The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:01 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 ... 47  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:26 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Nobody has presented any evidence of any provocation at all.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Talya wrote:
Nobody has presented any evidence of any provocation at all.


Much less "provoke someone into defending themself." Initiating an assault is not defending yourself.

Even if Martin fealt threatened, he started the fight. That is, as far as I know, not in dispute.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Coren wrote:
George got out of the vehicle in response to being asked where Trayvon was running, and the dispatcher testified that though that wasn't his intent, he understood how asking such a question could be interpreted as a request to get out to find the answer.

...When Noffke realized George was following and advised him to stop, George agreed. There is no evidence George continued to follow after that. In fact, he spent the rest of the call not knowing where Trayvon was, and got attacked in nearly the exact same spot George agreed to not follow...about 10-15 seconds jog from George's truck.

Coren wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
more importantly, Zimmerman's claim that he was just looking for an address rather than following Martin into the cut-through

That is actually evidenced on the NEN call, George just got events out of order. He gets out of the vehicle in response to being asked where Trayvon is running. 17 seconds later, he agrees he doesn't have to follow, and then indicates he lost Trayvon ("he ran".). Noffke asks about an address where George is at, while George is at the T intersection, and George says he doesn't know, because he is in a cut through, and at the T only the backs of houses are visible. I think that's what prompted George to continue to RVC for an address.

Yeah, I just went back and re-listened to the NEN call (by the way, love the "NEN" acronym!) to refresh my memory on the timing of things. Here's a link to the NEN call, if anyone's interested. Anyway, here's why I think Zimmerman's lying (or, more generously, "misremembering") about just looking for an address rather than following Martin into the cut-through:

Rough timeline of key moments during NEN call (times reflect counter of linked audio above)
    2:10: Zimmerman gets out of car and walks into cut-through in response to dispatcher's query about which direction Martin is running.
    2:28: Dispatcher says there's no need to follow. Zimmerman says, "OK."
    2:58: Dispatcher asks where Zimmerman wants to meet the cops, and Zimmerman starts giving directions to his truck.
    3:20: Dispatcher asks what address Zimmerman's truck is parked in front of. Zimmerman replies that he doesn't know because it's in a cut-through.
    3:42: Dispatcher suggests meeting by the mailboxes near the Clubhouse. Zimmerman agrees.
    3:50: Zimmerman changes his mind and asks dispatcher to have the cops call him when they arrive and he'll tell them where he is at that time. Dispatcher agrees.
    4:05: Call ends.

Portion of Wiki timeline following NEN call (times reflect actual local time)
    7:13:41 — Zimmerman's call to Sanford police ends.
    7:16:00 - 7:16:59 — Martin's call from the girl goes dead during this minute.
    7:16:11 — First 911 call from witness about a fight, calls for help heard.
    7:16:55 — Gunshot heard on 911 call.

So, roughly 18 seconds elapsed (2:10-2:28) between the moment Zimmerman got out of his car and the moment he acknowledged that the dispatcher said not to follow Martin. From that point to the point where the dispatcher asks for the address of Zimmerman's truck, and Zimmerman responds that he doesn't have the address because he's in the cut-through, is 52 seconds (2:28-3:20). It only took him 18 seconds to get from his truck to the point where he was told not to follow, but 52 seconds later, he's still in the cut-through, and he hadn't yet been asked for an address, so that's not why he was lingering in there for those 52 seconds.

The dispatcher then suggests that Zimmerman just meet the cops at the mailboxes, but Zimmerman wants them to call when they arrive so he can just tell them where he is at that time (during this back-and-forth, another 45 seconds go by (3:20-4:05), and Zimmerman still hasn't left the cut-through. Finally, based on the Wiki timeline, from the moment the call ends to the moment the confrontation with Martin occurs is another 2-2.5 minutes (7:13:41 - approx. 7:16), and he still hasn't left the cut-through.

So, it was only 18 seconds between when Zimmerman left his car and when the dispatcher told him not to follow Martin, but he stayed in the cut-through for another 3.5-4 minutes. Why did he linger so long? Even if you allow for some indecision on his part when the dispatcher asked for the address of his truck at 3:20, why was he still in the cut-through at that point anyway? Why does he want the cops to call and get his location when they arrive instead of just meeting them at the mailboxes like the dispatcher suggested at 3:42? Why was he still in the cut-through a full 2-2.5 minutes after the NEN call ended? It seems pretty obvious to me that he was hanging around in there to see if he could spot Martin.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:01 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
RangerDave wrote:
Coren wrote:
George got out of the vehicle in response to being asked where Trayvon was running, and the dispatcher testified that though that wasn't his intent, he understood how asking such a question could be interpreted as a request to get out to find the answer.

