RangerDave wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
There are three different issues here....One is whether the letters are form letters....The second is whether they are hand-signed....The third is the rapper-versus-SEALs issue.
There's also a fourth issue - what standard policy was when Obama took office. If it was already standard policy to send the same form letter to Seals as other service people, then Obama simply continuing that policy isn't noteworthy. If the policy was to send special letters to SEALS and he changed the policy, that's obviously noteworthy, but the rapper comparison would still be specious, because the two simply aren't related. As Amanar said, you might as well bring up any of the thousand other activities the President engages in. Anyway, that hypo is kind of moot, since my understanding is that SOP when Obama took office was for everyone to get a form letter, and he just continued that existing policy.
Since they both involve sending letters to the relatives of dead people, the comparison would never be specious. As for continuing policies.. I suppose it's not noteworthy that Gitmo is still open either? To me it's certainly not, but other people seem to think it's a major issue. This is a far more minor issue, but it is something that should be addressed. If this is going to turn into "but no one ***** when Bush did it!" that's because it didn't come up at the time.
Quote:
As for what the President (any President) should do, my view is he should hand-sign every letter if at all possible and make a point of contacting soldiers and families directly for particularly high profile and/or heroic actions. I'm not sure there should be a blanket policy of favoring Special Forces though. Yes, they volunteer for unusually dangerous duty, but still, I'd worry that regular servicepeople and their families (especially those who are grieving) would take it as a slight if they get only a form letter while other servicepeople get personal notes as a matter of course. After all, it's not like regular infantry guys in Afghanistan have particularly safe jobs, and KIA is KIA no matter what.
I'm well aware of that. I also normally object to the sort of elitism that special operations troops normally show towards other soldiers. If you've ever read
Blackhawk Down, it shows this in full color with the Delta operators looking down on the Rangers who in turn look down on the regular 10th Mountain Division soldiers, and on the barest of excuses. If you've seen the movie, you see this attitude in full force with the Delta operator who objected when the Ranger company commander corrected him for having a weapon not on safe in the chow hall. Despite the movie's portrayal of the scene as an uptight officer giving a Delta operator a hard time, the fact is that the Captain was totally in the right and the Delta operator 100% in the wrong, and probably should have been kicked out of the chow hall for a week or so. The book makes this even more clear, with some of the Delta operators spending more criticizing everyone from the Rangers to the helicopter pilots than they do fighting the Somalis. Essentially the Delta operators, who are highly unique people, are criticizing the rest of the Army for not working the way they do, even though the Army could never function that way. There's a reason Delta Force is such a small organization.
But I digress. Yes, dead is dead. However, if you've gone out of your way to volunteer for exceptionally dangerous duty, some recognition of that is in order. That's why we don't give every dead person the same posthumous medal. If you got killed pulling an injured soldier to safety, that's rather a different matter than if you just had bad luck and got hit by a mortar round ont he way to the chow hall. No one seems to object to that.