouldn't consider it intimidating to meet a random stranger with a rifle slung over their shoulder, in a place where there's really no reason to be carrying it? OK, maybe you wouldn't, but the average person would. Remember the Tea Party protests of Obama? People who carried rifles to those got accused of using intimidation tactics and making implies threats just for carrying the weapon. I don't believe either of those, but you have to admit that the fact that they were accused of such by even the mainstream media means the average person would be severely intimidated by that kind of situation.

Also in Switzerland, while they're allowed to carry guns, they're not allowed to keep them loaded. So you get the fear that any one of these people clearly has the means to shoot up the place, and the rest of the law-abiding customers would not be able to respond.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:03 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Xequecal wrote:
Rynar wrote:
In what way is it nerve wracking?


You wouldn't consider it intimidating to meet a random stranger with a rifle slung over their shoulder, in a place where there's really no reason to be carrying it? OK, maybe you wouldn't, but the average person would. Remember the Tea Party protests of Obama? People who carried rifles to those got accused of using intimidation tactics and making implies threats just for carrying the weapon. I don't believe either of those, but you have to admit that the fact that they were accused of such by even the mainstream media means the average person would be severely intimidated by that kind of situation.

I don't have to kowtow to the illogical. Switzerland has far and away the lowest gun crime rate in the world. It's foolish that anyone would be worried about being shot there.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:48 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Xequecal wrote:
Rynar wrote:
In what way is it nerve wracking?


You wouldn't consider it intimidating to meet a random stranger with a rifle slung over their shoulder, in a place where there's really no reason to be carrying it? OK, maybe you wouldn't, but the average person would. Remember the Tea Party protests of Obama? People who carried rifles to those got accused of using intimidation tactics and making implies threats just for carrying the weapon. I don't believe either of those, but you have to admit that the fact that they were accused of such by even the mainstream media means the average person would be severely intimidated by that kind of situation.

Also in Switzerland, while they're allowed to carry guns, they're not allowed to keep them loaded. So you get the fear that any one of these people clearly has the means to shoot up the place, and the rest of the law-abiding customers would not be able to respond.


This isn't meant to come across to sound like an ***, but you did admit previously you'd be too afraid to do anything to stop someone else who was in the act of actively sodomizing or hypothetically "[beating] to death" 8 year old boys. You admitted this despite both being a younger, stronger athlete than said man (as McQueary was and is to Sandusky) and having the element of surprise so as to be able to procure an improvised weapon.

You admitted this and furthermore admitted that you'd also potentially not testify or report the actions of the above man for fear of irreparably damaging your own career and inventing some scenario where you would be "character assassinated" by society to justify your failure to report such an event.

I'm not exactly sure that your level of fear should be a good barometer for prohibiting gun carry as if fear were a good reason to do that anyhow.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
I didn't say anything about prohibiting gun carrying, I find gun control to be pretty stupid myself. I was replying to DE's post where he said he would require people to carry guns. People are afraid of guns. That's why it's a bad idea.

Also, there's a big difference between "don't report something at all" and "report it to the entity I'm required to report it to by my employment contract," which is what I actually said.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Xequecal wrote:
I didn't say anything about prohibiting gun carrying, I find gun control to be pretty stupid myself. I was replying to DE's post where he said he would require people to carry guns. People are afraid of guns. That's why it's a bad idea.

I wonder how many people in Switzerland are afraid of guns?

How many nineteenth century Americans, say, in Nebraska do you think were afraid of guns?

If lots of Americans are afraid of guns, it's only because we've been trying to push them out of our daily lives.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:36 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
To be fair, I trust guns. I don't generally trust people with guns in everyday society. They're force multipliers, and most folk I don't hold in high enough esteem to trust their force to be multiplied.

Kaffis wrote:
If lots of Americans are afraid of guns, it's only because we've been trying to push them out of our daily lives.

Also to be fair, daily lives were here first. Guns came later.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 12:28 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Guns are just an advancement in rock throwing.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 1:52 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
FarSky wrote:
To be fair, I trust guns. I don't generally trust people with guns in everyday society. They're force multipliers, and most folk I don't hold in high enough esteem to trust their force to be multiplied.

Kaffis wrote:
If lots of Americans are afraid of guns, it's only because we've been trying to push them out of our daily lives.

Also to be fair, daily lives were here first. Guns came later.

Yeah. Same as... well... everything else in most people's lives today.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 6:59 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Rafael wrote:

I own a 9mm P226 (just sold it, as it was a collectible West German made with a mandrel forged slide) and a 40S&W P226. Ergos on 226 outright destroy the Glock, the Glock having the Luger angle grip. Glock wins just about everywhere else ... firepower, durability, cost effectiveness, sheer ruggedness. Sig might be a shade more reliable.

Either way, if you get a 226, get Mec-Gar magazines.


I want aesthetically pleasing, which is why Im looking at the Sig. I carried a g27 for years and while I absolutely trust glock to go bang every time the ergonomics on it didn't fit me. I like the natural pointing I got with the Sig. Good call on the mags. While they are a bit spendy that's another area I wont skimp on. Any ammo recommendations or any to keep away from?

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
Pretty much any brand name self defense round is going to be good (they're all very similar in terms of muzzle velocity, penetration, expansion, etc). I like Federal Hydra-Shok. Speer Gold Dots are really good, as well. Whichever you end up going with, make sure you shoot a couple hundred through your gun to make sure they function properly in it. Some guns just don't like some kinds of ammunition for whatever reason.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
I like gold dots personally. I was just wondering if RAF had any types he found functioned poorly.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 1:34 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Xequecal wrote:
Rynar wrote:
In what way is it nerve wracking?


You wouldn't consider it intimidating to meet a random stranger with a rifle slung over their shoulder, in a place where there's really no reason to be carrying it? OK, maybe you wouldn't, but the average person would. Remember the Tea Party protests of Obama? People who carried rifles to those got accused of using intimidation tactics and making implies threats just for carrying the weapon. I don't believe either of those, but you have to admit that the fact that they were accused of such by even the mainstream media means the average person would be severely intimidated by that kind of situation.

Also in Switzerland, while they're allowed to carry guns, they're not allowed to keep them loaded. So you get the fear that any one of these people clearly has the means to shoot up the place, and the rest of the law-abiding customers would not be able to respond.



You're idea of "no reason" does not mean no reason. It simply means its an action you don't understand.

You're freaking paranoid. I've been surrounded by people who were upset and were carrying loaded rifles and handguns. Never felt ill at ease. You want to regulate everyone to the standards of the most nervous nelly around (in this case you). How **** up is that?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:34 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Xequecal wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
I'm all in for the mandatory firearms purchase as well. Everyone should be required to own a long arm and a handgun. There should be an additional penalty for failing to carry it in public. And another for not buying a box of ammo for each monthly, and another for not firing it. Revenue can go for the prisons, and to buy guns for Americans that can't afford theur own, although I hear we have plenty of free ones we're sending to Mexico already.,


Have you ever been to Switzerland? There's not much that's more nerve wracking than being in a packed coffee shop where every single patron is carrying at least two guns, including their army-issued rifle.


What do you think it's like in the coffee shop in Iraq when you're deployed? Why did this bother you? Evidently the Swiss aren't bothered by it, nor shooting each other at random. The nerve-wracking is something wrong with you, not with them.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 251 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group