Müs wrote:
NephyrS wrote:
I'm not sure whether your think this is a good thing or bad thing.
Personally, I hate 16:9 with every bone in my body, so if someone replaced the wonderful 3x 4:3 monitors in the first picture with the abominations in the second picture, I'd be ready to kill them.
Why? More screen real estate is a good thing.
Too much horizontal, not enough vertical.
Personally, I'm using 2x 16:10 24" monitors and one 4:3 2", all Dell Ultrasharps- they've all got 1200px vertical resolution, and then 1900, 1900 and 1600 horizontal respectively. The extra vertical real-estate is huge for me- they're all the perfect size for a full 11" vertical document to fit, and with the 2 24" monitors I can tile 4 pages side-by-side to work.
You'll always get more screen real-estate at 16:10 than 16:9, and technically, always more with 4:3 than 16:9, assuming you have enough monitors.