The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:13 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Courtmartialling an SAS sniper for having a Glock will really help them have a gun-free, nonviolent society, I'm sure.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/07/01/evidence-to-be-presented-in-sas-sniper-court-martial/?intcmp=obinsite

Quote:
LONDON (AFP) – Former SAS sniper Danny Nightingale will on Tuesday face the first day of evidence against him at a military court, where he is accused of illegally possessing a pistol and ammunition.

Nightingale was initially found guilty of illegally possessing a Glock 9mm pistol and almost 300 live rounds of ammunition but won an appeal following a public campaign led by his wife, Sally.

The soldier will appear at the military court centre in Bulford, Wiltshire, where present and former members of British special forces are due to give evidence.

Judge Advocate General Jeff Blackett will allow certain witnesses at the court martial to be identified by a letter rather than their name and to give evidence from behind a screen.

Nightingale, a member of the Duke of Lancaster's Regiment, spoke to confirm his identity on the court martial's opening day Monday.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:40 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
While I feel sad for him and think Britain's gun laws are horrid, he should be subject to the same laws as everyone else, right?

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Why should he not be punished for breaking the law?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:00 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
No one said that he shouldn't. The absurdity is in the law in the first place.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:30 pm 
Offline
Eatin yur toes.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:49 am
Posts: 836
The case is an interesting one. As I understand it the driver behind the prosecution is the military, for bringing pistol and ammo into residence; public opinions squarely behind him, and he's been acquitted once already. He must have really pissed off his officers over something


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:04 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
If he's been acquitted once, how is he still being prosecuted? Do you have double jeopardy protection in the UK?

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 336 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group