Khross wrote:
I would suggest that your average suicide bomber is a victim, while his handler is not. Per our other discussion on the relative levels of extremism, I would point out that the guy who blows himself up for someone else's cause without access to other information is indeed a victim most of the time. This doesn't excuse the action; this doesn't deny culpability. It simply means that the expendable and exploited are victims of the power machine using them as weapons (in most cases).
I would not. The average suicide bomber does what he does for financial reward, as does the average guy out diging in an IED. This does not make them victims except in the way that a drug user who robs a liquor store is a "victim" of the guy selling the drugs.
He may, indeed, not be an extremist, but he's definitely a mercenary. Calling him a victim tends to excuse him to a degree that he does not deserve.