The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:29 pm 
Offline
Sensitive Ponytail Guy
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:18 pm
Posts: 2765
Is it just me or is the plot an exercise in self-fulfilling paradox?

Spoiler:
Don't get me wrong. I enjoyed the movie but it seems to me that all of the "bad stuff" that never came to pass because Donnie stayed in bed that night wouldn't have happened if not for the influence of the "time traveler", not to mention the fact that he might not have gotten out of bed at all if not for Frank. I wasn't entirely clear on whether or not his night wanderings were a solidly established everynight occurrence so I'll admit it's possible he'd have escaped his fate with or without intervention but since the events which then transpired were directly and heavily influenced by his new "friend", I can't help but think that the tangent universe was kind of a sham.
Anyone care to shed some light on this from an angle I might've missed?

_________________
Go back to zero, take a pill, and get well ~ Lemmy Kilmister


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:00 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
The events would have transpired anyway, but Frank was sent back to prevent the future from occurring.

I think the only real good to come from Frank going back in time was to expose Patrick Swayze's disturbing side.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:15 pm 
Offline
Sensitive Ponytail Guy
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:18 pm
Posts: 2765
darksiege wrote:
The events would have transpired anyway
Would they have, though? Remember, it was Frank who told Donnie to flood the school and burn down Jim Cunningham's house. Sure, he wasn't exactly stable before Frank showed up, but would things have gotten as bad without that influence?

_________________
Go back to zero, take a pill, and get well ~ Lemmy Kilmister


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:18 pm 
Offline
I am here, click me!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:00 pm
Posts: 3676
I think...the director's cut of the movie basically holds your hand and explains everything, leaving no unanswered questions. I haven't seen that cut of the film, though. I enjoyed the movie, however...but, as is the case with all realistic time traveling movies/stories/whatever, unless everything is laid out and explained, most people will be left seriously wondering WTF happened.

_________________
Los Angeles Kings 2014 Stanley Cup Champions

"I love this **** team right here."
-Jonathan Quick


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
Raltar wrote:
I think...the director's cut of the movie basically holds your hand and explains everything, leaving no unanswered questions. I haven't seen that cut of the film, though. I enjoyed the movie, however...but, as is the case with all realistic time traveling movies/stories/whatever, unless everything is laid out and explained, most people will be left seriously wondering WTF happened.


Yeah, this was kind of the problem with the directors cut of that film. I saw the original in the theater and went for coffee afterwards with some friends. We all sat around discussing what the film was actually about for quite awhile. Unfortunately, a lot of the mystery was removed when they recut it, and I personally think it lost a little of the magic that made it so great in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:47 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
My contribution to this thread: Don't ever watch S. Darko. It's terrible.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
Darkroland wrote:
Raltar wrote:
I think...the director's cut of the movie basically holds your hand and explains everything, leaving no unanswered questions. I haven't seen that cut of the film, though. I enjoyed the movie, however...but, as is the case with all realistic time traveling movies/stories/whatever, unless everything is laid out and explained, most people will be left seriously wondering WTF happened.


Yeah, this was kind of the problem with the directors cut of that film. I saw the original in the theater and went for coffee afterwards with some friends. We all sat around discussing what the film was actually about for quite awhile. Unfortunately, a lot of the mystery was removed when they recut it, and I personally think it lost a little of the magic that made it so great in the first place.



Very true. Nobody should ever, ever watch the Director's Cut of this movie for their first viewing. The movie worked much better when the plot was a lot more mysterious and made you really think and interpret it in your own way.

That said, I liked Donnie Darko a HELL of a lot more than Butterfly Effect.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:29 pm 
Offline
I am here, click me!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:00 pm
Posts: 3676
Lenas wrote:
My contribution to this thread: Don't ever watch S. Darko. It's terrible.


I second this. What a horrible disappointment that movie was...good lord.

