The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:35 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:02 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Taskiss wrote:
Rynar wrote:
Xequecal:

Are you aware that half of the money that the IRS takes in is spent on collecting taxes?

The entire 2007 IRS budget was 10.7 billion.
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,, ... 82,00.html

The IRS collected $2.4 Trillion in FY 2007
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/07dbreturnfiled.pdf

The GDP in 2007 was $14.56 trillion (estimated, I've seen where the CIA listed it at $13.84 trillion on Google also)
https://www.cia.gov/library/publication ... os/us.html

Just wow, Rynar.


I appologize. Taskiss is correct. I completely misstated myself, and in the process bungled the efficiency data anyway. It has been awhile since I researched this, and apparently I remebered what I wanted to, instead of what actually was.

The data point I was looking for was the cost of compliance with the tax code, which is estimated conservatively at $500 billion. Which is a quarter to a fifth of revenues collected, not the fifty percent I had indicated prior.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Rynar wrote:
The data point I was looking for was the cost of compliance with the tax code, which is estimated conservatively at $500 billion. Which is a quarter to a fifth of revenues collected, not the fifty percent I had indicated prior.


http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/topic/96.html
Quote:
Compliance Costs & Tax Complexity

The full cost a tax system is more than the amount of tax paid. It also includes the cost of tax planning and paperwork. Economists call these "tax compliance" costs, and the IRS estimates Americans spend 6.6 billion hours per year filling out tax forms—including 1.6 billion hours on the 1040 form alone. In 2002 Americans spent roughly $194 billion dollars on tax compliance. That amounts to 20 cents of compliance cost for every dollar collected by the tax system.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24112908/
Quote:
If it's any consolation to the individual still trying to get receipts in order a day before Tuesday's filing deadline, businesses have it far worse. The National Taxpayers Union, in its annual look at the burdens of taxpaying, said the corporate cost of compliance is about $170 billion. General Electric in 2006 filed returns equivalent to 24,000 printed pages.


An Open Letter to the President, the Congress, and the American people by advocates of the FairTax Plan. (linked from http://www.whitehouse.gov)
Quote:
The current U.S. income tax code is widely regarded by just about everyone as unfair, complex, wasteful, confusing, and costly. Businesses and other organizations spend more than six billion hours each year complying with the federal tax code. Estimated compliance costs conservatively top $225 billion annually – costs that are ultimately embedded in retail prices paid by consumers.


The numbers are not exact, and I'm a bit skeptical of putting out a cost estimate that includes how many hours individuals spend filling out their tax forms as a cost, but there you have it.

Personally, it seems the FairTax Plan provides many benefits and I'd like more national discussion concerning that and other tax reform opportunities.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Last edited by Taskiss on Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:32 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
I am holding the FairTax hard copy in my hand. It reads $500 billion. I suppose your millage may vary.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Rynar wrote:
I am holding the FairTax hard copy in my hand. It reads $500 billion. I suppose your millage may vary.


Here's the one on their site:
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/Open_Letter.pdf

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:49 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
I saw that, and am not disputing it, but as I said, I'm litterally holding a hard copy in my hands, and it says $500 billion.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Rynar wrote:
I saw that, and am not disputing it, but as I said, I'm litterally holding a hard copy in my hands, and it says $500 billion.

I'm just going to the source, Rynar. I thought it interesting that the document didn't have a date on it, but be that as it may, both the PDF on the whitehouse site and the PDF on the fairtax site are in agreement.

I'm just a numbers freak. If there is a clam that "$X amount" or "X number of folks" or "X degrees of warming" is claimed, my eyes glaze over and I find myself possessed by some anal retentive spirit (probably a bookkeeper who died 'cause he couldn't quit trying to resolve a 2 cent discrepancy in his books) that forces me to google the claim.

Please contribute to my therapy! It'll cost MUCH less than the IRS budget, I assure you. ;) Probably only half as much.

www.savetaskissfromhimself.org

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:27 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
ALOL.

There are worse things than a love of and a head for numbers.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:13 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Rynar wrote:
I saw that, and am not disputing it, but as I said, I'm litterally holding a hard copy in my hands, and it says $500 billion.


Whoever wrote that is absolutely smoking crack. That's 2/3 of the defense budget!

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:41 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Diamondeye wrote:
Rynar wrote:
I saw that, and am not disputing it, but as I said, I'm litterally holding a hard copy in my hands, and it says $500 billion.


Whoever wrote that is absolutely smoking crack. That's 2/3 of the defense budget!


