The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
Yeah, multiple warnings, prior suspensions, back on grace, and throwing warnings by a moderator back in their face....

Nitefox has been suspended for 1 month, with the possibility of a permanent ban on review.

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:08 am
Posts: 906
Jeebus! I intentionally stayed out of this topic, and it still turned into WW3. :D

Just let it go........let it go........it go......go...........g


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:28 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Lenas wrote:
Amanar wrote:
I challenge anyone in this thread to prove the Universe is 13.8 billion years old without an appeal to authority.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

Unfortunately none of us has the millions of dollars required nor do we have observatories placed at high altitudes throughout the world. What we do have is data collected from scientists of many nations that we can look at and come to conclusions for ourselves. For areas in which we may not be experts, we listen to arguments both for and against, and decide which makes the most sense to us. I don't think any of us is stupid enough to believe that the universe is 13.8 billion years because anyone said so, but because many people have submitted analyses of the deep universe that all seem to agree and make sense.

It is the height of folly to postulate that because Lenas is personally unable to prove the age of the universe, that it must necessarily be an appeal to authority to assert any such age. It is no more an appeal to authority than reading an email when one is personally unable to demonstrate the routing path that it took to reach you.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:24 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Nitefox wrote:
Müs wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Müs wrote:
Mainly its because religious people are easily mocked. Low hanging fruit if you will.



When did you become such an *******?


Become?

I kinda always have been. Especially where religion is involved. Like Unions, it has served its purpose, and can be phased out. Its actively holding back humanity's progress.



You know and that's fine if you want to think that, but seriously. You used to not be such the *******.


To be fair, I'm only an ******* in here. Its part of my idiom.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
That's exactly what you did here.

Actually, that's not what I did. The comic doesn't mock people for being religious; it mocks them for being disingenuous assholes. Big difference. For example, switch it to something non-religious. Instead of a religious person talking about Christian love, make it a caricature of a liberal going on about how important it is to not discriminate against people, to treat everyone as equals, etc., etc., while at the same time linking those ideals to support for affirmative action, race-specific scholarships, hate crimes legislation, etc. The woman responds, "You're an *******," and, he shoots back that she's a racist. That wouldn't be mocking liberals generally for being liberals; it would be mocking the (arguably) obvious inconsistency between the guy's paeans to equality and his racially-discriminatory policy preferences.


Whatever makes you feel better.

Quote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Which brings me back to my original point. Funny or not, witty or not, you posted something you knew would get a rise from folks on the board, then walked away from the thread to let it run its course. This is trolling. It is fine to do so, don't get me wrong, but it's pretty blatant.

On the contrary, before I posted the OP, I debated whether it should even go into Hellfire. Last time I posted a thread poking fun at anti-gay sentiments, people wondered why I didn't just post it in the General forum. That time, it was just habit, but this time, I consciously decided I'd better Hellfire it just in case the religious angle got someone's back up (which...surprise!...it did), but I figured it was 50/50 that people would just shrug again. No one here is really anti-gay, so I thought folks might just see the comic for what it is: a send-up of disingenuous assholes who cloak their bigotry in lip-service about Christian love, not of Christians generally. Apparently not though.


So you posted it in Hellfire because you thought it might get a rise from people on the board. But you weren't trolling. Ok.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Nitefox wrote:
Müs wrote:
Mainly its because religious people are easily mocked. Low hanging fruit if you will.



When did you become such an *******?


I don't think he is, he's just trolling because, I guess, he's bored.

Don't fall for it.

Edit:
Quote:
To be fair, I'm only an ******* in here. Its part of my idiom.


Yep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:04 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Here, and the Elder Scrolls forum.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:19 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Corolinth wrote:
Lenas wrote:
Amanar wrote:
I challenge anyone in this thread to prove the Universe is 13.8 billion years old without an appeal to authority.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

Unfortunately none of us has the millions of dollars required nor do we have observatories placed at high altitudes throughout the world. What we do have is data collected from scientists of many nations that we can look at and come to conclusions for ourselves. For areas in which we may not be experts, we listen to arguments both for and against, and decide which makes the most sense to us. I don't think any of us is stupid enough to believe that the universe is 13.8 billion years because anyone said so, but because many people have submitted analyses of the deep universe that all seem to agree and make sense.

