The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:41 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:34 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
But the failures have access to those roads bridges and teachers too.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Lenas wrote:
What are people even mad about? The fact that Obama made a good point? Jesus Christ. None of us have gotten where we are, good or bad, on our own. At no point did he say that the fruits of your labors are not your own. He's saying that we as a people should strive to help others because it's guaranteed that someone helped us out at some point. What's wrong with that?


Why do you believe he said this?

This is a reiteration of Elizabeth Warrens comments:

Quote:
"You built a factory out there? Good for you," she says. "But I want to be clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did."

She continues: "Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea? God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along."


So it's not a "by the way, businesses use roads" or a "the more you know!" PSA. It's a prelude to raising taxes on businesses and "the rich" (queue evil music). Not to mention, how big of a douche do you need to be to tell people they didnt build their businesses. My Dad owned a small business and it's no easy task, quite risky. At best it was a stupid thing to say even conceeding that yeah, infrastructure is great. Small government not no government.

So sure society in general and infrastructure is needed. Society =/= government and infrastructure like roads, police and fire are State functions not federal. Add to that the fact that businesses already pay more than their fair share in taxes and the question again comes up: why did he say this?

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:11 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
TheRiov wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
The goal of progressives equality of output by equality by sameness. The only way to achieve this is to tear everyone down to the lowest point yet they need to see themselves as trying to lift everyone up to the same point (so their ego can survive). The cognitive dissonance allows them to ignore the consequences of their (mostly well-intentioned) policies.

Any person showing outstanding qualities and outcomes is direct contradiction to their goals and beliefs. This highlights their dissonance and so the very idea that there are any unique characteristics in everyone must be destroyed. This is why diversity to progressives means diversity in meaningless ways (ethnicity, race, sex, sexual orientation,etc) but never in ideas (because people have different quality ideas).

Its not just inferiority but the paralyzing realization that they just might be average themselves that usually sparks the beginning of this destructive mental state.

it amuses me that the accusation here is of Liberal ego.


Of course you're amused as its your defense against realizing your own cognitive dissonance. You need to force everyone into the collective you've imagined because you've imagined what makes you feel better.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Dash wrote:
Lenas wrote:
He's saying that we as a people should strive to help others because it's guaranteed that someone helped us out at some point.

Why do you believe he said this? This is a reiteration of Elizabeth Warrens comments....It's a prelude to raising taxes on businesses and "the rich" (queue evil music).

I don't see a disconnect between the two. The latter is simply the mechanism by which he's proposing we pursue the former.

Quote:
Not to mention, how big of a douche do you need to be to tell people they didnt build their businesses.

I think that's a misinterpretation of what he said, Dash. Did you watch the full clip of that section of his speech or just hear/read the quote from Romney's ad? When I watched the actual clip, it seemed pretty clear to me that the line "you didn't build that" was a reference to the background infrastructure and institutions of the country, not to the owners' businesses.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:01 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Image

/snicker

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:37 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
Rorinthas wrote:
But the failures have access to those roads bridges and teachers too.


Well obviously those road bridges and teachers were racist :derp:

Ops, wrong thread :popcorn:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:31 am 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Lydiaa wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
But the failures have access to those roads bridges and teachers too.


Well obviously those road bridges and teachers were racist :derp:

Ops, wrong thread :popcorn:


It is amusing that those racist bridges and teachers are not against Asians, guess you guys and gals are not actual minorities! :)

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:14 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
RangerDave wrote:
I don't see a disconnect between the two. The latter is simply the mechanism by which he's proposing we pursue the former.

Quote:
Not to mention, how big of a douche do you need to be to tell people they didnt build their businesses.


I think that's a misinterpretation of what he said, Dash. Did you watch the full clip of that section of his speech or just hear/read the quote from Romney's ad? When I watched the actual clip, it seemed pretty clear to me that the line "you didn't build that" was a reference to the background infrastructure and institutions of the country, not to the owners' businesses.


I agree there is no disconnect. He is clearly saying "we get a cut of your business". Again we being the federal "we" in this case and of course, the amount is whatever he says it should be regardless of the fact that business owners are taxpayers and already paid as much as anyone else to build the roads. The roads built by local property and sales taxes.

Not many things fire me up politically like this sort of bullshit. He's telling the people who are out there doing things, being productive, creating jobs, paying more than everyone else in taxes that... YOU OWE ME. The only reason he's saying it by the way is to score political points. His tax increases wont do much for the deficit but it will let him say he's making "the rich pay their fair share". **** this guy, and I'm not an Obama hater, just an Obama disagreer ;)

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:40 am 
Offline
Eatin yur toes.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:49 am
Posts: 836
Vindicarre wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Most aren't overly worried about it. It just speaks to his general attitude. You're not smarter, you're not harder working, you're just lucky.


