TheRiov wrote:
I guess I take the opposite tack. Just thinking and explaining which rights you most highly value and which ones you would be willing to sacrifice for which reason is a valid thought experiment. No one is asking them to actually give them up. My reading is more that the teacher was appalled by the students willingness to surrender rights and had them write a note so parents could address that.
Furthermore, historically people have been willing to sacrifice some rights, and some limitations on rights for security.
Much of MY social science education was focused on understanding alternate perspectives, including other societies. It in no way implies that I agree with them, but I can at least understand some of the mindset that has led to dictatorial regimes for example
YMMV
This might be true for older children or college students, but for kids who are still in elementary school the concept of a thought experiment is something they really don't yet grasp for the most part (obviously there might be exceptions). Even adolescents have a hard time keeping sight of the difference between "is" and "should be"; that's part of what makes them adolescents rather than adults, but with adolescents, introducing them to such things helps them develop into adults. Smaller children don't yet have adolescent thought tools.
The making them sign their name to it part is especially disturbing though, because even fourth garders know that when an adult signs, it's Something Serious. There was absolutely no reason to do that, no matter what other merits the assignment may or may not have had.