...When Noffke realized George was following and advised him to stop, George agreed. There is no evidence George continued to follow after that. In fact, he spent the rest of the call not knowing where Trayvon was, and got attacked in nearly the exact same spot George agreed to not follow...about 10-15 seconds jog from George's truck.

Coren wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
more importantly, Zimmerman's claim that he was just looking for an address rather than following Martin into the cut-through

That is actually evidenced on the NEN call, George just got events out of order. He gets out of the vehicle in response to being asked where Trayvon is running. 17 seconds later, he agrees he doesn't have to follow, and then indicates he lost Trayvon ("he ran".). Noffke asks about an address where George is at, while George is at the T intersection, and George says he doesn't know, because he is in a cut through, and at the T only the backs of houses are visible. I think that's what prompted George to continue to RVC for an address.

Yeah, I just went back and re-listened to the NEN call (by the way, love the "NEN" acronym!) to refresh my memory on the timing of things. Here's a link to the NEN call, if anyone's interested. Anyway, here's why I think Zimmerman's lying (or, more generously, "misremembering") about just looking for an address rather than following Martin into the cut-through:

Rough timeline of key moments during NEN call (times reflect counter of linked audio above)
    2:10: Zimmerman gets out of car and walks into cut-through in response to dispatcher's query about which direction Martin is running.
    2:28: Dispatcher says there's no need to follow. Zimmerman says, "OK."
    2:58: Dispatcher asks where Zimmerman wants to meet the cops, and Zimmerman starts giving directions to his truck.
    3:20: Dispatcher asks what address Zimmerman's truck is parked in front of. Zimmerman replies that he doesn't know because it's in a cut-through.
    3:42: Dispatcher suggests meeting by the mailboxes near the Clubhouse. Zimmerman agrees.
    3:50: Zimmerman changes his mind and asks dispatcher to have the cops call him when they arrive and he'll tell them where he is at that time. Dispatcher agrees.
    4:05: Call ends.

Portion of Wiki timeline following NEN call (times reflect actual local time)
    7:13:41 — Zimmerman's call to Sanford police ends.
    7:16:00 - 7:16:59 — Martin's call from the girl goes dead during this minute.
    7:16:11 — First 911 call from witness about a fight, calls for help heard.
    7:16:55 — Gunshot heard on 911 call.

So, roughly 18 seconds elapsed (2:10-2:28) between the moment Zimmerman got out of his car and the moment he acknowledged that the dispatcher said not to follow Martin. From that point to the point where the dispatcher asks for the address of Zimmerman's truck, and Zimmerman responds that he doesn't have the address because he's in the cut-through, is 52 seconds (2:28-3:20). It only took him 18 seconds to get from his truck to the point where he was told not to follow, but 52 seconds later, he's still in the cut-through, and he hadn't yet been asked for an address, so that's not why he was lingering in there for those 52 seconds.

The dispatcher then suggests that Zimmerman just meet the cops at the mailboxes, but Zimmerman wants them to call when they arrive so he can just tell them where he is at that time (during this back-and-forth, another 45 seconds go by (3:20-4:05), and Zimmerman still hasn't left the cut-through. Finally, based on the Wiki timeline, from the moment the call ends to the moment the confrontation with Martin occurs is another 2-2.5 minutes (7:13:41 - approx. 7:16), and he still hasn't left the cut-through.

So, it was only 18 seconds between when Zimmerman left his car and when the dispatcher told him not to follow Martin, but he stayed in the cut-through for another 3.5-4 minutes. Why did he linger so long? Even if you allow for some indecision on his part when the dispatcher asked for the address of his truck at 3:20, why was he still in the cut-through at that point anyway? Why does he want the cops to call and get his location when they arrive instead of just meeting them at the mailboxes like the dispatcher suggested at 3:42? Why was he still in the cut-through a full 2-2.5 minutes after the NEN call ended? It seems pretty obvious to me that he was hanging around in there to see if he could spot Martin.



And yet, the law all agree that Zim has remained consistant, does not think he is lying, and didn't want to press charges in the first place. Them > you.

Also...
Quote:
when the dispatcher told him not to follow Martin
. Please stop saying this. It isn't true. In fact there has been testimony that the way the 911 person worded things could have led Zim to believe that they wanted him to follow Martin.


Quote:
Claim 3: George Zimmerman got out of his truck and followed Trayvon Martin, even though the police told him not to do so

This is a contention made both by the prosecution and the court of public opinion, but this contention is not based on fact or evidence.

George Zimmerman called the police NEN and spoke with dispatcher Sean Noffke. Noffke stated that he did not tell Zimmerman not to follow Martin, as they are trained to not make comments that sound like commands. His exact words:

We don’t need you to do that.