Only the problem is that he doesn't say anything even remotely close to that.


President Obama wrote:
I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.


It appears that he did say something quite close to that. The reference to smart people who didn't succeed, and the reference to hardworking people who didn't succeed implies that you weren't smarter, nor were you harder working. Why, then do some succeed when others fail? His answer is clear: "somebody along the line gave you some help". The problem I have with that answer is, as the rest of his speech goes on to assert, as an American you've benefited from the American society. The items he mentioned are there individually and most often collectively for American's to use. So that makes one repeat the question, Why do some succeed when others fail, if it's not because of intellect, or work ethic, and the resources he cited are available to Americans collectively, why then? I believe the real point of the whole statement is that he wants us to believe that the things he cited are provided by Government, and by implication the only way that the success rate can be "fair" is through more Government.


I think you may be confusing necessity and sufficiency. I don't read it as saying being smart and hard working is irrelevant - just that it is not sufficient, I.e it is not a solo endeavour.

I.e
It is necessary to be smart and work hard. It is also necessary to have some luck and some help. Our success is not entirely our own.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:04 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Lenas wrote:
You're right. Smart, hard working and successful are all subjective terms. That makes this discussion seem even more stupid.

It is a political discussion. Redundant statements are redundant.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
SuiNeko wrote:
I.e
It is necessary to be smart and work hard. It is also necessary to have some luck and some help. Our success is not entirely our own.


But of course nobody does anything in a society on their own, that's stating the obvious. Is the federal government the embodiment of help though? Who helps? Other businesses, family, friends, neighborhoods, social clubs, churches... civil groups. The LOCAL governments role is to provide basic infrastructure. Everyone has access to that infrastructure.

It's quite clear he's attacking people who own businesses. There is no other way to read it. FOrget the "you didnt build that" for a minute, he's scolding business owners saying they owe the federal government when this nation was founded on exactly the opposite.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Dash wrote:
It's quite clear he's attacking people who own businesses. There is no other way to read it. FOrget the "you didnt build that" for a minute, he's scolding business owners saying they owe the federal government when this nation was founded on exactly the opposite.


If he's targeting anyone it's large businesses and the very wealthy. Any other interpretation is your conservative bias getting it's undies in a bunch.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:22 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
Dash wrote:
It's quite clear he's attacking people who own businesses. There is no other way to read it. FOrget the "you didnt build that" for a minute, he's scolding business owners saying they owe the federal government when this nation was founded on exactly the opposite.


Any other interpretation is your conservative bias getting it's undies in a bunch.



Isn't it just as easy to say any interpretation that YOU make is just a blind defense of your boy and his policies? We all have bias. Your lib bias is just as heavy as any conservative bias on this board.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
My interpretation of his comments is based off of the actual words he used and the context of the ENTIRE speech. So, no I don't think so.

It should be noted, I don't have any problem with people disagreeing with his statement or thinking that his arguments are wrong. My issue is that folks here are not actually listening to what he actually said and understanding the full speech, and then taking those small parts they listened to and twisting them into something that he did NOT say or mean.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Aizle wrote:
Dash wrote:
It's quite clear he's attacking people who own businesses. There is no other way to read it. FOrget the "you didnt build that" for a minute, he's scolding business owners saying they owe the federal government when this nation was founded on exactly the opposite.


If he's targeting anyone it's large businesses and the very wealthy. Any other interpretation is your conservative bias getting it's undies in a bunch.


If you've got A BUSINESS

Nope, not just large businesses.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:39 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
My interpretation of his comments is based off of the actual words he used and the context of the ENTIRE speech. So, no I don't think so.

It should be noted, I don't have any problem with people disagreeing with his statement or thinking that his arguments are wrong. My issue is that folks here are not actually listening to what he actually said and understanding the full speech, and then taking those small parts they listened to and twisting them into something that he did NOT say or mean.



But, we are...you just don't like or agree with our opinions and interpretation of his comments...you are now basically saying that you and only people who agree with you TRUELY understand what he said and that everyone else is just playing politics. It doesn't work like that.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
No, Nitefox, you really aren't. But keep on believing that if it makes you happy. I for one gave up actually convincing anyone of anything here a long while ago.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:47 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
No, Nitefox, you really aren't. But keep on believing that if it makes you happy. I for one gave up actually convincing anyone of anything here a long while ago.



Thanks for proving my point *******. You are basically doing the equvilant of "I'm taking my ball and going home".

What a piece of **** you are.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Dash wrote:
It's quite clear he's attacking people who own businesses. There is no other way to read it. FOrget the "you didnt build that" for a minute, he's scolding business owners saying they owe the federal government when this nation was founded on exactly the opposite.


