Hopwin wrote:
I like this line of reasoning, basically the ego gave rise to property. Almost as if "I think, therefore I am... and that **** over there is mine." To me this argument makes sense, but what happens when two egos claim the same property?
Law exists, or is created.
The foundation of law is basically dispute resolution alternative to arms. Hence, theoretically in a libertarian or rights-based republic, government exists to protect rights by "mediating" disputes. Which disputes they mediate depend upon what is in their jurisdiction.
Local municipalities -> Individuals
State -> Local municipalities
Federal -> States.
The problem is that they're all trying to 1) "mediate" at the individual level (i.e.: expand their jurisdiction, gaining more authority or "power") and 2) do more than simply "mediate."