Screeling wrote:
FarSky wrote:
Ugh. Much like the moronic "
Protest Warriors" that oozed out of the woodwork around the anti-Iraq War protests (which I remember many here lauding), I cannot fracking
stand "counter-protests." What idiots think it's a classy, or even
good, idea to counter-protest a peaceful protest? To what power are you standing up? To what ends do your counter-protests aim?
You're already the group in power, you idiots. "Help, help, I'm bein' repressed!" Much as the counter-protest hawks should have done when the doves were protesting, shut the hell up and let dissenters have their say.
Counter protests can be good in the sense of showing support for those being protested. In Tucson, people protested in front of the Air Force base and other military recruiting centers. Counter-protests were also held on the opposite side of the street to show support for our men and women who serve. Yes, the people showing support for the military weren't actually
protesting anything. But I would hope such counter-protests help maintain the morale, even if to a small extent, of those who provide for our nation's security. Some people on local radio indicated they appreciated it.
But you don't need that support!
You've already got it! When you're the status quo, you've got the support of the people who matter. It's rather like a bully picking on a smaller kid, and then when the smaller kid says something mean in retaliation to the bully, people rally around the bully. I suppose maybe the recruiting center thing is a bit different, as they're more akin to a third party that got dragged into the fray, but that's a rarity among the "protest" and "counter protest" crowds.
That's just part and parcel of being in power...those who aren't currently in power are going to be pissed off and vocal about their perceived lack of say in matters. You need to just suck it up and go about your business, and leave the rabble to either change the minds of the ambivalent masses, or implode.
I suppose a third option is to listen to the minority opposition and bring some of their ideas into the fold to strike a balance between the two opposing viewpoints, thus paving the way for an era of unbridled bipartisanship and fostered cooperation, but I mean, c'mon...I'm not writing a science fiction tale, here.
I'm not sure I expressed my point well enough. The airman driving down the road to get to work on base sees Protest #1 going on. He thinks to himself "Why do I do this? People just hate us." He then looks across the street, sees Protest #2 (the counter-protest) and now says "Ahhh... thats why I do this."
Yes, the airman has the support of the government. You could make the argument that he knows he has the people's support because he has a job. But his perception is likely going to extend to what he sees/hears people saying about him too. That's how the counter-protest can be helpful.