The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 6:41 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Your Maths is Fail.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Recently, I have seen argued here and in the media that the Democratic Party has a super majority in the Senate. And I've been scratching my head pretty vigorously about it.

There are currently 57 democrats, 41 Republicans, and 2 independent senators. One of those independents tends to vote with the Democrats, but Joe Lieberman is frequently on the Republican side of the aisle when it comes to the biggest and most important legislation.

Before Ted Kennedy died, the Democrats had 58 seats. Again, there is one independent that pretty much votes with the Democrats, but Joe Liebermann is a wild card, especially on major agenda items.

So, for those of you who want to believe that senate inaction is entirely the fault of the Democratic party, the math just doesn't add up. If one senator from the party of opposition filibusters, the Democrats are *forced* look look to independents or the other side of the aisle to stop that filibuster. At the moment, The Democrats have to flip two republicans to stop any filibuster that happens, and the number of cloture votes forced by republican filibusters and filibuster threats has been completely over the top.

The Republican Party has put stops on scores of judicial appointments and literally hundreds of bills. And yet, there are people here and in the media still blaming Democrats for Republican obstructionism. Where was their fiscal discipline under the last administration? When did they oppose big spending and big deficits?

Anyway, point of this is simple - if you think the Democrats have a super majority in congress, you are simply incorrect. If you think that a majority in congress is enough to get anything passed without supreme effort, you are also wrong. And if you blame Democrats for that choke hold on the Senate, you are being willfully ignorant. So quit it. Please.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Your Maths is Fail.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:23 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
There is no such thing as "obstructionism". It's not the job of Republicans to let the Democrats pass whatever they want. If they want Republicans to not filibuster, they need to write better legislation.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Your Maths is Fail.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:33 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Diamondeye:

I've posted the rules about a half dozen times. A bill must pass cloture in the Senate to be voted upon if it was put up for debate. That's just all there is to it. If the Democrats can't get a bill to pass cloture, then they need to shut the **** up.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:51 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
I don't believe anyone on this board has made any point to complain about Senate inaction. So I'm not entirely sure who you think your intended audience is.

Additionally, I find it highly ironic you would post thread with a title like this one given you just recently displayed a gross incapability to comprehend the simple concept of proportions versus total values by your posts here and here. Of course, it's pretty convenient that one can just ignore such a glaring error, and error which would be inconsistent with oft-made assertions that would require basic math skills to make, and pretend like it never happened. Or worse yet, be completely ignorant to the entire situation due to the aforementioned vacant math skills.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:02 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Quote:
the Democrats are *forced* look look to independents or the other side of the aisle to stop that filibuster. At the moment, The Democrats have to flip two republicans to stop any filibuster that happens, and the number of cloture votes forced by republican filibusters and filibuster threats has been completely over the top.


Back in the day we used to call that building a consensus, and it was thought to be a good thing. Ya know since the government is supposed to represent the consensus of the people and all that.

The harder it is to pass federal legislation ( the larger a consensus needed) the better off the people are, not matter what animal has the majority.

Other Presidents, including Clinton (and I think pretty much everyone in the last 35 years)had worse numbers and they managed to pass good amounts of their adgenda. If you're having trouble with the senate it's because your adgenda is too much against the concenus of the people.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Last edited by Rorinthas on Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:13 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
When some one does not vote for your legislation they are an obstructionist, when they do, they are Bi-partisan.

When you vote against their legislation, or hold it up, you are standing up for your constituents. If you vote for their legislation you are a traitor.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Your Maths is Fail.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:26 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Khross wrote:
Diamondeye:

I've posted the rules about a half dozen times. A bill must pass cloture in the Senate to be voted upon if it was put up for debate. That's just all there is to it. If the Democrats can't get a bill to pass cloture, then they need to shut the **** up.


I know you have. I'm pointing out that expecting the other party to vote with you just because it's your turn to get your way, or something, is ridiculous. This isn't kindergarten.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:42 am 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
Rafael wrote:
I don't believe anyone on this board has made any point to complain about Senate inaction. So I'm not entirely sure who you think your intended audience is.


Perhaps Monty feels they aren't passing enough legislation?

It'd probably be best if congress did nothing at all. YMMV.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
I'd be curious to see how many of these contentious bills that didn't pass had 100% affirmative votes from the Democrats out of the total number of votes taken.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Some liberals are upset with what they perceive as a lack of progress on key issues with the Obama administration.

Many of the issues he made his name on have either not panned out or have been ignored. He's basically run Iraq in the exact same manner Bush did. Gitmo is still open. They've seen only token gestures so far on dont ask dont tell and gay issues. As big a deal as the healthcare bill was, they didnt get single payer and feel they gave far too many concessions.

All this with a large majority and the presidency. I think it's a stretch to nitpick numbers and try to imply blame on the republicans for lack of progress on their agenda.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Your Maths is Fail.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:53 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Which seat recently changed hands to a Republican in an interim election? That's the thing missing here. I can't remember which seat it was, but that's neither here nor there. The Republicans had only 40 seats for the majority of the last 18 months.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Your Maths is Fail.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:22 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Scott Brown, of Massachusetts, who has been a huge disappointment compiling a voting record more liberal than Olympia Snowe in the short time he has been a US Senator.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:33 am 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
You vouched that guy at one point, Rynar. What's the deal?

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:36 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Screeling wrote:
You vouched that guy at one point, Rynar. What's the deal?


I know him personally. He has done nothing but let me down. Apparently he is more interested in being a politician than a leader.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Your Maths is Fail.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:49 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Rynar wrote:
Scott Brown, of Massachusetts, who has been a huge disappointment compiling a voting record more liberal than Olympia Snowe in the short time he has been a US Senator.

That's very conservative for Massachusetts :lol:

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Yeah, disappointing or not, as it's replacing Kennedy, it's still a conservative(-ish) turn for the seat.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Rorinthas wrote:
The harder it is to pass federal legislation (the larger a consensus needed) the better off the people are, not matter what animal has the majority.


Do you feel the same way about the difficulty with repealing existing legislation, cutting spending, etc.? Because procedural hurdles go both ways.

Rorinthas wrote:
If you're having trouble with the senate it's because your agenda is too much against the consensus of the people.


Or it's because our political system is designed to slow down change by creating multiple veto points and enabling a committed minority to prevent even a clear majority from doing much. So, you can easily have a situation where 59 Senators, representing roughly two-thirds of the American people, want to do X, but 41 Senators, representing only one-third of the people, can stop them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:16 am 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
RangerDave wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
The harder it is to pass federal legislation (the larger a consensus needed) the better off the people are, not matter what animal has the majority.


Do you feel the same way about the difficulty with repealing existing legislation, cutting spending, etc.? Because procedural hurdles go both ways.


Yes.

1) Because those things never happen anyway.
2) Because legislative stagnation of any type is better for the people at large

RD wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
If you're having trouble with the senate it's because your agenda is too much against the consensus of the people.


Or it's because our political system is designed to slow down change by creating multiple veto points and enabling a committed minority to prevent even a clear majority from doing much. So, you can easily have a situation where 59 Senators, representing roughly two-thirds of the American people, want to do X, but 41 Senators, representing only one-third of the people, can stop them.



Yes, yes it is. This is good.

And therefore, people should quit ***** about how it works just because they want their pet project to go through. "This damn system that exists to protect the population from change, tyranny, and mob rule needs to go, it's blatant obstructionism!"

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 333 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group