Midgen wrote:
{snip}
Bad weather excluded, as it is now, the PAT is just a waste of time. They might as well just make the Touchdown worth 7 points, with the option to run a play to score the 8th.
{snip}
Hopwin wrote:
{snipped quote]
I thought the plan was TD = automatic 7, if you opt to go for two you can get 8 if you make it or lose one (net 6 pts) if the attempt fails?
I would think it would have to be what Hop is suggesting. If it's an automatic 7 with the option to try to score another point, that's what every team would do. There has to be some disincentive to going for the 2.
Of course, there was always Lane Kiffin, former USC coach, who repeatedly would go for 2-point conversions when there was no need to. Like, on the first TD of the game. It was weird.
Ah, here's an example:
Yahoo Sports in 2010 wrote:
USC 49, Hawaii 36. At the beginning of the night, Hawaii time, it looked like the story from the islands was going to be USC's bizarre and unexplained decision to go for two following each of its first three touchdowns en route to the expected blowout: The Trojans scored the first three times they touched the ball, on extended drives of 79, 73 and 69 yards, and coach Lane Kiffin seemed hell-bent on cementing his USC debut in the sports wing of the Unprintable Name Hall of Fame by eschewing the conventional PAT on all of them, for no apparent reason other than he can.
I didn't realize he had taken it to that extreme.
Edit: Jeez, never checked to see that I had screwed up the quote.