The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:54 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:50 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Monte wrote:
/cop holds up bag of cheetos

What does the alleged stoner do?


drools?

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:38 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
That field sobriety test would be unfair to Chester Cheetah... Remember, Neil Pert **** rocks!

[youtube]7_HtMD-jWS8[/youtube]

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:07 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Talya wrote:
This will create an awesome state-vs.-fed power showdown. Go California!


Nah, Obama's admionistration wants to be out of the way of this. I predict no interference from the Federal Government.

That said, with the ease with which growing for personal use is done, I feel the amount yielded by taxation will be less than anticipated.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:43 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
This passed the CA Assembly of Public Safety vote, by the way. 4-3. Looking like it'll end up on the ballots next November.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:36 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
Nope, has to make it out of the health committee by Friday. That just isn't going to happen. Nice try, but it will die in committee.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:44 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
/necro

Spoke too soon, Mike.

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/201 ... ia-ballot/
Quote:
It’s official. Tax Cannabis 2010, the most far-reaching state effort ever, which would legalize the consumption of cannabis for all adults over 21 — and would finally take the industry that serves those consumers out of a legal gray area — will qualify for the November mid-term ballot later today.

The Tax Cannabis campaign gathered just under 700,000 signatures, well over the 434,000 needed to qualify for the California ballot.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:14 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
I'm really torn on this. On one hand I work for the Department that monitors the facilities that help people who have drug abuse problems and whether some of you believe it or not, we have huge numbers of people for whom smoking pot is a huge problem in their lives, and i'm not talking about it being illegal, I'm talking about it consuming their lives like other drug addictions.

On the other hand, I know a lot of people who use marijuana regularly and maintain a pretty normal lifestyle, no run ins with the law, no real problem, except the nerves at point of purchase. Even that has diminished greatly over the years.

Alcohol is legal and we have lots of people going through lots of trouble because of that drug, and we learned from prohibition that, well prohibition does not work.

By the way, remember me talking about spot bills? AB 2254 was overwritten with the language from AB 139 so now the bill to watch is AB 2254, still going through the process.

In the meantime, the petition to put the Tax Cannabis 2010 Proposition on the ballot is a separate entity in and of itself. Same goals and at this point in time it looks likely to pass. I imagine the Assembly will sit on 2254 until November and see what happens with the proposition so the administration doesn't have to put its back against the wall and veto one of the more popular bills in decades, just to show they are tough on drugs.

But, you never know. Budget being as it is, Arnie may bite the bullet, sign it and say its the only way to keep California's finances from sliding into the ocean and the Chinese from foreclosing on Hollywood..

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:46 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Michael, addictive personalities will find something to be addicted to. If it stimulates pleasure center, theyw ill gravitate to it. You should want pot to be more available so people pick this rather than meth or WoW.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:47 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Legalization might save the Californian economy for a few years, Micheal. To my mind, that has to be the largest, and quite frankly, the overwhelming concern right now for any Californian, despite any potential drawbacks.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:17 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Elmarnieh wrote:
Michael, addictive personalities will find something to be addicted to. If it stimulates pleasure center, theyw ill gravitate to it. You should want pot to be more available so people pick this rather than meth or WoW.


People don't cause auto accidents while playing WoW.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:44 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Ha ha ha. You don't know my friends and their laptops.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
Rynar - For me that would be a good thing, looking at the long road, for a lot of people that would be a good thing.

However,it is just going to build up more debt that will never be paid as the legislators refuse to heed the wake up call and start spending all the money the weed brings in. We will still have multi-billion dollar deficits every year until we can issue tags for legislators that spend too much money.

Elm - addictive personalities will find something - that is something like habitual liars will continue to lie, thieves will continue to steal, yadda yadda yadda. Where do we draw the line? Why don't we legalize all this junk, refuse treatment for everything, and make everyone totally accountable for all the **** in their lives no matter what direction it comes from? Bad stuff happens all the time, walking away from people in need is tough, especially when you know they can be helped. DE might not know your friends Elmo, but he'll make sure they are arrested for reckless driving, if they survived, and any other charges that might accumulate from their illegal behavior.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:51 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Sure but laws against driving while under influence (including pot) already exist. So laws that protect the rights of others are in place. Smoking pot by itself causes no harm to others.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:12 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
except maybe the food industry... have you seen the way someone attacks food when they are stoned >.< It's not pretty...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:33 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Micheal wrote:
Rynar - For me that would be a good thing, looking at the long road, for a lot of people that would be a good thing.

