The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 6:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
News at 11

I must say she hit the nail on the head on how I personally am currently torn on the religion.

Specifically liked this part:

Quote:
“My faith in Christ is central to my life. My conversion from a pessimistic atheist lost in a world I didn't understand, to an optimistic believer in a universe created and sustained by a loving God is crucial to me," Rice wrote. "But following Christ does not mean following His followers. Christ is infinitely more important than Christianity and always will be, no matter what Christianity is, has been or might become.”


I'd say her devotion to Christ is a bit stronger than mine at the moment, but I agree with her overall sentiment.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
In other words, she's not leaving Christianity at all; she's just not going to.. well, be a fundamentalist, looks like.

Interesting, though, that she's doing so based on their apparent failure to adhere to her political views, and that she seems to want to lump all 2.1 billion Chrisitians into that category. I'm thinking she may have misunderstood a few basic concepts, but really, her decision hardly warrants much attention.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
In other words, she's able to separate the belief from the dogma of the religion.

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
I thought writing her novel about Jesus in the first person was an odd choice for a Christian.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:15 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
She lasted longer than I thought she would and took away the important stuff.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:42 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
NephyrS wrote:
In other words, she's able to separate the belief from the dogma of the religion.


I don't know what distinction you think you're making here. "Dogma" is just a word for doctrine that has acquired negative connotations and stigma for some reason.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:10 am 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
From what I'm reading she's confusing the Roman Catholic Church with the whole of Christianity(TM). She hasn't "left Christianity", she's just left the RCC and isn't participating in church anymore. Or, at least, not church as she's accustomed to thinking of it. I take a fairly broad view of what constitutes church. That said, I've seen a lot of ex-Catholics who are so burned out and angry with Catholicism that they don't want to have anything to do with anything that might resemble church at all. While I can understand that sentiment, I hope she's not among those who have turned their backs completely on the rest of the body.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
Diamondeye wrote:
NephyrS wrote:
In other words, she's able to separate the belief from the dogma of the religion.


I don't know what distinction you think you're making here. "Dogma" is just a word for doctrine that has acquired negative connotations and stigma for some reason.


More specifically, dogma is a word for religious doctrine. You can't use dogma synonymously with doctrine outside of the connotation of religion.

A religion is made up of two parts- the beliefs of the individuals and their personal commitment/relationship with the deity they worship, and the centralized doctrine of the religion, which along with the belief itself often stipulates certain ways to act, things to do/not do, and a certain amount of necessary ceremony to include in the religion.

To separate the belief from the dogma is to be able to continue your personal belief/relationship (in this case) with God, without needing a centralized doctrine and ceremony to back it up.

In other words, you keep the belief but leave the church/religion.

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
NephyrS wrote:
More specifically, dogma is a word for religious doctrine. You can't use dogma synonymously with doctrine outside of the connotation of religion.

A religion is made up of two parts- the beliefs of the individuals and their personal commitment/relationship with the deity they worship, and the centralized doctrine of the religion, which along with the belief itself often stipulates certain ways to act, things to do/not do, and a certain amount of necessary ceremony to include in the religion.

To separate the belief from the dogma is to be able to continue your personal belief/relationship (in this case) with God, without needing a centralized doctrine and ceremony to back it up.

In other words, you keep the belief but leave the church/religion.


^^This in a nutshell is my fundamental stumbling block on religion right now. I admire the loving, forgiving nature of the Christian God, as well as the messages of temperance, humbleness, etc. But there's also a lot of sheer stupidity that comes with the Christian doctrine that makes no sense and seems flat-out contradictory to God's loving nature. It seems to me that much of the doctrine (mainly the "list of cannot's" and "abominations") and ceremony were invented by strictly by Man to keep control. I feel that God really frowns on many of the things Christians believe.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:30 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
NephyrS wrote:
I don't know what distinction you think you're making here. "Dogma" is just a word for doctrine that has acquired negative connotations and stigma for some reason.


More specifically, dogma is a word for religious doctrine. You can't use dogma synonymously with doctrine outside of the connotation of religion.

