Corolinth wrote:
Yes. Testosterone is the primary reason why men are larger and stronger than women. Furthermore, it makes us more aggressive, which can easily tip the scales in a physical contest.
To me, this whole issues ties back into doping and interpretation of what is considered naturally clearly delineated boundaries. Men and women compete separately in most sports. Steroids are not legal under nearly every sanctioning sports body, yet the mechanism by which they work is elevating normal body functions. In fact, androgenic steroids would have similar effects to the woman's body as this Semenya's elevated male hormones had to her.
Remember when Big Mack and Sosa were trying to break the single season HR record and people were ***** about use of synthetic Creatine? Most sports sanctioning bodies don't have a problem with it from a doping perspective nowadays, only high school athletics typically ban it due to potential adverse health problems (most of which have been proven to be false when used correctly). Yet it similarly is just elevating the level of a specific substance the body already produces. The strength gains by training with can be tremendous.
A guy from my high school who ran track and xc who rain in Beijing in 2008 is participating in Nike's Oregon Project. You can google it, but the short of it is it's a oxygen deprivation training technique where they live in an oxygen reduced environment but train at sea level. Since traveling to train at sea level then living at elevation is logistically unfeasible, the house is used instead. It has been coming under criticism as doping by the international running community. But if they really flew back and forth every day, would they consider this doping?
What about whey protein? Almost everyone who lifts weights, whether for sports, mass gains or whatever uses it, including myself. Is it doping? Eating a healthy diet? Getting proper sleep? Training too hard? It seems as though almost everything can be considered doping based solely if it's a new technique and causes controversy versus analysis of the actual mechanism.
I suppose if use of androgenic steroids is not legal, then Semenya should not be allowed to compete with women. That is one perspective. But then again, she produces the elevated male-level hormones without "aid". Should this classify her as a man then? Should other women get to dope up their hormone levels? If so, should anabolic steroids be legal in all sports to give naturally less "intense" competitors an even playing field.
Why do we watch competitive sports? Most sports lend themselves to a certain physique, but you sometimes see athletes outside this template excel (Nate Robinson for the NY Knicks for example). Should substances be part of leveling this playing field? Are watching sports to see the greatest competitors or the greatest competition?