The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:07 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
I held off on watching this on DVD until I could enjoy it in my new house (surround sound cranked up for the first time in 3 years).

I really enjoyed this movie. I am glad they did a good job with this movie, Terminator 3, also known as Terminator Salvation. Terminator 3, the third Terminator movie, which is also known as Terminator Salvation, lived up to my expectations.

I hope that when they make Terminator 4, the fourth Terminator movie, the one after Terminator Salvation, that it is made just as well as this one.

My only beef with the movie is:
Spoiler:
They should have had a scene at the end of the movie showing Kyle, John, and others giving Marcus a proper and respectful military burial. And they should have shown a gravestone with his name on it, maybe with the word "Friend" on it or something. This would have been a very, very significant scene. Why? Because Kyle tells Marcus much earlier in the movie, "You know what the difference between us and the machines are? We bury our dead. Nobody will bury you." Tsk tsk tsk. Such wasted writing potential and would have been the ultimate cherry on top of this good movie.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:59 am 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
It was the fourth Terminator movie, unless you are in denial about Terminator: Geezer against Skynet.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
T3 doesn't exist.

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
Nevandal wrote:
T3 doesn't exist.

Of course it does. It's on a shelf right next to Highlander 2 and Godfather 3.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
Don't forget all "The Crow" sequels, and MST3K.

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:43 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Nevandal wrote:
and MST3K.


YOU DIE! YOU GO TO HELL AND YOU DIE!!!

Heretic.

/squinty eyes

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
What does LTTP mean? Late to the party?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:43 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Ladas wrote:
What does LTTP mean? Late to the party?


Jes.

I had to google it myself. Twas a new one for me.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:11 pm
Posts: 841
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Was the "third" Terminator bad or something? Was that the one with the girl terminator?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:24 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
Elessar wrote:
Was the "third" Terminator bad or something? Was that the one with the girl terminator?

Yeah. I seem to be alone around here in actually liking that movie. A hot lesbian terminatrix, more explosions than even Cameron can dream up, and a nice closing of the time-paradox loop. What more can you ask for?

Oh, and I'm even more LTTP on this one, now that I know what that means.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
This fantasy Terminator 3 would suck, if it existed, because it would piss all over James Cameron's movies. And then it would take a dump on his movies. And after it finished, it would then spit on them.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
T3 wasn't that bad. It continued the timeline just fine, and, as mentioned, closed the time loop very satisfactorily. T: Salvation didn't re-open it, so I still consider the franchise complete.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:58 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
I don't get the beef with T3 either. "It crapped on James Cameron" is an insufficient explanation.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:54 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Ugh. I agree with Señor Ogre here. I couldn't stand Terminator 3. It was poorly assembled (looking and feeling more more like a direct-to-video sequel than a legitimate Terminator movie), with a hideous, overly jokey script and phoned-in performances.

And WTF is up with the MST3k hate?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:38 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
FarSky wrote:
Ugh. I agree with Señor Ogre here. I couldn't stand Terminator 3. It was poorly assembled (looking and feeling more more like a direct-to-video sequel than a legitimate Terminator movie), with a hideous, overly jokey script and phoned-in performances.

And WTF is up with the MST3k hate?

Might be a fundamental difference of personalities. I've never been able to take more than about 10 minutes of MST3K, 2K, etc., but I like the not-Numbuk T3.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 pm 
Offline
I am here, click me!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:00 pm
Posts: 3676
I'll admit that T3 wasn't as good as the others, but it was still action packed. And, best of all, Arnold was still the Terminator. If I had one real complaint about Salvation, it would be that Arnold wasn't the star.

_________________
Los Angeles Kings 2014 Stanley Cup Champions

"I love this **** team right here."
-Jonathan Quick


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
Actual Terminator 3 was just fine. Salvation was WAY underrated, tho.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
MST3K is awesome. If you've never gotten it, watch it early in the morning.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
In order to understand why I hate T3, you have to understand why I think Cameron's first two movies are very good.

1. James Cameron's first Terminator movies were perfect dichotomies of each other. Two people sent back in time to do the same missions, one big and scary looking, the other slim. Roles reversed in both movies.

2. "The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make." That was the driving force behind T2, even moreso if you watch the Director's Cut. Having T2 end with the possibility that Judgment Day could actually be avoided, and leaving it up to the viewer to decide, was a specific decision made by Cameron. So much so that he changed the original ending of T2 which showed Judgment Day did indeed not happen. It makes a statement about humanity and that we are control of our own lives and destinies. I like movies with statements, even if veiled.

3. The T-800 in T2 made a rather large sacrifice. He learned and understood the importance of destroying Skynet and the importance of humanity so much so that he went against his hard-wired programming (he disobeyed direct orders from John).


T3 pisses all over each of those things. It destroys the dichotomy of the first two movies by re-hashing (poorly, I might add) the plot from the second movie. It destroys Cameron's message about "no fate" by laying it all flat-out that Judgment Day does indeed happen... and, inso-doing, also completely nullifies the importance of the T-800's sacrifice in T2.

I don't mind movies like Terminator: Salvation because if T-3 never existed, you could (if you believed Judgement Day doesn't happen, since Cameron gave you that choice) view it as a "What If?" or an alternate future. In fact, that is exactly what I was hoping T3 was going to be when I first heard it was announced.

