Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Luke flew his T-16 back home all the time; it's presented as an analogous situation in the film even if you ignore the legends canon that indicated that the X-Wing's proper name is the T-65 because they're both Incom designs and share a lot of similarity in controls and cockpit layout. Also, remember that Lucas was all about car culture -- this is meant to echo a teenager taking his small-town street racing experience with his own hot rod and stepping up to the big race, not leveraging tractor-driving experience to magically pilot a jet fighter. As for hyperspace -- R2 did all the astrogation, that's what astromechs are there for.
Actually no, it isn't presented as an analogous situation in the film. The whomp rat is presented as a same-sized target, and the entire exchange could be just as much youthful exuberance and overconfidence on Luke's part as it does any relevant experience. What Lucas was "into" really is entirely irrelevant, as is what it's supposed to represent. What we SEE on screen is a kid who's flown a Cessna and you arguing that he can therefore fly an F-15 and it has nothing to do with him being a force sensitive and everything to do with his teenage experience. Granted, the Boeing is not made by Cessna, but they both have altimeters so it must be the same.
This is, of course, all ignoring the fact that whomp rats
do not **** shoot back. This is Luke's first time flying against emeny pilots, or under fire in the air at all as far as we know. Being under fire is significant for reasons I shouldn't have to explain.
Quote:
If you go back and watch the trench run, and think about it a bit... I think it's fair to suggest that there wasn't much evading to go on in the first place. The wingmen are providing cover by hanging back far enough to engage any opposition that tries to tail the leader directly; that turns out to be a pretty significant distance, to the point where the TIEs have to play catch-up to be in range of Luke, rather than trying to get a solid shot that whole time. To illustrate how big a distance it is, whenever Biggs, Wedge, or Red Leaders' wingmen's X-Wings are shown in the trench, Luke or Red Leader are never even close enough to see. When Vader kills Biggs and declares he's on the leader, the TIEs are shown from behind, with no X-Wing in sight. Luke doesn't evade fire, he stalls it with the bold decision to go in full throttle in order to do the X-Wing's best to outrun the TIEs for as long as possible. Again, this is racing, not dogfighting.
If I go back and watch the trench run a bit and think about it - which I have, extensively - I think you are not paying much attention. Yes, the wingmen are hanging back; the X-wings use flights of 3 and the leader attacks while his wingmen cover him - it's Japanese WWII tactics, or Soviet tactics as opposed to 2-plane sections in Western air forces. IT is not racing because people do not SHOOT AT YOU in races.
The problem is they are IN A TRENCH so the TIEs can drop in behind and kill all of them. As for the idea that he is not dodging, that's blatantly wrong - he is all over the place, and Vader has significant difficulty locking onto him with his targeter. He doesn't successfully lock until the exact moment the Falcon shows up - much longer than it took against the other ships.
This is due to Luke's force sensitivity - the same Force sensitivity Ren has, which accounts for the Mary Sue aspects people are complaining about.
The trench is wide enough for 2 ships abreast, maybe 3, so SOME maneuvering is both possible and evident. If you actually think it isn't, you're either not paying attention or just coming up with excuses to claim Luke is different than Ren because reasons.
Quote:
Finally, I find your argument about Kylo Ren preparing for blaster fire instead of lightsaber combat to be lacking... because he does a pretty shitty job of that, too, when the time comes and somebody actually shoots AT him -- with a lightsaber in hand, no less.
Does he now?
Well, he seems to do just fine against a surprise blaster shot in the opening scenes.. what's different in the later one?
Aside from the fact that it's a bowcaster- and no, "Canon" doesn't matter; there's nothing in canon that contradicts bowcasters being different - there's the fact that Ren just KILLED HIS FATHER.
Luke got hit in the hand in ROTJ when distracted - it's quite believable that Chewbacca could slip a shot in while Ren was distracted. He has obvious problems with emotional control.
Diamondeye wrote:
Quote:
Part of the problem is the use of the term "Mary Sue". People should basically never use this term; it mainly means characters that are a fan-fic author avatar inserted so someone can feel awesome amid their favorite series characters. Series-creater characters are never "Mary Sues".
Are you suggesting that Abrams didn't grow up as a massive fan-boy of Star Wars as a kid? This is officially sanctioned big-budget fan fiction, Mary Sue is completely on the table from the literalist definition.
I don't care if he did or not. If it's officially sanctioned, it's not "Mary Sue".
You know why? Because YOU, and the rest of the fanbase, is not the creator either, and passing whatever arbitrary threshold exists in your mind is pretty much totally irrelevant. This movie is now canon. There are no Mary Sues in canon, ever. Pretty much ALL OF US grew up massive SW fan-boys or fan-girls; just because Abrams got to direct a movie and you're determined to be a grouch doesn't make him wrong.