Midgen wrote:
Singling out this guy isn't going to fix a broken system.
Just like any other social payout system, it's vulnerable to abuse. Calling the abusers out won't change a damned thing.
Reason # 4,832 that social systems run by the government will always fail.
Absolutely true. However, I would say that it's very important to provide this guy (or someone like him; he just happened to be the one present at the time) as an example, so that the public can see that it is not just a matter of veterans getting abused by the system, but of some of them abusing the system as well. The fact that the system invites and encourages fraud does not excuse people that are committing it.
Quote:
Edit:
Military Veterans do not get to arbitrarily pick their disability rating out of a hat. There is an evaluation process you go through. Once that evaluation is complete, it's reviewed by the blue coats at the VA.
If this guy is getting 40% disability for a sprained ankle, like the nice lady implied, it's because that's how the system is set up.
Why isn't she railing on the people who manage the broken system instead of the people who are taking advantage of it?
Maybe it has something to do with
who she is. Leiutenat Colonel Duckworth has some pretty severe service-connected disability herself, and from causes unquestionably of a legitimate nature. Some of her ire no doubt is personal anger at someone who games the system standing right before her. Part of changing the system is calling people like this out, so that when the system IS changed, those people cannot go to the press and scream "ZOMG THE GOVERNMENT IS DENYING DISABLED VETS THEIR BENEFITS!!" You know the sort pof people I'm talking about, too. People feel entitled to disability money, and they will fight tooth and nail to keep it if the system is reformed. In any case, I can definitely forgive her for a little personal anger, based on what she's suffered. If it were you ranting at the guy, I'd cut you some slack too.