That is the estimated cost of compliance with the US tax code presented in Rep. John Linder's FairTax book.

In fairness, estimates tend to range between $170-$700 billion. Taskiss has presented other numbers, possibly more credible.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:56 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Lex Luthor wrote:
Flipping a burger turns it from uncooked meat to cooked meat, which is more valuable (when it's fresh).

Acting in a play provides entertainment, which is worth money.

Labor and the products of labor are usually traded with currency. You can also trade a chair for a table. Both are products of labor. Both are forms of wealth.

Labor is "stored" in wealth.

This is all basic economics, Rynar.


At least be more fun. Lex, if everything you've told us is true, and you devoutly believe it,then at least be true to yourself. Engage yourself in better conversation. Embrace the best part of yourself.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:57 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Labor has value; it only becomes wealth with a fiat currency.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Rynar wrote:
Embrace the best part of yourself.
I've heard that's bad for your eyesight and grows hair in embarrassing places.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:12 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
That is the best part of you?

Well, yes, you, probably.

Not that I ever plan to try Taskiss Tenderloin, you don't know where its been.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Micheal wrote:
That is the best part of you?

Well, yes, you, probably.

Not that I ever plan to try Taskiss Tenderloin, you don't know where its been.

No, the best part of Lex. The best part of me is just behind and a little above the crook of my left elbow.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Elmarnieh wrote:
Really, all of them?

Andrew Carnegie donated vast sums of his wealth while alive to museums, found universities, and peaceful enterprises.

Sure. But you kind of have to weigh that against things like the Johnstown Flood. Not that Carnegie, Frick, Mellon, etc. were deliberately responsible for it, per se, but it was certainly the negligence of their private club that caused the disaster.

At least to hear McCullough tell it, it was Carnegie's guilt over the Johnstown disaster that would spark much of his philanthropic work later in life. That may be to his credit; however, neither Carnegie nor any of his associates in the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club ever accepted any responsibility for the disaster. They took a "vow of public silence", so to speak, about the whole affair, and fought tooth and nail against the various lawsuits alleging (quite correctly) that the club's slip-shod engineering and maintenance of the South Fork Damn and its irresponsible overfilling (solely for the sake of creating nicer fishing...) were directly responsible for the flood.

I don't think there any easy answers when it comes to men like Carnegie. I don't think the rose-colored "Great Philanthropist" POV is any more realistic than the "evil robber-baron" POV. The uncomfortable reality is that both are true, to an extent. Most of these men were both.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:33 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Stathol wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
Really, all of them?

Andrew Carnegie donated vast sums of his wealth while alive to museums, found universities, and peaceful enterprises.

Sure. But you kind of have to weigh that against things like the Johnstown Flood. Not that Carnegie, Frick, Mellon, etc. were deliberately responsible for it, per se, but it was certainly the negligence of their private club that caused the disaster.

At least to hear McCullough tell it, it was Carnegie's guilt over the Johnstown disaster that would spark much of his philanthropic work later in life. That may be to his credit; however, neither Carnegie nor any of his associates in the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club ever accepted any responsibility for the disaster. They took a "vow of public silence", so to speak, about the whole affair, and fought tooth and nail against the various lawsuits alleging (quite correctly) that the club's slip-shod engineering and maintenance of the South Fork Damn and its irresponsible overfilling (solely for the sake of creating nicer fishing...) were directly responsible for the flood.

I don't think there any easy answers when it comes to men like Carnegie. I don't think the rose-colored "Great Philanthropist" POV is any more realistic than the "evil robber-baron" POV. The uncomfortable reality is that both are true, to an extent. Most of these men were both.


How was that book?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:12 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
It's been a few years since I've read it, but pretty good, as I recall. He's even-handed about it, and I think he did a good job of exploring all the terrain.

It's really hard to imagine, from a present-day point of view, that someone could just privately dam a public waterway like that without any kind of oversight, much less regulation. And equally amazing that despite years of concerns about the dam's safety, people were largely content to just trust that the club knew what it was doing and wouldn't actually recklessly endanger them. A lot changed in American culture and law after Johnstown.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Stathol wrote:
It's really hard to imagine, from a present-day point of view, that someone could just privately dam a public waterway like that without any kind of oversight, much less regulation.

It wasn't privately built, though it was sold to a private group after the fact. From your source (emphasis mine):

Quote:
High above the city, near the small town of South Fork, the South Fork Dam was originally built between 1838 and 1853 by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as part of a canal system to be used as a reservoir for a canal basin in Johnstown.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 206 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group