However,it is just going to build up more debt that will never be paid as the legislators refuse to heed the wake up call and start spending all the money the weed brings in. We will still have multi-billion dollar deficits every year until we can issue tags for legislators that spend too much money.


I agree wholeheartedly. I would just prefer the suffering be mediated by gradual correction, as opposed to what can otherwise be expected. I will say, however, I'm glad to have read your writing, rather than have written it myself.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:13 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Elmarnieh wrote:
Ha ha ha. You don't know my friends and their laptops.

:shock:

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:33 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Necro because Hellfire has been stuck on a single topic for a few days.

Arnie signs bill decriminalizing marijuana in CA. No longer do you have to see a judge, now you just pay a $100 fine and continue your day.

The California Governor, Schwarzenegger, who opposes Proposition 19, this morning signed a landmark bill in the state of California which decriminalizes the possession of marijuana. For those wondering, this does not make marijuana possession legal, but it no longer will be a misdemeanor offense. Instead of the mandatory fine of $100 as well as the mandatory appearance in front of a judge, the outcome of being caught with marijuana will now simply be a $100 fine. The new law will be in effect on January 1st and include anyone caught with up to an ounce of marijuana. Basically the possession of the drug is seen no different by California now than speeding is.

Schwarzenegger signed the bill because it will save the state a ton of money since there will no longer need to be a judge and attorneys appointed to each and every one of the misdemeanor offenses involving marijuana possession. Last year alone there were 60,000 Californians caught with the drug, and in the last decade approximately 500,000 offenders.

Schwarzenegger however remains against November’s Proposition 19 (known as Prop 19) vote to legalize the drug.


Speeding tickets are $250+ minimum in my experience, and no one gives half a **** about those.

This is likely to be useless, however, because every poll I've seen has Prop 19 ahead. If it doesn't pass for some reason, though, this would still be suitable. At least for another year.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:57 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
That's really a bizarre way to describe it, unless California has a really bizarrely constructed legal code in the first place. In Ohio, it's already a maximum $100 fine with no possible jail for simple posession. It's still a misdemeanor; specifically a minor misdemeanor (the lowest form.)

I don't see how it can still be illegal and you have to pay a fine but they can claim its "decriminalized" and "not a misdemeanor". All they did was lower the severity of it to rock bottom.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:24 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Aren't summary offenses lowers than misdemeanors in Ohio?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:57 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Diamondeye wrote:
I don't see how it can still be illegal and you have to pay a fine but they can claim its "decriminalized" and "not a misdemeanor". All they did was lower the severity of it to rock bottom.


It's not really bizarre.. CA differentiates infractions, misdemeanors and felonies. Infraction means no court, no jail time. Misdemeanor can be penalties up to 1 year of jail time iirc.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
DE,

My understanding is that if you are "convicted" of a misdemeaner, then you cannot say "no" on to a question that asks if you've ever been conficted of a crime.

If you are "convicted" of a speeding violation, you can answer no.

So there's levels of "crime" below misdemeanor.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:28 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
DE,

My understanding is that if you are "convicted" of a misdemeaner, then you cannot say "no" on to a question that asks if you've ever been conficted of a crime.

If you are "convicted" of a speeding violation, you can answer no.

So there's levels of "crime" below misdemeanor.


Not exactly. Traffic offenses are simply not called criminal offenses. Driving with a suspended license is a first-degree misdemeanor, but it is a traffic offense, not a criminal offense. Posession of marijuana is far less serious than driving suspended, but one is criminal and one is traffic.

All felonies are always criminal offenses regardless.

In that sense I suppose you could say that marijuana is "decriminalized" by not being a "criminal" offense any longer that you wouldn't have to admit to on an application, but that would mean it falls into some other category. In Ohio, the only other category is traffic which is obviously not approriate; the legislature would need to create some new category.

Evidently California has "infractions" which is not a concept I ever dealt with. That would, I suppose, be noncriminal if in their code misdemeanors are all criminal. My objection to "decriminalized" is that it sounds like "legalized" but it isn't really legalized, and that subtle distinction is probably lost on many people.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group