Taskiss wrote:
When bitcoins were ignored by the treasury, it had a chance.
Your argument that it can't be stopped seems to indicate you believe that the currency can withstand the pressures criminalization will impose. I don't agree. I think all other nations will follow the lead of the US treasury.
If it can only be used illegally it loses the only benefit I see it provides - as a speculative investment. Right now with the interest rates at a ridiculous low, people are investing in anything they feel will provide some reward. That's why the stock market is where it is, despite the impending (or current) recession. People are in a frenzy trying to put their money where it might grow. Introduce risk, people will pull out.
I think we have a bit of a disconnect here. Will you ever be able to go buy stuff at Sears with BTC? Not likely. But the currency was designed to be untraceable, not able to be confiscated, anonymous and require no clearinghouse to make transfees. Those characteristics alone make it incredibly likely to be crimibalized by governments. The given reason is because it's a sound currency which can be used for black market purchases, which is true. The more insidious reason is that it is not likely to be taxed and isn't subject to inflationary policies of central banking entities.
Governments have criminalized drugs for centuries yet they are still bought, sold and traded in large volumes. That BTC isn't physical, can be traded over the entire world near instantly, much harder to confiscate and seems to have solved the problem of being distributed yet secure and sound I estimate it will be even more prevelant than and important than drugs.
It's not just a speculative investment because it provides a quality no other centrally issued currency provides (save perhaps the Swiss Franc): transparency and a sound base. Perhaps this view is informed by the severity that centrally issued currencies undermine the proletariat; if you don't see central fractional-reserve banking as an insidious and underhanded means of control over the masses, it's understandable you might not see the inherent valuenof BTC. I would just strongly disagree with such a position.