The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:00 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:07 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/us/fl ... .html?_r=0

Where was the Times for the hundreds (if not thousands) of young men who were prosecuted for the same situation. Age of consent does not apply for same sex sexual assault?

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:13 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
:popcorn:

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:19 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
It's obscene to have a law that penalizes an 18 year old with a 14 year old lover. They are practically the same age-- they're both potentially high school students.

Canada's law may not be perfect, but it at least is fair:

Quote:
In June 2006, the Canadian government proposed a bill to raise the age of consent from 14 to 16, while creating a close-in-age exemption for sex between 14-15 year olds and partners up to 5 years older, and keeping an existing close-in-age clause for sex between 12-13 year olds and partners up to 2 years older. The initiative also maintains a temporary exception for already existing marriages of 14 and 15 year olds, but forbids new marriages like these in the future.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:21 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
The Times (and MSNBC & CNN) seem to be picking this up as the new cause to run with. It is an equal application of the law that has them upset.

The untold number of men who were prosecuted under this law seem to have no mention, but have some cute teenage lesbians it becomes news about oppression.

The Canadian one sounds a bit more realistic though.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 2:22 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Müs wrote:
:popcorn:


I admit it, this was pure flame bait, I wish this had occured a few years back with a few of the more rabid posters, it could have been a twenty pager.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-me ... 8-year-old

"an LGBT Injustice!"

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 3:24 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
A law that penalizes an 18 year old for having sex with a 14 year old is hardly obscene, but it's hardly entirely fair either. The problem with laws surrounding sex between teenagers is that it focuses on age, not on the relationship between them. A pair of high school teammates are really not of any difference in power and influence over each other. On the other hand, if the older girl had been an assistant coach or other person the younger would regard as an authority figure for reasons in addition to age, that would be a problem.

Either way, the idea that this is based on the same-sex nature of the relationship is hilarious. If anything, this is a sign that Florida enforces the law fairly and does not aim it only at males (gay or straight).

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 3:49 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Diamondeye wrote:
Either way, the idea that this is based on the same-sex nature of the relationship is hilarious. If anything, this is a sign that Florida enforces the law fairly and does not aim it only at males (gay or straight).


The law enforcement absolutely is because of the same sex nature. The parents of the 14yo are pressing charges because they don't approve of the same sex nature of the relationship.

But the main thrust is that its only a big story now because its girl-girl, and touted as unfairly applied because of that. Hence, :popcorn:

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 4:41 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
No, Ara, the law enforcement is not about sexual preference. The law enforcement is because it was brought to the attention of enforcers of law, and a sexual relationship between an 18 year old and a 14 year old is against the law in that jurisdiction. The 14yr old's parents are not law enforcement, and the reason you insist it is because of the same-sex nature of the relationship is because the parents of the accused and a facebook page said so.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline
Bru's Sweetie

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 2675
Location: San Jose, CA
The report that I read a couple of days ago stated that Kaitlyn Hunt was 17 and her friend was 15 when they started dating. In my opinion, that is not statutory rape.

_________________
"Said I never had much use for one, never said I didn't know how to use one!"~ Matthew Quigley

"nothing like a little meow in bed at night" ~ Bruskey

"I gotta float my stick same as you" Hondo Lane

"Fill your hand you son of a *****!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 5:13 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Most of the News reports have it at 18 on 14

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 5:19 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Vindicarre wrote:
No, Ara, the law enforcement is not about sexual preference. The law enforcement is because it was brought to the attention of enforcers of law, and a sexual relationship between an 18 year old and a 14 year old is against the law in that jurisdiction. The 14yr old's parents are not law enforcement, and the reason you insist it is because of the same-sex nature of the relationship is because the parents of the accused and a facebook page said so.


I'm going off this:
Quote:
Steven Hunt Jr., Ms. Hunt’s father, wrote in an introduction to the online petition that he believed “Kaitlyn’s girlfriend’s parents are pressing charges because they are against the same-sex relationship, even though their daughter has stated that this is a consensual relationship.”


/shrug.

I can't speak to whether or not the younger girl's parents would have gone to the police if it was a 17/18 y/o male. But if it was a male/female situation, its not likely that it would be news at all.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 6:52 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
It probably wouldn't be. That does not change the fact that the law enforcement is not because of the same sex nature of the case. If it were a young man, he'd most likely quietly take the plea bargain since he would have no media to scream to that its because of his sexual orientaion.

