The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:03 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

What Are Your Feelings on the Recent 3D Movie Trend?
I love it! I think 3D is a perfectly valid style of film-making. 35%  35%  [ 7 ]
It's okay. 20%  20%  [ 4 ]
I'm indifferent / Can take or leave such movies. 25%  25%  [ 5 ]
It's largely a turn off for me. 20%  20%  [ 4 ]
I hate it! Filming movies in 3D is a stupid trend. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 20
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
For me: option 4. While some movies, statistically speaking, may benefit from it, I largely see it as gimmicky.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:01 pm
Posts: 834
#2 for me.

Thus far, I've found Avatar to be the first movie that I thought it added to the movie instead of being sort of a 'meh' after thought.

I'll be seeing Clash of the Titans, which I think has 3d elements, when it comes out, so perhaps that'll help tilt me to either side.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
Saw How to Train Your Dragon in 3D (IMAX 3D, no less), and I'm not sure it added all that much to it. Some of the effects were cool, but there was too much stuff coming out of the screen at you too early.

Going to see Avatar in 3D this evening, will let you know if I need to change my vote to #1 (I voted #2).

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:44 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
It's a gimmick.

I don't think it's a viable artistic choice, merely the most recent in a history of gimmicks that theaters have attempted in order to remain relevant in the face of the ever-increasing quality of home theaters.

It's fun, when done well, and the current method of 3D is fairly inoffensive (aside from the recent 26% price increase for no reason other than to gouge the consumer.

The bottom line is that 3D is post-production lark...if 3D is actively making your movie better, or worth seeing, you have failed at making a movie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
FarSky wrote:
The bottom line is that 3D is post-production lark...if 3D is actively making your movie better, or worth seeing, you have failed at making a movie.


Well said.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
If/when they ever develop the tech to do 3D without glasses, I can then see it as a mainstream marketable product.

The requirement for glasses make it a gimmick.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:52 pm 
Offline
I am here, click me!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:00 pm
Posts: 3676
I've only seen a single movie recently(like within the past 5 years) that had 3D and that was Beowulf. It didn't seem to add to the experience and it was actually worse because I had to wear the glasses over my normal correctional lenses that I need to not be legally blind. I'm sure I wouldn't mind 3D so much if I didn't have to wear the glasses.

_________________
Los Angeles Kings 2014 Stanley Cup Champions

"I love this **** team right here."
-Jonathan Quick


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Aethien wrote:
Saw How to Train Your Dragon in 3D (IMAX 3D, no less), and I'm not sure it added all that much to it. Some of the effects were cool, but there was too much stuff coming out of the screen at you too early.

Going to see Avatar in 3D this evening, will let you know if I need to change my vote to #1 (I voted #2).

See, I got the exact opposite out of How to Train Your Dragon's 3d use. It was so natural and subtle (instead of going for the gimmicky "gotchas" or "look how cool we can make this!" that lots of 3d movies, particularly earlier ones, fall into) that I essentially forgot I was in a 3d showing, while at the same time adding a lot of depth (no pun intended) to some of the visceral and thrilling scenes, like the various flying with Toothless. That speaks to me of immersion, and is, to me, a hallmark of making quality use of the 3d medium.

Does the notion of wearing glasses annoy me? Yes. Is the concurrent arbitrary price mark-up a nuisance? Yes (though the local theater isn't as bad as Farsky's average by far). Can it be done extremely poorly, or without creativity and an eye for feeling natural? Oh, hell yes. But that's not the fault of the medium, it's a stylistic choice (and a poor one), so I find criticizing the 3d format for such things analogous to criticizing 2d films for shakey-cam.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:15 am 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
I guess I just meant that in that opening scene, there seemed to be a few things thrown in for the gee-whiz effect. But overall, yeah, it wasn't too bad, I guess.

Avatar was pretty cool, I have to say. I think the 3D worked better there, but that just might be because of all the hype I read about it.

