The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:26 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Ladas wrote:
However, atheist are certainly overtly vocal about freedom from religion as a means to suppress any expression, rather than the constitutional freedom of religion.


Yes, many atheists are vocal about the separation of church and state. That is a seprarate topic IMHO.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Aizle wrote:
Yes, many atheists are vocal about the separation of church and state. That is a seprarate topic IMHO.

Not when my comment was in response to these made posts by you and the implications of those posts...

Aizle wrote:
Any time an atheist that I've seen has stated their views, it's been when specifically engaged by someone of faith into a religious conversation


Quote:
really dislike people assuming that I need to be saved and bothering me.


As if the intrusions by one group are for some reason less annoying than the intrusions of the other.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Aizle wrote:
I suspect that one difference may be part of the country. Up here in the Midwest, religion is typically a more private affair than it is down South. At least that was my experience when I lived in Dallas. Up here, it's pretty rare for someone to bring up church or religion at work or in normal socializing conversation. Down in Dallas it was quite common for it to come up both at work and in social activites. In over 35 years of living in the Midwest, I have never had an athiest come up to me to prosthetize either in public or door to door.


I would agree with that, to a point. I live in the midwest. The evangelicals are less obnoxious here than they were when I lived in Texas, and the atheists and other nonChristians more so.

I haven't ever had an atheist come up to me out of the blue to prostelytize. What I have experienced is atheists who once they know you as a passing acquaintance feel perfectly free to start expounding on the evils of religion in front of you and relying on your unwillingness to start an argument on a sensitive topic to ensure you'll allow them to have the floor unchallanged.

Quote:
Yes, many atheists are vocal about the separation of church and state. That is a seprarate topic IMHO.


In theory it's a separate topic. However, as a practical matter it's almost impossible to discuss it separately, especially when you have people like Monty that claim atheism isn't a religion. Constitutionally speaking, it's a religion or it isn't entitled to any protection as one, regardless of whether it's a religion in any other sense. Many atheists, however, seem to feel that "discussing separation of church and state" means "explaining why atheism should be the state religion, especially since it's right anyhow."

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
Diamondeye wrote:
I haven't ever had an atheist come up to me out of the blue to prostelytize. What I have experienced is atheists who once they know you as a passing acquaintance feel perfectly free to start expounding on the evils of religion in front of you and relying on your unwillingness to start an argument on a sensitive topic to ensure you'll allow them to have the floor unchallanged.

I was in class a couple weeks ago and some chick said that "religion [was] f'ing brainwash." I've heard other jabs at specific religions too while in school. I just sit patiently and accept that I will hear things I don't like. Atheists will make comments like this. Religions will proselytize. I can't help but think Atheists do it because they want to insult. Religions do it because they are actually trying to save somebody's soul.

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Diamondeye wrote:
In theory it's a separate topic. However, as a practical matter it's almost impossible to discuss it separately, especially when you have people like Monty that claim atheism isn't a religion. Constitutionally speaking, it's a religion or it isn't entitled to any protection as one, regardless of whether it's a religion in any other sense. Many atheists, however, seem to feel that "discussing separation of church and state" means "explaining why atheism should be the state religion, especially since it's right anyhow."


Atheism isn't a religion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Screeling wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
I haven't ever had an atheist come up to me out of the blue to prostelytize. What I have experienced is atheists who once they know you as a passing acquaintance feel perfectly free to start expounding on the evils of religion in front of you and relying on your unwillingness to start an argument on a sensitive topic to ensure you'll allow them to have the floor unchallanged.

I was in class a couple weeks ago and some chick said that "religion [was] f'ing brainwash." I've heard other jabs at specific religions too while in school. I just sit patiently and accept that I will hear things I don't like. Atheists will make comments like this. Religions will proselytize. I can't help but think Atheists do it because they want to insult. Religions do it because they are actually trying to save somebody's soul.


I can see where you're coming from. Speaking as an atheist, this is a hard thing for me to balance. Typically I don't really share my full feelings about religion in a public place, because it would be impossible to do so without being amazingly condescending.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Ladas wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Yes, many atheists are vocal about the separation of church and state. That is a seprarate topic IMHO.