Noffke further stated during his testimony that by asking Zimmerman which way Martin was going, Zimmerman could have reasonably interpreted this as being asked to follow Martin.



http://pjmedia.com/blog/deconstructing- ... -to-argue/


I highly suggest you read that article. It should blow up any argument you want to make.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:10 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Nitefox, stop sourcing a blog as a newsource its like citing a post here as a source.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:13 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Hopwin wrote:
Nitefox, stop sourcing a blog as a newsource.



When did I say it was a newscource? Is anything within those articles incorrect(that isn't opinion)? They are laying out the case pretty much word for word with the exception of adding their own opinion. If you don't like it, don't read it. Pretty simple.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:33 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
My problem is that it is literally the only source you cite anymore.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Hopwin wrote:
My problem is that it is literally the only source you cite anymore.


But all conservative bloggers only spout God's honest truth! Didn't you know?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:59 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Hopwin wrote:
My problem is that it is literally the only source you cite anymore.



Why is that a problem for you? Do you actually read any of the articles I post? Other than the right leaning opinions, everything else is fact. Sourced and linked fact at that.

They have many different folks that write articles for the site. I get different view points. A good many of the writers are former leftys/libs, which gives me hope that people like RD and Azile will one day come around.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:03 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
My problem is that it is literally the only source you cite anymore.


But all conservative bloggers only spout God's honest truth! Didn't you know?



Translation: "Other than the right leaning opinions, I can't find fault with the site. So I'll just make a snarky comment and keep basing my opinion about things by how they make me feel and if they make Obama look good. Hmmm...where's that kool-aid at...I feel fact, truth and common sense creeping in."

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Hopwin wrote:
Nitefox, stop sourcing a blog as a newsource its like citing a post here as a source.


That being the case, an external link to a blog is just as relevant as a post by an individual here, and carries just as much weight. It's up to you as the consumer to determine it's validity and relevance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:21 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Hopwin wrote:
Nitefox, stop sourcing a blog as a newsource its like citing a post here as a source.


Source notwithstanding, the specifically cited portion is correct.


As to the timeline: I find that interesting. How do we know that's when Martin's phone "went dead?"

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:28 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Nitefox wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
My problem is that it is literally the only source you cite anymore.



Why is that a problem for you? Do you actually read any of the articles I post? Other than the right leaning opinions, everything else is fact. Sourced and linked fact at that.

They have many different folks that write articles for the site. I get different view points. A good many of the writers are former leftys/libs, which gives me hope that people like RD and Azile will one day come around.

My problem is we can replace you with a permanent link to pjmedia. Do a quick search and count how many times you dump a link to that site into posts without a word. If you want to be in the discussion, then please join in.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:59 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Hopwin wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
My problem is that it is literally the only source you cite anymore.



Why is that a problem for you? Do you actually read any of the articles I post? Other than the right leaning opinions, everything else is fact. Sourced and linked fact at that.

They have many different folks that write articles for the site. I get different view points. A good many of the writers are former leftys/libs, which gives me hope that people like RD and Azile will one day come around.

My problem is we can replace you with a permanent link to pjmedia. Do a quick search and count how many times you dump a link to that site into posts without a word. If you want to be in the discussion, then please join in.



Ah, so we can only post and site things that you approve first. Thanks, but I'll continue to do things the way I want. If you have a problem with that, the ignore feature is your friend.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:09 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Er... well that's an interesting take on an invitation to join the conversation.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:37 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Haha, right? It's not like there are 24 matches for Nitefox posting links to pjmedia or anything.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:03 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
RangerDave wrote:
Map, etc...
So, that's about it. Anything about that description that you guys think is disputed or mistaken?


I'm sorry, I thought that the "Cut-through" you were referencing was people's yards and such, not a sidewalk. I guess if there's a place a man can get beaten for walking on a sidewalk, and go to prison for defending himself, I don't want to live there. /shrug

The maps were cool though, thanks.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:05 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Hopwin wrote:
Er... well that's an interesting take on an invitation to join the conversation.


I'm very much in the conversation. What conversation are you in?

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:06 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Vindicarre wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
Map, etc...
So, that's about it. Anything about that description that you guys think is disputed or mistaken?


I'm sorry, I thought that the "Cut-through" you were referencing was people's yards and such, not a sidewalk.


I was definitely right there with you. That and "chasing somebody behind houses" didn't imply going down a clear sidewalk toward which front doors face.

I just didn't want to get into nomenclature battles.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:07 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Lenas wrote:
Haha, right? It's not like there are 24 matches for Nitefox posting links to pjmedia or anything.