If he's targeting anyone it's large businesses and the very wealthy. Any other interpretation is your conservative bias getting it's undies in a bunch.


If you've got A BUSINESS

Nope, not just large businesses.


Thanks for proving my point. If you look at the text of the speech and look at the rest of the context, you'll find some more information that qualifies that particular section that you're quoting out of context.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:00 am 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
Nitefox wrote:
Aizle wrote:
No, Nitefox, you really aren't. But keep on believing that if it makes you happy. I for one gave up actually convincing anyone of anything here a long while ago.



Thanks for proving my point *******. You are basically doing the equvilant of "I'm taking my ball and going home".

What a piece of **** you are.

And we're devolving into name calling again.....

And quitting the glade would be the equivalent of 'taking his ball and going home' (we don't know anyone here who's done THAT or anything :roll: ) he's just stating that he doesn't expect to convince you of anything, not that he's leaving. (that's not directed at any one person, we have tons of people on all sides who've dramatically walked out stating they're done with the glade) Most come back at some time or other.


Last edited by TheRiov on Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:05 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Aizle:

I'm afraid you're the one taking Obama's comments out of context and spinning them for personal gain: our sitting president is demonstrably hostile toward small business, independent entrepreneurs, and wealth generation. While the comment itself was a meaningless piece of political glad-handing, the crux of Nitefox's arguments or Dash's disagreement; the genesis if their disgust is in his policies; and Obama's policies are hostile toward small business, independent entrepreneurs, and wealth generation. We have 4 years of Presidential policy that has decimated the private sector; we have 4 years of Presidential policy that have increased the barriers to entry for small businesses and profitability; we have 4 years of Presidential policy predicated on the thought that the "people" are a never-ending source of free credit and capital for a financially irresponsible nitwit who has refused to submit a budget to Congress since his first year.

The comment was stupid and ill-spoken, but it's little more than campaign speech. What it does, however, is give people a focus point for all of the policy decisions he's made that give truth to their understanding of his words. It speaks to his delusional understanding of economics and the disastrous disease that's eating at the developed world. The Law of Supply and Demand doesn't go away if you ignore it; it doesn't cease to apply if you don't believe in it.

Resources are finite.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Aizle wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Dash wrote:
It's quite clear he's attacking people who own businesses. There is no other way to read it. FOrget the "you didnt build that" for a minute, he's scolding business owners saying they owe the federal government when this nation was founded on exactly the opposite.


If he's targeting anyone it's large businesses and the very wealthy. Any other interpretation is your conservative bias getting it's undies in a bunch.


If you've got A BUSINESS

Nope, not just large businesses.


Thanks for proving my point. If you look at the text of the speech and look at the rest of the context, you'll find some more information that qualifies that particular section that you're quoting out of context.


I have, and no I didn't. Feel free to show your work.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:13 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
A good article summing up my feelings on this:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... story.html

Quote:
Obama compounds the fallacy by declaring the state to be the font of entrepreneurial success. How so? It created the infrastructure — roads, bridges, schools, Internet — off which we all thrive.

Absurd. We don’t credit the Swiss postal service with the Special Theory of Relativity because it transmitted Einstein’s manuscript to the Annalen der Physik. Everyone drives the roads, goes to school, uses the mails. So did Steve Jobs. Yet only he created the Mac and the iPad.

Obama’s infrastructure argument is easily refuted by what is essentially a controlled social experiment. Roads and schools are the constant. What’s variable is the energy, enterprise, risk-taking, hard work and genius of the individual. It is therefore precisely those individual characteristics, not the communal utilities, that account for the different outcomes.


I think that sums it up. Yes we all contribute to infrastructure and that is a long standing function of government. As with many things, it's not so much what politicians say it's how they leverage that into what they are doing or how they will twist it according to their ideology.

I think this will be debated through the election in conjunction with the economy. While it does really annoy me, even I am not looking forward to hearing "you didnt build that" repeated non stop for 3 months. I do like the debate though, I think it's an important one.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Aizle wrote:
Dash wrote:
It's quite clear he's attacking people who own businesses. There is no other way to read it. FOrget the "you didnt build that" for a minute, he's scolding business owners saying they owe the federal government when this nation was founded on exactly the opposite.


If he's targeting anyone it's large businesses and the very wealthy. Any other interpretation is your conservative bias getting it's undies in a bunch.

Household income > $250,000 = very wealthy?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:54 am 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Actually I just realized it, as Obama understands business, in his very limited sense. Success is dependent on some one else. His idea of a business model is to receive a federal grant, aka Solyndra.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 217 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group