It is the height of folly to postulate that because Lenas is personally unable to prove the age of the universe, that it must necessarily be an appeal to authority to assert any such age. It is no more an appeal to authority than reading an email when one is personally unable to demonstrate the routing path that it took to reach you.


While that's quite true, the issue came up in response to people saying they "know" certain things. It was established long ago that it's perfectly acceptable in this forum to drag things off into the philosophical "but you don't KNOW that's true!" realm of philosophical masturbation when someone claims to just "know" something based on their personal certainty. Monty used to get bombarded with that all the time, although he was not the only one; quite a lot of threads fell victim to it.

Therefore, it's really not problematic that Amanar went off into that territory as well. You're right about the appeal to authority, but by the same token, people are claiming they "know" stuff with the same casual "I feel like it must be true therefore it is" that Monty used to get dogpiled for, and they're avoiding the same treatment becuase their arguments are more popular.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
So you posted it in Hellfire because you thought it might get a rise from people on the board. But you weren't trolling. Ok.

I posted something that I thought was funny and insightful and did a good job of light-heartedly getting at the crux of an issue that I'd been thinking about recently, but because I knew there was a chance a few people on the board might get all butthurt because the object of the satire is religious, that makes it trolling? Please.


Last edited by RangerDave on Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Diamondeye wrote:
Except that no one I can think of really claims they're being oppressed because someone doesn't like their anti-gay belief. When Christians claim they're being oppressed, (disregarding the accuracy or lack thereof of that claim) it tends to revolve around being forced to pay for things they object to, either directly or through tax dollars. Either that, or it revolves around attempts to get Christian smbols removed from some venue or other because of sensitive feelings. No one claims they're being oppresed if gay people think they're assholes for opposing gay marriage or gay sex.

Your comic is taking two unrelated matters and linking them in a very disingenuous manner.

Actually, I came across the comic in the course of following a series of blog debates centered on posts from prominent Catholic bloggers Ross Douthat and Rod Dreher complaining about exactly that. Their complaint is that they oppose gay marriage and think homosexuality is inherently sinful because of their religious convictions, not because they have any personal hatred or animus toward gays - indeed, their religious convictions also require them to love and pray for the souls of gay people - so it's terribly unfair and intolerant for people to call them bigots, and the kind of social ostracism and career risks faced by those who espouse such Christian beliefs constitutes a form of "persecution" (Dreher's own word for it). The comic is a direct send-up of that argument.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
Diamondeye wrote:
Corolinth wrote:
It is the height of folly to postulate that because Lenas is personally unable to prove the age of the universe, that it must necessarily be an appeal to authority to assert any such age. It is no more an appeal to authority than reading an email when one is personally unable to demonstrate the routing path that it took to reach you.


While that's quite true, the issue came up in response to people saying they "know" certain things. It was established long ago that it's perfectly acceptable in this forum to drag things off into the philosophical "but you don't KNOW that's true!" realm of philosophical masturbation when someone claims to just "know" something based on their personal certainty. Monty used to get bombarded with that all the time, although he was not the only one; quite a lot of threads fell victim to it.

Therefore, it's really not problematic that Amanar went off into that territory as well. You're right about the appeal to authority, but by the same token, people are claiming they "know" stuff with the same casual "I feel like it must be true therefore it is" that Monty used to get dogpiled for, and they're avoiding the same treatment becuase their arguments are more popular.


I'm not trying to derail this thread into philosophical masturbation. I'm not suggesting that we don't "know" anything. I'm just pointing out that the evidence for the age of the universe and a bunch of other scientific claims is the same kind of evidence many religious people use for their belief in God. There's nothing wrong with an appeal to authority in any of these instances. I trust the authority of scientists and those who have studied the sciences extensively about the nature of the universe, and many religious people trust the authority of the Bible or the Pope or other religious experts/leaders on the true nature of God and the universe.

I just think it's wrong to dismiss the religion and the Bible out of hand. It's evidence just like anything else. If you don't find it compelling, so be it. But it's not fiction.

On another note, many of you don't seem to grasp how little we understand about physics and the nature of the universe. We have two main theories in physics that are incredibly well researched and supported by observational evidence, and they explain 99% of what we see in the universe. Yet they are fundamentally incompatible with each other. One of them is necessarily wrong. How's that any different than all these Biblical inconsistencies?