Price mark-ups? Tell me about it, and come to LA. I dropped over $100 on movies this weekend between How to Train Your Dragon ($70 for the family at IMAX) and Avatar ($33 for regular 3D for two of us).

And /em shakes fist at the annoying assholes who took our seats tonight. It was reserved seating, so we got there plenty early, chose our seats, and went to get something to eat. 15 minutes of previews, we walk in about 1 minute before it starts, perfect timing ... But there are no empty seats in the row. So, I have to start counting and disturbing people. Turns out two people were in our seats, so I had to kick them out. **** dumb ****, it's reserved seating, go sit where you're supposed to. I had the timing down perfectly and expected to find two empty seats.

Maybe that should be another poll - reserved seats for movies? :D

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:34 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
I think 3D is the is the biggest farce in artistic production since making a picture move.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:50 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Corolinth wrote:
I think 3D is the is the biggest farce in artistic production since making a picture move.

I see what you did there.

A movie can be filmed in 3d from the start, using a special binocular camera -and twice as much film- (and most completely 3d live action movies are, rather than done with post production effects.) It's a logical step, as it gives us a more accurate picture, much like HD did. 3D animated movies actualy have an advantage, as they only need to render the same video sequences a second time offset a couple inches to get a full 3D effect.

That said, it can be used well, or used poorly. Too many movies that have had 3D lately have done so just to get the extra attention and ticket revenue.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
Whatever. Taly's right.

3D is cool as hell.

Around here, the ticket prices are the same as the 2D version.

I don't know why everyone is *****.



EDIT: what a poorly implemented censor.

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:40 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
I don't care. However I think a crappy rehashed plot "IN 3D!!!!" is still a crappy rehashed plot.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:11 pm 
Offline
Bitterness, Love & Violence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:47 pm
Posts: 459
Location: Valhalla
3D Movies give me headaches!

_________________
"I've got twenty ways to tell you shut the f*ck up / nineteen of them are twenty-four bars long / the other one goes: SHUT THE F*CK UP" - Aesop Rock
"There is no God higher than truth." -- Gandhi
Formerly: Tulamian


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:51 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
Loki wrote:
3D Movies give me headaches!

I noticed something last night, watching my second 3D movie in three days: You don't move your head normally the way you do while watching a 2D movie. I think it has something to do with subconsciously keeping the focus point steady, so you get the full 3D effect; but, for a 2-hour and 45 minute movie like Avatar, that's a long time to sit pretty much rock-still. I consciously started moving my head around to loosen up my neck.

So, the headache could come from that, rather than the actual viewing, so to speak.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
Aethien wrote:
Maybe that should be another poll - reserved seats for movies? :D


I've never heard of such a thing, but I think I would like it better than having to get there way too early to get seats that aren't ridiculous.

As for 3-D, I believe it's simply one more film making tool. Right now it's the new hype machine getting people back into theaters and we're going to see a lot of exploitation of that. Movies re-released in 3-D, and lots of films that suck in 3-D (but probably suck in 2-D as well). It's the same as surround sound or moving from black and white to color. It takes the creators awhile to get comfortable with the medium.

However, I will say, as someone who has a pretty bad-ass home theater, it is one of the reasons I will go see a film in the theater now. When I can buy the film on DVD for less than half what it costs to go to the movies with tickets and snacks, it's a tough sell (not to mention dealing with all the talkers/cellphone idiots/other people in the theater). I'm definitely planning to go see Clash of the Titans in the theater, and if it wasn't in 3-D I would probably be waiting for DVD.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:09 am 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
Corolinth wrote:
I think 3D is the is the biggest farce in artistic production since making a picture move.


I've generally indifferent since it doesn't affect me one way or the other, but I also think it's a huge gimmick.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:11 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
Darkroland wrote:
Aethien wrote:
Maybe that should be another poll - reserved seats for movies? :D


I've never heard of such a thing, but I think I would like it better than having to get there way too early to get seats that aren't ridiculous.

{snip}


It's only certain theaters, certain types of showings. It does make life easier ... So long as someone's not in your seat when you get there.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 234 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group