Again, why does this matter? I get most of my news from there. So? If they are wrong about something, feel free to point it out. If not, again...I'm confused why you guys are getting your collective panties in a twist about it.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:10 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
I didn't know laughing at something meant my panties were in a twist.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:30 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Lenas wrote:
I didn't know laughing at something meant my panties were in a twist.


Oh haha. Yeah. That really was funny. Ho ho. Ha ha. Side hurts.


Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4 Beta

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:30 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
I assumed Lenas was laughing at me.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:59 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
RangerDave wrote:
It's extremely important to remember here that Martin was completely innocent of any wrongdoing right up to the moment he swung at Zimmerman, so Zimmerman pursued and placed in fear a completely innocent person based on some vague and subjective suspicions. That innocent person reacted badly to the provocation and might himself have been charged with assault had he lived, but the rightfulness or wrongfulness of Zimmerman's precipitating actions doesn't depend on the rightfulness or wrongfulness of Martin's eventual reaction.


The fact that Martin wasn't doing anything wrong isn't something we need to remember, it's irrelevant. In fact, it's beyond irrelevant; it's a fact that legally cannot be considered, and we really should not consider in our discussions here.

A person's actions cannot be judged in hindsight on the basis of information they did not have and could not reasonably have had at the time. Zimmerman saw someone he considered suspicious. Had Martin been on his way to burglarize a place, that would not make him at the time Zimmerman saw him any more suspicious just because he eventually turned out to be a criminal. In reality, he was not on his way to do any such thing, and by the same token that does not in any way impeach Zimmerman's actions or suspicions.

Second, "putting someone in fear" is not meaningful. Zimmerman was not engaging in any action that reasonably could be called a provocation, or any sort of imminent or clear threat towards Martin. Martin, at most, had cause to be suspicious of Zimmerman. That's all. This is no different that Zimmerman being suspicious of Martin; in fact, both had about equally strong reasons to be suspicious of the other. The difference is Zimmerman called the police; Martin called some idiot girl he knew and then started a confrontation. The simple fact is, however, that stupid as Zimmerman's actions may have been, they never rose to the level that would remotely justify self-defense by Martin. Martin's eventualy total overreaction is not evidence that Zimmerman acted unreasonably in the first place.

As for the "B movie embellishments" Martin was supposedly engaged in, kids talk like that a lot trying to sound tough. Most likely they learn a lot of it from movies, and it's hardly theatrical or an obvious embellishment at all.
Quote:
So, roughly 18 seconds elapsed (2:10-2:28) between the moment Zimmerman got out of his car and the moment he acknowledged that the dispatcher said not to follow Martin. From that point to the point where the dispatcher asks for the address of Zimmerman's truck, and Zimmerman responds that he doesn't have the address because he's in the cut-through, is 52 seconds (2:28-3:20). It only took him 18 seconds to get from his truck to the point where he was told not to follow, but 52 seconds later, he's still in the cut-through, and he hadn't yet been asked for an address, so that's not why he was lingering in there for those 52 seconds.

The dispatcher then suggests that Zimmerman just meet the cops at the mailboxes, but Zimmerman wants them to call when they arrive so he can just tell them where he is at that time (during this back-and-forth, another 45 seconds go by (3:20-4:05), and Zimmerman still hasn't left the cut-through. Finally, based on the Wiki timeline, from the moment the call ends to the moment the confrontation with Martin occurs is another 2-2.5 minutes (7:13:41 - approx. 7:16), and he still hasn't left the cut-through.

So, it was only 18 seconds between when Zimmerman left his car and when the dispatcher told him not to follow Martin, but he stayed in the cut-through for another 3.5-4 minutes. Why did he linger so long? Even if you allow for some indecision on his part when the dispatcher asked for the address of his truck at 3:20, why was he still in the cut-through at that point anyway? Why does he want the cops to call and get his location when they arrive instead of just meeting them at the mailboxes like the dispatcher suggested at 3:42? Why was he still in the cut-through a full 2-2.5 minutes after the NEN call ended? It seems pretty obvious to me that he was hanging around in there to see if he could spot Martin.


There isn't any particular reason Zimmerman should have left the cut-through. Furthermore, if he was "hanging around to see" Martin, that greatly weakens the position that he was in any way pursuing, chasing, or following Martin, and if he was hanging out there, that pretty much requires Martin to approach him and start the confrontation.

This is making it look like Martin was not in fear, he was pissed that some "white" guy was following him.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:12 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Nitefox wrote:
Oh haha. Yeah. That really was funny. Ho ho. Ha ha. Side hurts.


Someone's got their panties in a knot. I laugh at whatever I find funny, and right now what I'm finding funny is you admitting your main source of news is a blog after having harped on Monte for years about doing that kind of stuff. Ho ho!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 ... 47  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 203 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group