A religion is made up of two parts- the beliefs of the individuals and their personal commitment/relationship with the deity they worship, and the centralized doctrine of the religion, which along with the belief itself often stipulates certain ways to act, things to do/not do, and a certain amount of necessary ceremony to include in the religion.

To separate the belief from the dogma is to be able to continue your personal belief/relationship (in this case) with God, without needing a centralized doctrine and ceremony to back it up.

In other words, you keep the belief but leave the church/religion.[/quote]

Except that this disitinction does not really exist. The beliefs themself are part of the doctrine as well, and are what dictate the form of the various aspects of worship are. If you're leaving the church but retaining the belief, what you're doing is schisming, and creating a new denomination of one (yourself), or switching to another stablished denomination.

It's all fine and dandy, but you're only leaving the religion if you're moving to an entirely separate belief system. If you're leaving the church, that's fine, people leave them all the time. However, very few churches have dogma or doctrine that exist for no reason. Practically all of them are based on some interpretation of Scripture or other, just as the differences between different types of Moslems are based on different interpretations of Mohammed's will for who was to succeed him. If you want to make up your own doctrine, go right ahead, but there's a certain arrogance to deciding to leave because church doctrine doesn't fit your political views. If you really do believe in God, it takes a fair amount of hubris to think He agrees with any earthly political position.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:57 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
Yes it does, however church leaders in most faiths do it all the time. Oh, they usually phrase the political position as God wants you to live like this and back it up with scripture that can be interpreted that way. Someone else will come along and find a scripture that seems to oppose that point. The Holy wars go on and on.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
the everlasting lurker

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:10 am
Posts: 158
Location: In a maze of twisty little passages, all alike (aka metro Detroit)
Spoiler:
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
I don't think the pope cares.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:36 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
I am sure the pope is in the Vatican going "Oh Noes! who will write the next Jesus was a vampire killer novel?"

My big question... is her writing going to stop being a joke? Are we going to get any more good books from her?

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:51 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
You seem to be implying that she ever wrote anything but garbage in the first place...

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:59 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Rynar wrote:
You seem to be implying that she ever wrote anything but garbage in the first place...


I enjoyed many of her Vampire Chronicles books. She may never be Charles Dickens calibur, but she is better than many authors ever will be.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
darksiege wrote:
Jesus was a vampire killer

Image

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:32 am 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
that movie was horrible Kaffis, I have actually watched it.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:41 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
To each there own, I suppose, but I thought they were crap. Then again, I'm a total sci-fi/fantasy geek, so I can't exact write them off as meaningless trash.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:48 am 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
Monte wrote:
I thought writing her novel about Jesus in the first person was an odd choice for a Christian.

Haha.

All I care about is how lame she helped make vampires. Damn you Rice!

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
My only familiarity with Anne Rice's work are via the movies made of them.

Interview With Brad Pitt was enjoyable, if not a bit . . . overwrought. She seemed to take the whole vampires as glamorous poofters route.

My view of vampires is a bit complex:
I think that they are an amalgam of all of the different portrayals (yes, even Twilight) -- somewhat vulnerable and emo; yet strong and confident; enjoying the glamorous, bourgeoise lifestyle; yet not afraid to lurk in the dark shanty places; hunters of blood; yet also patient seducers; warriors, lovers, poets, overlords, subjects, average Joe/Jane.


Anyway, back on topic: yes I agree her even becoming Christian to begin with was a bit odd, given her persona, but then again, a spiritual awakening can happen to anyone.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:02 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Rodahn wrote:

My view of vampires is a bit complex:
I think that they are an amalgam of all of the different portrayals (yes, even Twilight) -- somewhat vulnerable and emo; yet strong and confident; enjoying the glamorous, bourgeoise lifestyle...


What's glamorous about the middle-class lifestyle?

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
Bourgeoise were considered pretty well-off in their day. It's basically just an expression now.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
I think someone's just trying to sell some books.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:23 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
I have to disagree. Bourgeoisie = middle class.
The were a target because they had assets, and they might have seemed well off to the poor...
Kinda like Anne Rice saying Christ is central to her life, but she's leaving Christianity; somehow the two don't make sense, unless you believe the words have alternate meanings.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 323 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group