The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 10:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 47  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Foamy wrote:
Maybe your definition of racism differs from mine, but I don't think a person who hates black people simply because they are black would speak out against the police who beat up on a BLACK person.

You keep missing my statements that racism isn't limited to hate, so yes, I think we're operating on different definitions. To illustrate what I'm talking about, let me offer some hypothetical scenarios. In each one, imagine that the person in question genuinely has no hatred whatsoever for black people and fully believes that many, many black people are perfectly good, honest, hard-working individuals. Nevertheless, the person in question does the following things:

1. He's a cab driver, and he refuses to pick up black people, because they're statistically more likely to rob him.
2. He's a cop, and he deliberately targets black people for stop-and-frisks, traffic stops, etc., because they're statistically more likely to have drugs in their possession.
3. He's a landlord, and he does his best to avoid renting to black people, because they're statistically more likely to damage the apartment and/or fail to pay rent.
4. He's an employer, and he takes extra security precautions with black employees, because they're statistically more likely to steal things.
5. He's a father, and he forbids his daughter from dating black guys, because they're statistically more likely to cheat on her.
6. He's a city-dweller, and he gets nervous/suspicious whenever he sees black people walking on his street, because they're statistically more likely to be criminals.

Would you consider any or all of the above "racist"? If not, is there a different term you think is better? They're all motivated purely by statistical risk analysis, not hatred, but surely you agree that doesn't make them hunky-dory.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:22 am
Posts: 385
RangerDave wrote:
So, if Martin had been a white guy in a hoodie, Zimmerman wouldn't have been suspicious, and Martin would still be alive. How is that not racism?


Actually during interrogation it seemed pretty established that Zimmerman would have responded the same if Martin was white. In fact, it seemed like some time passed before Zimmerman even knew what color he was.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:18 am 
Offline
Lucky Bastard
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:11 am
Posts: 2341
RD:

I would agree that all of your examples are racist.

That being said, as you used #6 to parallel this case, #6 is NOT what transpired. I am done repeating myself and the examples that both myself and numerous others have pointed out showing that GZ did not act on based on seeing a black person.

Had he acted as such, then yes, he could be classified as a racist. What I have repeated overandoverandoverandover is that his suspicions were based on the history of robberies/break-ins and the observed actions of the (colorless, as observed initially by GZ) person at that time of night, in the rain, in a gated community.

You seem hopelessly fixated on the fact that GZ only acted based on observed skin color and I don't see anything else myself or anyone can say to convince you otherwise.

_________________
This must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:22 am
Posts: 385
RangerDave wrote:
Foamy wrote:
Maybe your definition of racism differs from mine, but I don't think a person who hates black people simply because they are black would speak out against the police who beat up on a BLACK person.

You keep missing my statements that racism isn't limited to hate, so yes, I think we're operating on different definitions. To illustrate what I'm talking about, let me offer some hypothetical scenarios. In each one, imagine that the person in question genuinely has no hatred whatsoever for black people and fully believes that many, many black people are perfectly good, honest, hard-working individuals. Nevertheless, the person in question does the following things:

1. He's a cab driver, and he refuses to pick up black people, because they're statistically more likely to rob him.
2. He's a cop, and he deliberately targets black people for stop-and-frisks, traffic stops, etc., because they're statistically more likely to have drugs in their possession.
3. He's a landlord, and he does his best to avoid renting to black people, because they're statistically more likely to damage the apartment and/or fail to pay rent.
4. He's an employer, and he takes extra security precautions with black employees, because they're statistically more likely to steal things.
5. He's a father, and he forbids his daughter from dating black guys, because they're statistically more likely to cheat on her.
6. He's a city-dweller, and he gets nervous/suspicious whenever he sees black people walking on his street, because they're statistically more likely to be criminals.

Would you consider any or all of the above "racist"? If not, is there a different term you think is better? They're all motivated purely by statistical risk analysis, not hatred, but surely you agree that doesn't make them hunky-dory.


I think the point is, there's nothing to indicate that any of those descriptions would have applied to George at all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Coren wrote:
Actually during interrogation it seemed pretty established that Zimmerman would have responded the same if Martin was white. In fact, it seemed like some time passed before Zimmerman even knew what color he was.