Not when my comment was in response to these made posts by you and the implications of those posts...

Aizle wrote:
Any time an atheist that I've seen has stated their views, it's been when specifically engaged by someone of faith into a religious conversation


Quote:
really dislike people assuming that I need to be saved and bothering me.


As if the intrusions by one group are for some reason less annoying than the intrusions of the other.


Again, I think we're talking about 2 different things. On one hand you have daily public interaction with the people around you. The atheist I know and have seen typically don't go out trying to pick theological fights with those who are religious. Usually they only bring up the fact that they are atheists when someone who is Christian comes into a public setting and makes bold assumptions that obviously everyone believes in God/Jesus or suggests that everyone should. At that point they are just educating that person that a) no everyone doesn't believe in God/Jesus b) they have the same right to their beliefs as anyone else.

On the other hand, you have the various political situations that come up from time to time where someone is trying to promote a certain religious agenda to the detriment of the country. In those situations, I feel it is any citizens moral duty to speak up on their views.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 10:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Aizle wrote:
Again, I think we're talking about 2 different things.

No, not really. You made the implication that believers, of whatever faith, are the only ones that attempt to "force things down your throat". That is not the case, and atheists are just as guilty.

Quote:
someone is trying to promote a certain religious agenda to the detriment of the country. In those situations, I feel it is any citizens moral duty to speak up on their views.

I would agree, but atheists do not limit themselves to countering religious based agendas, but pursue an agenda of complete freedom from religion, as if the public display that someone else practices a believe is offensive.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Ladas wrote:
I would agree, but atheists do not limit themselves to countering religious based agendas, but pursue an agenda of complete freedom from religion, as if the public display that someone else practices a believe is offensive.


Having a government agency put up a public display of the 10 commandments is a religious based agenda.

I have zero problem with a private citizen or company putting up such a display, the issue is when it is the government endorsing that religion. Beyond that, it's a waste of funds.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 12:22 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Aizle wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
In theory it's a separate topic. However, as a practical matter it's almost impossible to discuss it separately, especially when you have people like Monty that claim atheism isn't a religion. Constitutionally speaking, it's a religion or it isn't entitled to any protection as one, regardless of whether it's a religion in any other sense. Many atheists, however, seem to feel that "discussing separation of church and state" means "explaining why atheism should be the state religion, especially since it's right anyhow."


Atheism isn't a religion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism


For some it most assuredly is. They practice an active disbelief in a deity; for others it comprises a core tenet in their religion. Lastly, weak/implicit atheists are those who have no belief, but don't actively deny a deity. It is only those in the last category who could rationally be considered not to be practicing a religion. The people in the last category aren't the ones being discussed in this thread, much like the non-proselytizing Christians aren't being discussed here.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Vindicarre, I believe your understanding what what actually comprises a religion needs some improvement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/religion

Atheism doesn't in any way attempt to explain the cause, nature and purpose of the universe.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
I think most of this discussion is ridiculous, as I'm finding myself leaning toward existential nihilism lately, but I have to agree with Aizle on the not-a-religion thing. I've also got an active disbelief in Santa Claus (we can even heatedly debate his existence), but that doesn't make a religion. You may even find that many others agree with my reasoning and take up an active disbelief in the man - still no religion.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:19 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Aizle wrote:
Vindicarre, I believe your understanding what what actually comprises a religion needs some improvement.

Gee, I guess you should look over your definition again. Since atheism fits quite nicely in many of the forms you cited:

Quote:
re·li·gion   [ri-lij-uhn] Show IPA
–noun
1.a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4.the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5.the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.religions, Archaic. religious rites.
8.Archaic. strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
—Idiom
9.get religion, Informal.
a.to acquire a deep conviction of the validity of religious beliefs and practices.
b.to resolve to mend one's errant ways: The company got religion and stopped making dangerous products.
Origin:
1150–1200; ME religioun (< OF religion) < L religiōn- (s. of religiō) conscientiousness, piety, equiv. to relig(āre) to tie, fasten (re- re- + ligāre to bind, tie; cf. ligament) + -iōn- -ion; cf. rely


I can understand your reluctance to use the definition in its entirety, as that would tend to undermine your whole premise.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Lenas wrote:
I think most of this discussion is ridiculous, as I'm finding myself leaning toward existential nihilism lately...


