Kirra wrote:
I just think people react differently to situations. I don't believe it means you are not a kind/caring parent if you are not the high strung type. People that react to situations differently, I have found, never see eye to eye. My personality is the non-reactive type. I act appropriately and get the job done, but I am not loud/screamer type in emergency situations. I don't understand those type and they don't understand me. We both do what is right in the emergency, but there are always comments about the perception of the event.
I think the father reacted the way his personality is, it's unfortunate what happened, but he obviously percieved a threat to his child and reacted to the situation. Other people would react to this same situation differently. Just the way your personality is.
I don't think it has much to do with personality type, but initial perceptions. From the limited information we have, it seems that the father percieved his infant child to be in danger and possibly already harmed, and dealt with the problem in the most efficient manner possible wasting no time eliminating any threats to his child and at the same time moving to help his child.
The gift of hindsight is always 20-20. It is likely there was no threat. But in the brief instant he percieved he was one, he erred on the side of his infant child.
That is always the right decision.
_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.
Ezekiel 23:19-20