Lenas wrote:
Don't act like Star Trek can only be what you want it to be :/ Things need to adapt.
Unless you'd prefer the Trek franchise to fade off into obscurity and never be recreated for a new audience.
FarSky wrote:
Yeah, it's not exactly like anything since TNG captured the public consciousness, except in unification of belief that the Enterprise theme song sucked balls.
Abrams did the impossible and made me interested in Star Trek. He then kinda blew it, but still.
Nonsense.
Star Trek always was fairly solid speculative science fiction, whereas Abrams reboot was a Space Opera.
Battle in Star Trek was generally patterned after WWII submarine suspense movies, as opposed to an action movie. Abrams reboot is just a Sci-Fantasy action flick.
Note there's nothing wrong with Sci-Fantasy, Space Opera action flicks. I've always preferred the Star Wars, which is all of those things, to Star Trek. But making Star Trek into it as well is clearly against the entire spirit of the franchise. It'd be like turning James Bond movies into a Sherman Brothers musical with dancing cartoon penguins. You can claim "Things need to adapt," but anyone who said it was still a James Bond movie would be smoking something strong.
As for "capturing the public consciousness," well, that's hardly a prerequisite for any of this. The new ones didn't, either. Let's just say Browncoats like you and I, FarSky, are far, far fewer in number than Trekkies, by a factor of hundreds, perhaps thousands, and yet we will heap only praise on Whedon's masterpiece. And someone who tried to make a live version of it "on ice" would not be regarded fondly by either of us.