I know some people need things spelled out for them. They don't like things left up to themselves. They want it all clear, black and white. But sometimes having things spelled-out too clearly ruins some of the point of certain stories. This was very much the case with T3. Another perfect example is the difference between the original and Director's cut of Donnie Darko.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:49 am 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Numbuk wrote:
In order to understand why I hate T3, you have to understand why I think Cameron's first two movies are very good.

1. James Cameron's first Terminator movies were perfect dichotomies of each other. Two people sent back in time to do the same missions, one big and scary looking, the other slim. Roles reversed in both movies.

2. "The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make." That was the driving force behind T2, even moreso if you watch the Director's Cut. Having T2 end with the possibility that Judgment Day could actually be avoided, and leaving it up to the viewer to decide, was a specific decision made by Cameron. So much so that he changed the original ending of T2 which showed Judgment Day did indeed not happen. It makes a statement about humanity and that we are control of our own lives and destinies. I like movies with statements, even if veiled.

3. The T-800 in T2 made a rather large sacrifice. He learned and understood the importance of destroying Skynet and the importance of humanity so much so that he went against his hard-wired programming (he disobeyed direct orders from John).


T3 pisses all over each of those things. It destroys the dichotomy of the first two movies by re-hashing (poorly, I might add) the plot from the second movie. It destroys Cameron's message about "no fate" by laying it all flat-out that Judgment Day does indeed happen... and, inso-doing, also completely nullifies the importance of the T-800's sacrifice in T2.

I don't mind movies like Terminator: Salvation because if T-3 never existed, you could (if you believed Judgement Day doesn't happen, since Cameron gave you that choice) view it as a "What If?" or an alternate future. In fact, that is exactly what I was hoping T3 was going to be when I first heard it was announced.

I know some people need things spelled out for them. They don't like things left up to themselves. They want it all clear, black and white. But sometimes having things spelled-out too clearly ruins some of the point of certain stories. This was very much the case with T3. Another perfect example is the difference between the original and Director's cut of Donnie Darko.


Actually, without a parallel universe theory of time travel, it is impossible for Judgement Day to not happen. Since that is unlikely the theory of time travel used, your entire conclusions about the end of T2 would be unfounded.

Hence, bullet point 2) is irrelevant.

I don't remember point 3).

I find 1) to be of incredibly low concern, personally, but I guess I see how somebody could care.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
DFK! wrote:
I don't remember point 3).

I believe in point 3, Numbuk is refering to when the Terminator elected to be lowered into the molten steel to destroy the only remaining chips that would lead to the development of Skynet. Which, as such, I dispute this Terminator made a large sacrifice and ignored orders. His original orders were to protect the young Conner, and the only means to insure that order was carried out was to follow the logical progression that if destroying the remains from the first movie was a goal in that cause, so would be destroying the rest.

I also think that Numbuk is mistaken in his claim that Cameron left open the possibility that Judgement Day was avoidable. T1 established the date of Judgement Day, which was unchanged in T2, despite the fact that the technological advances that allowed for Judgement Day to occur on that date were directly the result of the events in T1.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Yeah, T2 pretty solidly confirmed that the franchise wasn't using an parallel worlds time travel model, so it didn't leave anything open.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:53 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
Numbuk wrote:
In order to understand why I hate T3, you have to understand why I think Cameron's first two movies are very good.

1. James Cameron's first Terminator movies were perfect dichotomies of each other. Two people sent back in time to do the same missions, one big and scary looking, the other slim. Roles reversed in both movies.

2. "The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make." That was the driving force behind T2, even moreso if you watch the Director's Cut. Having T2 end with the possibility that Judgment Day could actually be avoided, and leaving it up to the viewer to decide, was a specific decision made by Cameron. So much so that he changed the original ending of T2 which showed Judgment Day did indeed not happen. It makes a statement about humanity and that we are control of our own lives and destinies. I like movies with statements, even if veiled.

3. The T-800 in T2 made a rather large sacrifice. He learned and understood the importance of destroying Skynet and the importance of humanity so much so that he went against his hard-wired programming (he disobeyed direct orders from John).


T3 pisses all over each of those things. It destroys the dichotomy of the first two movies by re-hashing (poorly, I might add) the plot from the second movie. It destroys Cameron's message about "no fate" by laying it all flat-out that Judgment Day does indeed happen... and, inso-doing, also completely nullifies the importance of the T-800's sacrifice in T2.

I don't mind movies like Terminator: Salvation because if T-3 never existed, you could (if you believed Judgement Day doesn't happen, since Cameron gave you that choice) view it as a "What If?" or an alternate future. In fact, that is exactly what I was hoping T3 was going to be when I first heard it was announced.

I know some people need things spelled out for them. They don't like things left up to themselves. They want it all clear, black and white. But sometimes having things spelled-out too clearly ruins some of the point of certain stories. This was very much the case with T3. Another perfect example is the difference between the original and Director's cut of Donnie Darko.


Nice synopsis of how and why you dislike it.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:03 pm 
Offline
I am here, click me!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:00 pm
Posts: 3676
Just remember, Judgment day had to happen because history abhors a paradox. Judgment day not happening would be a paradox and history would purge whatever caused the paradox so that Judgment day would happen.

_________________
Los Angeles Kings 2014 Stanley Cup Champions

"I love this **** team right here."
-Jonathan Quick


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
Paradoxes can be ignored by the viewer just like time travel and killer sentient cyborgs existing (at all) can be ignored.

Now you guys know why I don't like T3. You asked for them. Attempting to argue against my reasons for disliking it is 100% futile. You may as well attempt to convince me to like saurkraut via a worded online debate. And I wish you luck with that.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group