Then I guess you'd see the pointlessness inherent in your even presenting your opinion on the subject.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Aizle wrote:
Vindicarre, I believe your understanding what what actually comprises a religion needs some improvement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/religion

Atheism doesn't in any way attempt to explain the cause, nature and purpose of the universe.


Actually there are plenty of atheist "explainations" for the beginning of the universe, from the "infinite universes" to the "it just happens, there doesn't need to be a reason" explainations.

That said, the fact of the matter is that atheism is a religion; it is a positive belief that there isn't a God. Claiming that it isn't is simply a way to get it excused from the complaints about religion in society, and constraints we place on religion in politics. For the purposes of social interaction and political process, it is a religion.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:54 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Vindicarre wrote:
Then I guess you'd see the pointlessness inherent in your even presenting your opinion on the subject.

"The only purpose in life is to live it."

This is just part of living. Most of our conversations here are ultimately pointless. Doesn't mean I have to stop.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:08 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Never said you did; I didn't even tell you it would be more appropriate for your journal as some are wont to do.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:16 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Ah, bringing in external baggage from other threads. Subtle. I politely ask you refrain, wouldn't want to have to start moderating.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:30 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Oh, gee, sorry. I was referencing the last time I recalled someone telling someone else not to post. Since the threads don't exist in a vacuum, I thought it was rather apropos. Fair enough, I know when to use deference to my betters. Won't happen again.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Vindicarre wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Vindicarre, I believe your understanding what what actually comprises a religion needs some improvement.

Gee, I guess you should look over your definition again. Since atheism fits quite nicely in many of the forms you cited:

Quote:
re·li·gion   [ri-lij-uhn] Show IPA
–noun
1.a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4.the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5.the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.religions, Archaic. religious rites.
8.Archaic. strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
—Idiom
9.get religion, Informal.
a.to acquire a deep conviction of the validity of religious beliefs and practices.
b.to resolve to mend one's errant ways: The company got religion and stopped making dangerous products.
Origin:
1150–1200; ME religioun (< OF religion) < L religiōn- (s. of religiō) conscientiousness, piety, equiv. to relig(āre) to tie, fasten (re- re- + ligāre to bind, tie; cf. ligament) + -iōn- -ion; cf. rely


I can understand your reluctance to use the definition in its entirety, as that would tend to undermine your whole premise.


Except as Ladas pointed out we're talking about a lack of belief. Are non-easter bunny believers their own religion? How about people who are convinced that Tarot card readings are true. Widji boards?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:48 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
How is it a lack of belief? Can you prove there is no god (deliberate little "g")?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Aizle wrote:
Not per se. I do however value my privacy, and really dislike people assuming that I need to be saved and bothering me. Interestingly, there are these big buildings, usually with signs that let me know both where to go, and what times to show up if I'm interested in finding Jesus.


I see. So it's not Freedom of Religion you find disagreeable, it's Freedom of Speech?

;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
I believe having a "lack of belief" is agnostic. But I'm not sure. Don't really care.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Aizle wrote:
Except as Ladas pointed out we're talking about a lack of belief. Are non-easter bunny believers their own religion? How about people who are convinced that Tarot card readings are true. Widji boards?

Lack of belief, uncertainty, apathy, along with a few other things, would fall under agnostic. Active belief in the non-existence of a god is Atheism.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 4:39 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Ladas wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Except as Ladas pointed out we're talking about a lack of belief. Are non-easter bunny believers their own religion? How about people who are convinced that Tarot card readings are true. Widji boards?

Lack of belief, uncertainty, apathy, along with a few other things, would fall under agnostic. Active belief in the non-existence of a god is Atheism.


This discussion arises again. Hoo-rah.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group