The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Dash wrote:
I was thinking of this example:

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/stor ... 348&page=1

Quote:
Sen. Barack Obama's chief strategist conceded that the Democratic presidential candidate was referring to his race when he said Republicans were trying to scare voters by suggesting Obama "doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills."


He definitely played it like the GOP was out to get him because he was black. This is him personally now. The media at large, well there are countless examples.


I agree that's a kind of round-about identity politics ("I'm not playing the race card; the white guys are!") However, I think there is legitimacy in acknowledging that Obama really didn't fit the traditional image of US Presidents, and that some Republicans were trying to capitalize on that in their campaign tactics. More importantly, though, I think the overall tone and message is what we have to consider. Sure, there are examples of Obama playing to people's sense of tribal identity, but overall, his message was very much about getting past those distinctions. He really didn't talk about race, religion, etc. in tones of grievance very often. Palin, on the other hand, seems to do so in pretty much every speech or interview she's given on the national stage. Hence my characterization of her as more like Sharpton than Obama.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Diamondeye wrote:
The healthcare debate is playing heavily on the "Rich vs. Poor" dichotomy which is definitely identity politics.


Fair point. I honestly haven't figured out how I think class fits into the identity politics concept - in some ways it's a different kind of cleavage with its own dynamics and history, but in other ways it's impossible to separate completely from the rural/urban, white/black, religious/secular stuff.

Either way, though, you're right that class resentments are getting a lot of play from Obama and the Left in the healthcare debate, and I find it pretty distasteful too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:28 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
RangerDave wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Think of your own post about healthcare, where you're essentially citing the "us v. them" nature of the healthcare debate. That's straight from the horse's mouth vis. "Republicans have no ideas and no coherent plan." Not only is that a blatant falsehood, it is the exact definition you're using above being spoken by the PRESIDENT OF OUR COUNTRY every day.


That's partisan politics, not identity politics. For it to be identity politics, it has to be about a person's sense of tribal identity within the broad racial and cultural cleavages (boobies!) in the electorate. In short, black vs. white, men vs. women, religious vs. secular, rural vs. urban, populist vs. elitist, etc., not Republican vs. Democrat.


Moving goalposts.

You wanted to define the term, so you did. This was not in your original definition.

Furthermore, take these as further representations: "the big insurance companies are against this." "The luxury insurance plans are bad." "This is 'for the people's benefit.'" Etc, etc. All of those, in their original context, are identity statements, using your definition.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Khross wrote:
RangerDave:

Barack Obama wrote:
Yes We Can.


I don't get it. The "we" in that is pretty hugely inclusive.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
DFK! wrote:
Moving goalposts.

You wanted to define the term, so you did. This was not in your original definition.

Furthermore, take these as further representations: "the big insurance companies are against this." "The luxury insurance plans are bad." "This is 'for the people's benefit.'" Etc, etc. All of those, in their original context, are identity statements, using your definition.


Aye, I suppose I was overinclusive in my initial attempt at a definition. I did include "class" initially, but in a subsequent post I clarified that I'm not really sure how class identification fits the model, since class involves more than simple income differences. Even if class should be in there in some form, though, it's important to keep in mind that Obama's use of class resentments doesn't involve putting himself out there as a representative of the class he's appealing to. He doesn't say, "Those rich guys are keeping us poor guys down!" Palin, on the other hand, does position herself as a stand-in for the broader identity group she's appealing to.

I don't know exactly how it all shakes out, but it seems pretty obvious to me that there are meaningful differences between Obama's political appeal and Palin's political appeal, and I think those differences have a lot to do with the kind of identity politics and resentments that I'm talking about here. Do you guys really perceive no difference between the two other than Obama's a Dem and she's a Rep?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:45 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
RangerDave wrote:
Do you guys really perceive no difference between the two other than Obama's a Dem and she's a Rep?



He's better at it.

By which I mean, she's uncouth, brash, or whatever you want to call it. He's more subtle, but not so subtle that his base doesn't get it.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:47 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
I'm still not buying that Palin is appealing to an identity group except insofar as A) she's been placed in that identity group by others and has no choice and B) her political ideas are those that the demographics in question are likely to appeal to those demographics anyhow.

In any case, putting her (or Obama) in the same class of identity politics as Sharpton or Jackson is absurd.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
DFK! wrote:
He's better at it.

By which I mean, she's uncouth, brash, or whatever you want to call it. He's more subtle, but not so subtle that his base doesn't get it.


So what group identity and resentments do you think he's appealing to?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:45 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
RangerDave wrote:
DFK! wrote:
He's better at it.

By which I mean, she's uncouth, brash, or whatever you want to call it. He's more subtle, but not so subtle that his base doesn't get it.


So what group identity and resentments do you think he's appealing to?


Black v. white.
"Working class" v. "management."
Poor v. "not poor."
"Big business" (specifically insurance) v. "the little guy."

There are others, but those are the only ones I think I could support without too much difficulty in research.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 889
DFK! wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
DFK! wrote:
He's better at it.

By which I mean, she's uncouth, brash, or whatever you want to call it. He's more subtle, but not so subtle that his base doesn't get it.


So what group identity and resentments do you think he's appealing to?


Black v. white.
"Working class" v. "management."
Poor v. "not poor."
"Big business" (specifically insurance) v. "the little guy."

There are others, but those are the only ones I think I could support without too much difficulty in research.


Wall St vs Main St


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
RangerDave wrote:
Either way, though, you're right that class resentments are getting a lot of play from Obama and the Left in the healthcare debate, and I find it pretty distasteful too.

Just about every one of Obama's initiatives involves class "warfare", and it he makes mention of it in most of his speeches.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:46 am 
Offline
Simple Bot Herder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 333
DFK! wrote:
Hey Adrak:

Go **** yourself.

It isn't my fault you cannot post a logical post, or make logical connections.

"Oh look, here's an announcement some big pol is speaking at an event. She's a idiotic cow whore ****."

Yeah, that makes sense. And I'm the retard?

I ask a genuine question and get idiotic namecalling in response. Good to see where this **** forum is going.


I figured playing the retard card would be acceptable in this thread considering this is behavior she has recently defended. I suppose my sarcasm was lost on you in my post.

I don't plan to be a permanent pain in the *** in this forum, although I would like to be able to think I can express myself once in a while and not be immediately banned.

I am not really one to debate a topic for 6 pages, figure if you can't validate what you are trying to say in a few posts it is probably not going to happen.

Flames happen in Hell, I do think recent moderation was called for though.

_________________
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one." Charles Mackay


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group