I listened to the interrogation tapes and the 911 tapes, and I didn't get the impression he was initially unaware of the fact Martin was black. In any event, I was pointing out that Serino's statement, which Foamy quoted, actually suggests that race was a factor in Zimmerman's suspicion. He stated that African-American gangs in the area often dressed in black and wore hoodies, so when Zimmerman saw Martin (who, obviously, was African-American) walking around in a hoodie, he got suspicious.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:25 am 
Offline
Lucky Bastard
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:11 am
Posts: 2341
RangerDave wrote:
Coren wrote:
Actually during interrogation it seemed pretty established that Zimmerman would have responded the same if Martin was white. In fact, it seemed like some time passed before Zimmerman even knew what color he was.

I listened to the interrogation tapes and the 911 tapes, and I didn't get the impression he was initially unaware of the fact Martin was black. In any event, I was pointing out that Serino's statement, which Foamy quoted, actually suggests that race was a factor in Zimmerman's suspicion. He stated that African-American gangs in the area often dressed in black and wore hoodies, so when Zimmerman saw Martin (who, obviously, was African-American) walking around in a hoodie, he got suspicious.


So you are focusing on that one fact, rather than look at all the facts about GZ's history of less-than-racist actions?

Also, what if Serino's statement had been:
Quote:
"Serino explained to the FBI agents that Asian-American gangs in the community "typically dressed in black and wore hoodies," the report said.
"Serino believes that when Zimmerman saw Martin in a hoody (sic), Zimmerman took it upon himself to view Martin as acting suspicious," the report said.


And TM turned out to be an Asian-American? Does that make GZ racist against Asians? No, he is going on an established definition ,which unfortunately contains African-American as part of the description, of what is described as a potential gang member observed in the dark, in a crime prone area, in the rain, in a gated community.

_________________
This must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.


Last edited by Foamy on Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:22 am
Posts: 385
RangerDave wrote:
I listened to the interrogation tapes and the 911 tapes, and I didn't get the impression he was initially unaware of the fact Martin was black..


He didn't call the NEN number for a couple of blocks after spotting Martin, and when first asked, George responded, unsure "He looks black."

Then later, after getting a closer look, George confirms, "And he’s a black male."

So, there's a few minutes where George didn't know that he was black.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Coren wrote:
He didn't call the NEN number for a couple of blocks after spotting Martin, and when first asked, George responded, unsure "He looks black." Then later, after getting a closer look, George confirms, "And he’s a black male." So, there's a few minutes where George didn't know that he was black.

Yeah, I heard that slight hesitation in his voice when he first identified Martin as black. I didn't take it as uncertainty, though; I took it as the common "****, I don't want to sound racist" hesitation that many/most non-black people have whenever they point out that someone is black. People do it all the time even in regular conversation: "Yeah, Sean's like the only...[slight drop in volume and tone] African-American...[voice back to normal] partner in the group." I admit it could have been uncertainty though. Just didn't sound that way to me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Foamy wrote:
Also, what if Serino's statement had been:
Quote:
"Serino explained to the FBI agents that Asian-American gangs in the community "typically dressed in black and wore hoodies," the report said.
"Serino believes that when Zimmerman saw Martin in a hoody (sic), Zimmerman took it upon himself to view Martin as acting suspicious," the report said.

And TM turned out to be an Asian-American? Does that make GZ racist against Asians?

It would have made Zimmerman's actions racist against Asians, yes. Note the difference between "Zimmerman is racist" and "Zimmerman's actions were racist" though. My view is not that Zimmerman has some grudge against black people. My view is that Zimmerman's (semi-conscious or even subconscious) thought process was likely something along the lines of (i) much of the local criminal activity is committed by black gangbangers; (ii) the recent break-ins were therefore likely committed by black gangbangers; (iii) black gangbangers often wear dark clothes and hoodies; (iv) hey, here's a guy in dark clothes and a hoodie walking around the neighborhood in the rain at dusk, which makes me somewhat suspicious that he's one of those gangbangers up to no good; and (v) hm, and this dude's black, which makes me even more suspicious that he's one of those gangbangers up to no good.

Steps (i)-(iii) are simplistic reasoning, but not problematic on their own. Step (iv) is paranoid and extrapolates too much from step (iii). Step (v) is where Martin's race improperly comes into play. Steps (iv) and (v) combined are what result in an innocent black guy getting harrassed and, together, constitute what I'm calling out as racism


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Dave, you seriously cannot be this dense.