And then the most popular resolution to this conflict is String Theory, which is not falsifiable and shows no possibility of evidence being able to support it in the near future. Physicists must simply have faith in it as a neat, beautiful explanation of why things are the way they are. It's eerily similar to religion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:06 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Diamondeye wrote:
Here, and the Elder Scrolls forum.


No, I'm just honest in there.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Timmit wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
Where do you get the idea that anyone would think someone putting up a "there is no God" sign in his house would be obnoxious to anyone? Or at least, any more so than someone putting crosses up in their house would be obnoxious to some people here.

To be fair, I would find the "there is no god" signs pretty obnoxious while being fine with crosses or any other religion's symbols. I'm an atheist (or agnostic, whatever, the label argument is exhausting) and the only reason I can imagine for putting up no god signs is low grade douchebag attempts to bother any person of faith who might visit.

Ditto, actually. I have to admit that I tend to find vocal atheists much more annoying and obnoxious than vocal religious people, all things being equal, mostly because I feel like vocal atheists tend to assert their belief in the absence of God as a way of saying, "I'm smarter than you," whereas vocal religious people tend to assert their beliefs because they honestly want to "spread the good news", as it were. That's just in terms of people proselytizing, mind you, not people trying to impose their beliefs via violent intimidation or legal coercion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
So you posted it in Hellfire because you thought it might get a rise from people on the board. But you weren't trolling. Ok.

I posted something that I thought was funny and insightful and did a good job of light-heartedly getting at the crux of an issue that I'd been thinking about recently, but because I knew there was a chance a few people on the board might get all butthurt because the object of the satire is religious, that makes it trolling? Please.


Well, I hope you are happy with what you have done. I think you owe theRiov, Aizle, DE, and Nitefox an apology.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:35 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
I'd much prefer that everyone keep their religious nonsense to themselves. Atheists included.

Maybe if we could shut the **** up about the bullshit, society could move forward in a meaningful manner.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:36 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Müs wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Here, and the Elder Scrolls forum.


No, I'm just honest in there.


Honestly wrong, maybe.

Quote:
I'd much prefer that everyone keep their religious nonsense to themselves. Atheists included.

Maybe if we could shut the **** up about the bullshit, society could move forward in a meaningful manner.


By all means, have at it. No one's stopping you.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:43 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Amanar wrote:
I'm not trying to derail this thread into philosophical masturbation. I'm not suggesting that we don't "know" anything.


It wasn't so much a matter of what you were doing as what used to happen when people did this sort of thing in the past.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:58 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Diamondeye wrote:
Müs wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Here, and the Elder Scrolls forum.


No, I'm just honest in there.


Honestly wrong, maybe.


I can't be wrong about my own opinion and observations. I think its a terrible game that will not be enjoyable for me. There's no wrongness in that. I think that PVP focused games have generally suffered in the endgame, this is also not wrong. I think that I despise PvP and the general PvPer culture. This is also not wrong.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Well, I hope you are happy with what you have done. I think you owe theRiov, Aizle, DE, and Nitefox an apology.

Now I'm starting to think you're just trolling me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
So you posted it in Hellfire because you thought it might get a rise from people on the board. But you weren't trolling. Ok.

I posted something that I thought was funny and insightful and did a good job of light-heartedly getting at the crux of an issue that I'd been thinking about recently, but because I knew there was a chance a few people on the board might get all butthurt because the object of the satire is religious, that makes it trolling? Please.


Well, I hope you are happy with what you have done. I think you owe theRiov, Aizle, DE, and Nitefox an apology.


I don't post here a lot, but I would really hope that this is sarcasm. If not... I really don't know how to interpret it.

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:47 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Müs wrote:
I can't be wrong about my own opinion and observations. I think its a terrible game that will not be enjoyable for me. There's no wrongness in that. I think that PVP focused games have generally suffered in the endgame, this is also not wrong. I think that I despise PvP and the general PvPer culture. This is also not wrong.


No no. You're definitely wrong.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Heh.

Well played.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Can we just lock this thread now please? It's never going to place nicely on the rails.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heh. Pretty much.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:35 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
What rails? There was hardly a point when it started.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
No amount of cute animal pics in the random picture thread can offset the asshatery going on in here...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 242 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group