_________________
Los Angeles Kings 2014 Stanley Cup Champions

"I love this **** team right here."
-Jonathan Quick


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Raltar wrote:
Lenas wrote:
My contribution to this thread: Don't ever watch S. Darko. It's terrible.


I second this. What a horrible disappointment that movie was...good lord.

Oh, God yes.

Best part of watching this movie? My brother watching the guy drive on-screen in the IROC, and dismissively saying, "Child rapist."

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:21 pm 
Offline
Sensitive Ponytail Guy
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:18 pm
Posts: 2765
Numbuk wrote:
Darkroland wrote:
Raltar wrote:
I think...the director's cut of the movie basically holds your hand and explains everything, leaving no unanswered questions.
Yeah, this was kind of the problem with the directors cut of that film.
Very true. Nobody should ever, ever watch the Director's Cut of this movie for their first viewing.
Oh great, now y'all tell me :P

I was torn, actually. Didn't know whether to get the original cut or the director's cut, and had no way of knowing what the difference would be. Looks like I kinda blew it. Oh well, my bad.

_________________
Go back to zero, take a pill, and get well ~ Lemmy Kilmister


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
It was a **** up movie. Not Naked Lunch **** up, but **** up none the less.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
Shelgeyr wrote:
I was torn, actually. Didn't know whether to get the original cut or the director's cut, and had no way of knowing what the difference would be. Looks like I kinda blew it. Oh well, my bad.


Well, just shooting from the hip, you would generally think that a directors cut was superior (as it was with the butterfly effect. I only saw the directors cut and commented at one point how it was a pretty good movie. My friends couldn't believe it. Then I understood when I saw the original crap theatrical cut.)

Basically, the lesson to take away is this. Don't ever buy anything without asking us first. :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:43 pm 
Offline
Sensitive Ponytail Guy
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:18 pm
Posts: 2765
Darkroland wrote:
Shelgeyr wrote:
I was torn, actually. Didn't know whether to get the original cut or the director's cut, and had no way of knowing what the difference would be. Looks like I kinda blew it. Oh well, my bad.
Well, just shooting from the hip, you would generally think that a directors cut was superior (as it was with the butterfly effect. I only saw the directors cut and commented at one point how it was a pretty good movie. My friends couldn't believe it. Then I understood when I saw the original crap theatrical cut.)
Thanks for the tip, I might have to rent the director's cut sometime. Having seen the "original crap theatrical cut" and not being terribly impressed by it and all.
Darkroland wrote:
Basically, the lesson to take away is this. Don't ever buy anything without asking us first. :)
Oh gosh no. I didn't buy it. That would be silly ;)

_________________
Go back to zero, take a pill, and get well ~ Lemmy Kilmister


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
Shelgeyr wrote:
Darkroland wrote:
Basically, the lesson to take away is this. Don't ever buy anything without asking us first. :)
Oh gosh no. I didn't buy it. That would be silly ;)


Whew, thank goodness you dodged that bullet! ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:50 pm 
Offline
Best Chance You've Got
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 74
Location: Wasteland
Yeah, people shouldn't make original movies. It should have been Donnie Darko Meets The X-Men or some remake of a remake or G.I. Donnie Darko. I think ppl are too stupid to watch movies that don't have a cereal named after them or something.

_________________
Sometimes it's the tiger or the tiger
Image
"But Amdee, darling, you're a homicidal maniac..."-Mickell


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:18 pm 
Offline
Bitterness, Love & Violence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:47 pm
Posts: 459
Location: Valhalla
Donnie Darkio's?

_________________
"I've got twenty ways to tell you shut the f*ck up / nineteen of them are twenty-four bars long / the other one goes: SHUT THE F*CK UP" - Aesop Rock
"There is no God higher than truth." -- Gandhi
Formerly: Tulamian


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:16 pm 
Offline
Best Chance You've Got
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 74
Location: Wasteland
Loki wrote:
Donnie Darkio's?

Yeah! And even though they supposedly create great chocolate milk, they disappear when you look at them, ala Schrödinger's cat. ; )


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 121 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group