Police send out notice that a bald dude in a blue-shirt has been sniffing panties in your neighborhood. You then see a bald dude in a blue-shirt wandering your neighborhood. If you report it, does it make you A) Sexist (cause he's a dude) B) Baldist C) Blue-shirtist or D) Observant?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
You're adding details now, Hop, which obviously changes the calculus and takes the emphasis even further off race. Moreover, you can't ignore the context of the world we actually live in. There are no long-standing and widespread assumptions about guys in blue shirts being criminals, so the absurdity of suspecting "blue-shirtism" doesn't mean it's absurd to suspect racism. And in any event, reporting someone in response to an APB about a specific crime and a specific suspect description is completely different than reporting someone because there were a few break-ins recently and you think this guy resembles the image you have in your head of the kind of people who probably might have committed those earlier crimes even though you have no actual witnesses or suspect descriptions to go on and actually just concocted that image in your head purely on the basis of local crime statistics but hey it's raining and starting to get dark so it's definitely probably someone who's up to no good.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:29 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
RangerDave wrote:
You're adding details now, Hop, which obviously changes the calculus and takes the emphasis even further off race. Moreover, you can't ignore the context of the world we actually live in. There are no long-standing and widespread assumptions about guys in blue shirts being criminals. And in any event, reporting someone in response to an APB about a specific crime and a specific suspect description is completely different than reporting someone because there were a few break-ins recently and you think this guy resembles the image you have in your head of the kind of people who might have committed those earlier crimes even though you have no actual witnesses or suspect descriptions to go on and actually just concocted that image in your head purely on the basis of local crime statistics.


Details from mine:
1) Location
2) Bald
3) Blue shirt
4) Male

Details from police (as outlined by the lead detective):
1) Location
2) Black
3) Hoodie
4) Male

You are just being a douchenugget now. It's ok if the descriptor is ANYTHING except race to you.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Hopwin wrote:
Details from mine:
1) Location
2) Bald
3) Blue shirt
4) Male

Details from police (as outlined by the lead detective):
1) Location
2) Black
3) Hoodie
4) Male


The difference, again, is that the details in the first scenario are a description of an actual suspect, while the latter is, in this case, a fantasy image of a generic criminal. There were no descriptions of actual suspects for the prior break-ins, so "black, hoodie, male" is a description that would only have existed in Zimmerman's head, based on statistical information at best.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Hopwin wrote:
It's ok if the descriptor is ANYTHING except race to you.

I should say, though, that I do think one has to be particularly cautious when deciding whether/how to act on the basis of a racial descriptor that happens to correspond to long-standing and widespread racial prejudices. Everything from conviction rates to reflex studies show that most people in the US, even those with no overtly racist attitudes, have an unconscious bias leading them to be extra suspicious of black people. So yes, when I hear that someone reacts with suspicion to a seemingly innocuous scenario (dude walking down the street in a hoodie while it's raining), and the "suspect" happens to be black...yeah, I'm inclined to think unconscious racial bias was a factor.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:55 pm 
Offline
Lucky Bastard
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:11 am
Posts: 2341
RangerDave wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
It's ok if the descriptor is ANYTHING except race to you.

I should say, though, that I do think one has to be particularly cautious when deciding whether/how to act on the basis of a racial descriptor that happens to correspond to long-standing and widespread racial prejudices. Everything from conviction rates to reflex studies show that most people in the US, even those with no overtly racist attitudes, have an unconscious bias leading them to be extra suspicious of black people. So yes, when I hear that someone reacts with suspicion to a seemingly innocuous scenario (dude walking down the street in a hoodie while it's raining), and the "suspect" happens to be black...yeah, I'm inclined to think unconscious racial bias was a factor.


You say that most people have it, fine. Why then do you ignore the other factors investigated and found out about Zimmerman that would seem to help dispel the idea that he acted out of an "unconscious racial bias"?

_________________
This must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Yeah, I heard that slight hesitation in his voice when he first identified Martin as black. I didn't take it as uncertainty, though; I took it as the common "****, I don't want to sound racist" hesitation that many/most non-black people have whenever they point out that someone is black.


Do you realize how ridiculous you are sounding here? You're presented with tons of information, and in EVERY CASE, you're assuming the worst case scenario for the situation described.

With all of this information, the only way you can be satisfied that he's racist is to assume the worst out of every gray area. At what point should someone realize that they are having to make too many assumptions for their point to stand?