Vindi is correct. The law may not be fair, but the enforcement practice is.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 6:54 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Jasmy wrote:
The report that I read a couple of days ago stated that Kaitlyn Hunt was 17 and her friend was 15 when they started dating. In my opinion, that is not statutory rape.

It isn't dating thats statutory rape, its the sex. Whether 17 and 15 would be depends on the state.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:54 pm 
Offline
Bru's Sweetie

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 2675
Location: San Jose, CA
I will have to try to find the report I read, but according to it both of them would have been minors and consenting at the time, so the fact that they were both minors (according to the first report I read) when it started and the fact that ages have been changed in other reports, leads me to believe some shenanigans are going on to make this look worse than it should be, or else the first report was completely wrong, in which case I would like to have more truthful information on which to base my decision.

_________________
"Said I never had much use for one, never said I didn't know how to use one!"~ Matthew Quigley

"nothing like a little meow in bed at night" ~ Bruskey

"I gotta float my stick same as you" Hondo Lane

"Fill your hand you son of a *****!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 2:26 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
I think it's pretty likely the first report was simply wrong, since the difference in age is either 2 years, or 4. If the accused is 18 now, and they were really 17 and 15, the "victim" would have to be 16 (or close to it) now, not 14. That's something that would be pretty damn hard to hide with shennannigans.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
4 years difference in age always seemed proper to me. As for lesbians, that's not really sex anyway. ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2013 5:40 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Müs wrote:
Vindicarre wrote:
No, Ara, the law enforcement is not about sexual preference. The law enforcement is because it was brought to the attention of enforcers of law, and a sexual relationship between an 18 year old and a 14 year old is against the law in that jurisdiction. The 14yr old's parents are not law enforcement, and the reason you insist it is because of the same-sex nature of the relationship is because the parents of the accused and a facebook page said so.


I'm going off this:
Quote:
Steven Hunt Jr., Ms. Hunt’s father, wrote in an introduction to the online petition that he believed “Kaitlyn’s girlfriend’s parents are pressing charges because they are against the same-sex relationship, even though their daughter has stated that this is a consensual relationship.”


/shrug.

I can't speak to whether or not the younger girl's parents would have gone to the police if it was a 17/18 y/o male. But if it was a male/female situation, its not likely that it would be news at all.


So you're going off what the accused's father wrote to start an online petition. Got it.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2013 5:53 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
I was propositioned last year by a 15-year old girl. Shocked the blazes out of me and if I had gone anywhere with it (I politely declined) the judicial system could have put me away for a long time and taken everything I have and that would have been that. I would have agreed that I had knowingly broken the law and couldn't have defended myself with a straight face.

When I was 18 I would have risked it, heck, I did have a 16 year old girlfriend then. Yes.

The law in Canada seems to make much more sense than the laws here.

Given the sexuality involved it is just more people scared of what they don't understand tying to make their fears and dark fantasies illegal.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2013 9:10 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
The laws regarding sex between teenagers of various ages are not there because teenagers don't want sex. They're there because teenagers don't make good decisions about whether they should have sex, whether they want to or not. This is the same for both males and females; unfortunately we have created this idea as a society that teenage girls really just want to say "no" but lack the self-confidence to do so. While sometimes that's the case, the simple fact is that teenagers of both genders have hormones, and both genders make stupid decisions because of them.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:49 pm
Posts: 3455
Location: St. Louis, MO
Diamondeye wrote:
They're there because teenagers don't make good decisions about whether they should have sex, whether they want to or not.

If that is, in fact, the reason the laws are on the books, that's a bad dividing line. This is not a problem restricted, or even largely skewed towards, teenagers.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 6:54 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
shuyung wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
They're there because teenagers don't make good decisions about whether they should have sex, whether they want to or not.

If that is, in fact, the reason the laws are on the books, that's a bad dividing line. This is not a problem restricted, or even largely skewed towards, teenagers.


It's not, but the reason teenagers make those bad decisions is directly related to age - namely, they just don't know any better, and don't yet have a good sense of risk.

It has the advantages of being objective (a person is either of a certain age, or is not) and easy to understand, and anything better seems unlikely to present itself.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 348 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group