The picture fits together quite nicely if we assume he was not racist, but overzealous in his neighborhood watch duties, Martin was wandering somewhat with no particular hurry to get home, and to an overzealous guy, his wanderings looked suspicious.

Occam's razor, and all that. You're stretching at this point.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:15 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
RangerDave wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
Details from mine:
1) Location
2) Bald
3) Blue shirt
4) Male

Details from police (as outlined by the lead detective):
1) Location
2) Black
3) Hoodie
4) Male


The difference, again, is that the details in the first scenario are a description of an actual suspect, while the latter is, in this case, a fantasy image of a generic criminal. There were no descriptions of actual suspects for the prior break-ins, so "black, hoodie, male" is a description that would only have existed in Zimmerman's head, based on statistical information at best.


So if I had said a bunch of bald guys are doing illegal stuff in the neighborhood then my example would be sexist, baldist and shirtest?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Foamy wrote:
You say that most people have it, fine. Why then do you ignore the other factors investigated and found out about Zimmerman that would seem to help dispel the idea that he acted out of an "unconscious racial bias"?

Basically because I don't think the non-racial circumstances (dude wearing a hoodie and walking in the rain) were even remotely sufficient to trigger suspicion in anyone, even an over-zealous guy like Zimmerman, and because, by his own admission, his suspicion of Martin was influenced by his belief that the prior burglaries had been committed by young, black gangbangers. In other words, there's nothing suspicious about Martin other than the fact that he looks like what Zimmerman thinks the people who committed those other burglaries probably looked like (i.e. black dudes wearing hoodies). How is that not racial bias?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Foamy wrote:
You say that most people have it, fine. Why then do you ignore the other factors investigated and found out about Zimmerman that would seem to help dispel the idea that he acted out of an "unconscious racial bias"?

Basically because I don't think the non-racial circumstances (dude wearing a hoodie and walking in the rain) were even remotely sufficient to trigger suspicion in anyone, even an over-zealous guy like Zimmerman, and because, by his own admission, his suspicion of Martin was influenced by his belief that the prior burglaries had been committed by young, black gangbangers. In other words, there's nothing suspicious about Martin other than the fact that he looks like what Zimmerman thinks the people who committed those other burglaries probably looked like (i.e. black dudes wearing hoodies). How is that not racial bias?


And the fact that he was wandering around on other people's property in the rain.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:37 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
RangerDave wrote:
Basically because I don't think the non-racial circumstances (dude wearing a hoodie and walking in the rain) were even remotely sufficient to trigger suspicion in anyone, even an over-zealous guy like Zimmerman, and because, by his own admission, his suspicion of Martin was influenced by his belief that the prior burglaries had been committed by young, black gangbangers. In other words, there's nothing suspicious about Martin other than the fact that he looks like what Zimmerman thinks was told by police the people who committed those other burglaries probably looked like (i.e. black dudes wearing hoodies). How is that not racial bias?

FTFY.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
And the fact that he was wandering around on other people's property in the rain.

Before or after Zimmerman started following him?

Hopwin wrote:
FTFY.

Fair enough.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
So, if I understand correctly, this is the position you guys are taking:

There had been multiple burglaries in the neighborhood in recent months, most or all of them committed by young, black males. Zimmerman was aware of this fact and, indeed, had called a couple of those events in to the cops. However, when he saw Martin, Zimmerman was suspicious solely because Martin was wearing a hoodie and walking slowly in the rain; the fact that he was a young, black male had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Zimmerman's level of suspicion. Alternatively, though, to the extent Martin's race was a factor, it was just one of several, was an appropriate consideration in light of the prior burglaries, and therefore was not an example of racial bias.

Is that about right?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
And the fact that he was wandering around on other people's property in the rain.

Before or after Zimmerman started following him?


According to him, before. That's why he started following him.


Quote:
Zimmerman:

We’ve had some break-ins in my neighborhood and there’s a real suspicious guy. It’s Retreat View Circle. The best address I can give you is 111 Retreat View Circle.

This guy looks like he’s up to no good or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around looking about. [00:25]

911 dispatcher:

OK, is he White, Black, or Hispanic?

Zimmerman:

He looks black.

911 dispatcher:

Did you see what he was wearing?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, a dark hoodie like a gray hoodie. He wore jeans or sweat pants and white tennis shoes. He’s here now … he’s just staring. [00:42]

911 dispatcher:

He’s just walking around the area, the houses? OK.

Zimmerman:

Now he’s staring at me. [00:48]

911 dispatcher:

OK, you said that’s 1111 Retreat View or 111?

Zimmerman:

That’s the clubhouse.

911 dispatcher:

He’s near the clubhouse now?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, now he’s coming toward me. He’s got his hands in his waist band.

And he’s a black male.[1:03]

911 dispatcher:

How old would you say he is?

Zimmerman:

He’s got something on his shirt. About like his late teens.

911 dispatcher:

Late teens?

Zimmerman:

Uh, huh.

Something’s wrong with him. Yep, he’s coming to check me out.

He’s got something in his hands. I don’t know what his deal is. [01:20]

911 dispatcher:

Let me know if he does anything, OK?

Zimmerman:

OK.

911 dispatcher:

We’ve got him on the wire. Just let me know if this guy does anything else.

Zimmerman:

OK.

These assholes. They always get away.

When you come to the clubhouse, you come straight in and you go left. Actually, you would go past the clubhouse. [1:39]

911 dispatcher:

OK, so it’s on the left hand side of the clubhouse?

Zimmerman:

Yeah. You go in straight through the entrance and then you would go left. You go straight in, don’t turn and make a left.

He’s running. [2:08]

911 dispatcher:

He’s running? Which way is he running?

Zimmerman:

Down toward the other entrance of the neighborhood. [2:14]

911 dispatcher:

OK, which entrance is that he’s headed towards?

Zimmerman:

The back entrance.

(inaudible)

911 dispatcher:

Are you following him? [2:24]

Zimmerman:

Yeah. [2:25]

911 dispatcher:

OK.

We don’t need you to do that. [2:26]

Zimmerman:

OK. [2:28]

911 dispatcher:

Alright, sir, what is your name? [2:34]

Zimmerman:

George. He ran.

911 dispatcher:

Alright, George, what’s your last name?

Zimmerman:

Zimmerman.

911 dispatcher:

What’s the phone number you’re calling from?

Zimmerman:

407-435-2400

911 dispatcher:

Alright, George, we do have them on the way. Do you want to meet with the officer when they get out there?

Zimmerman:

Yeah.

911 dispatcher:

Alright, where are you going to meet with them at?

Zimmerman:

Um, if they come in through the gate, tell them to go straight past the clubhouse and, uh, straight past the clubhouse and make a left and then go past the mailboxes you’ll see my truck. [3:10]

911 dispatcher:

Alright, what address are you parked in front of? [3:21]

Zimmerman:

Um, I don’t know. It’s a cut-through so I don’t know the address. [3:25]

911 dispatcher:

OK, do you live in the area?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, yeah, I live here.

911 dispatcher:

OK, what’s your apartment number?

Zimmerman:

It’s a home. It’s 1950 – oh, crap, I don’t want to give it out – I don’t know where this kid is [inaudible] [3:40]

911 dispatcher:

OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then? [3:42]

Zimmerman:

Yeah, that’s fine. [3:43]

911 dispatcher:

Alright, George, I’ll let them know you’ll meet them at …

Zimmerman:

Could you have them call me and I’ll tell them where I’m at? [3:49]

911 dispatcher:

OK, that’s no problem.

Zimmerman:

My number … you’ve got it?

911 dispatcher:

Yeah, I’ve got it. 435-2400?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, you got it.

911 dispatcher:

OK, no problem. I’ll let them know to call you when they’re in the area. [4:02]

Zimmerman:

Thanks.

911 dispatcher:

You’re welcome.

Call ends 4:07


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:43 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
RangerDave wrote:
Foamy wrote:
You say that most people have it, fine. Why then do you ignore the other factors investigated and found out about Zimmerman that would seem to help dispel the idea that he acted out of an "unconscious racial bias"?

Basically because I don't think the non-racial circumstances (dude wearing a hoodie and walking in the rain) were even remotely sufficient to trigger suspicion in anyone, even an over-zealous guy like Zimmerman


Then you're wrong.

Also all your scenarios presented above based on statistics are not racist - anymore than declaring that blacks have a statistically higher rate of sickle-cell anemia is racist.

Racism is the belief that one race is inherently superior to another. All your instances at worst were a person expressing prejudice. They are not the same thing.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:46 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
White guilt is a terrible thing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 47  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group