The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:59 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:43 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Dash wrote:

I cant help but think if a guy 5'7 and 135 lbs stepped into the ring with say, Muhammad Ali at 6'3 215.. he'd get crushed.



If all they did was box, yes. But if that 5'7 guy is say one of the Gracies and it's use your own style to win, if Ali doesn't knock him out before Gracie get's hold of him, Gracie wins easy.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
A jiu-jitsu fighter giving up nearly 100 pounds is going to have a lot of trouble against even a terrible ground fighter.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:39 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
Dash wrote:
I still think if you're talking a pound for pound fighter, based on some discipline with rules and judges that's one thing. Or if you're saying matched up against people roughly the same size. Simply "who would win" though is something else.

I cant help but think if a guy 5'7 and 135 lbs stepped into the ring with say, Muhammad Ali at 6'3 215.. he'd get crushed.

I think of this a lot when I watch MMA. I'm the 5'7", 155-pound guy who would get crushed. But, back in the old days, so to speak, I watched some Russian guy who looked like a stick drop much bigger guys with his elbows. It was kind of mesmerizing.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:52 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
Strength and mass are certainly factors in BJJ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Lenas wrote:
Dash wrote:
Who did he fight?


Gary Elms, Pu Chung, Uechi, Wong Jack Man, and apparently a lot of non-sanctioned, street/random fights that only have third party reports of Lee destroying faces.


Pretty interesting article here on the Wong Jack Man fight:

http://www.lakungfu.com/sifujackmanwong.html

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:09 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Timmit wrote:
A jiu-jitsu fighter giving up nearly 100 pounds is going to have a lot of trouble against even a terrible ground fighter.


You should check out some literature about Yukio Tani. Hell, the entire Fusen-Ryu lineage of which Tani was purportedly at least partially descendant from, is a very interesting story. Particularly how it compelled the shape of Judo into incorporating more ne-waza techniques during the time of Mataemon Tanabe.

Try, Blood on the Sun: The Odyssy of Yukio Tani by Graham Noble. Tani was a 125 pound man who defeated many opponents in England for prize money, many of which were security professionals or prize fighters in other arenas themselves.

The interesting aspect of ne-waza is that it puts the human body in an orientation wrt the ground and direction that weight acts in such a way that is counter-intuitive and must be trained. Everything from the direction the body must move, which muscle groups to engage and how to orient the body efficiently so they become the engaging group of muscles and so forth must be trained into muscle memory. Simple things like sitting up, moving sideways on the hips to control space and how to orient the body to gain mobility for the least amount of energy is a science rooted in physics and kinseology.

This fact is where the strategy of Fusen-Ryu developed is rooted and gave them the ability to dominate the Kodokan Judo school at the turn of the 20th century. The strategy being to not engage the opponent where his physical traits and training give him an advantage and place him in a mode of combat where such physical differentials are reduced or even reversed (getting off one's back is much more difficult for a bulky, muscular man for instance) and develop a system of techniques suited for such a mode. Tanabe knew he had a massive advantage in technique knowledge and skill in ne-waza. The result was so decisive, that Kano asked Tanabe to teach his system at the Kodokan itself.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
Dash wrote:
I still think if you're talking a pound for pound fighter, based on some discipline with rules and judges that's one thing. Or if you're saying matched up against people roughly the same size. Simply "who would win" though is something else.

I cant help but think if a guy 5'7 and 135 lbs stepped into the ring with say, Muhammad Ali at 6'3 215.. he'd get crushed.




Ali beat Foreman.

Bruce trained way harder than Ali...so hard that one mistake ended up killing him.


back injury...equagesic...cerebral edema...very sad.




"THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!" /jack black off



EDIT: Oh, and it's way harder to hit a smaller guy especially if he's fast and smart, kinda like how it's difficult to punch a fly.

EDIT: Damn these edits and multiple posts, by the time I'm done writing what I want to add I forget to copy it over to the previous post and end up making a new one.




TheRiov wrote:
Strength and mass are certainly factors in BJJ



One of the reasons I prefer stand up fighting. It relies too much on strength and mass. In order to get those attributes, you [usually?] end up sacrificing so much more...speed..flexibility...speed....speeeed and speed and power and agility. And speed.

The other reasons....stand up fighting is much more effective versus multiple attackers, and it's safer because you can flee more quickly and you have much more options with other possible threats. Also, I just wouldn't consider training in a way that involves being on the floor embracing another man. It's not homophobic, I just like to stay on my feet and not let any other part of my body touch the ground. Now a woman...I'd wrestle. But only cause I wouldn't want to hurt them! And another reason... ;)






EDIT: Oh, and BJJ sounds waaaay too much like BJ.

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Last edited by Nevandal on Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:42 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
Nevandal wrote:
One of the reasons I prefer stand up fighting. It relies too much on strength and mass. In order to get those attributes, you [usually?] end up sacrificing so much more...speed..flexibility...speed....speeeed and speed and power and agility. And speed.
Stand up fighting very much depends on size and strength as well, just not as much as ground fighting. In a stand up fight you're going to be almost as screwed fighting a guy 80 (hell even 25-30 is a big deal) pounds heavier than you (assuming he's not just a big fatty) as a 135 pound bjj fighter against some 205 pound guy.

Speed and agility is great and all, but all things being (anywhere close to) equal, the bigger guy is going to win.

The good big guy is going to beat the very good small guy most of the time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
Thankfully most big guy's aren't that good. They're just big.

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
Yeah, god help the UFC heavyweight division if Brock Lesnar ever gets good at anything but wrestling...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
his name is Brock

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
Oh yeah, here's a good analogy I thought of, for the UFC. The UFC often tends to favor strength and mass.

People win fights in the UFC by getting stronger and bigger the same way that people win fights in old school RPGs (FF7) by grinding 10 levels ahead and then snoozing through the battles.

At least there are weight classes. But even within weight classes, because people train for strength and mass primarily, it kind of takes a lot of the skill aspect out of the game, not to mention the fact that so many effective techniques that make martial arts interesting to me are completely illegal or impractical because of the cage.


Not to mention the abuse of the weigh-in system totally negates the point of having weight classes, in my opinion. And most of the fights in the UFC resort to crawling around on the ground trying to pin an arm or leg. I'd rather watch Boxing.


[youtube]smjPDN49uHo[/youtube]

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
I kind of wish that wrestlers/MMA fighters had to weigh in 5 minutes before the fight, but I'm in the vast minority, I think...

As for boxing, Don King ruined boxing. I can't watch it anymore. Plus there's too many champions in each class. Who cares who the heavyweight champion is when there's 1,500 heavyweight champions...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
Timmit wrote:
I kind of wish that wrestlers/MMA fighters had to weigh in 5 minutes before the fight, but I'm in the vast minority, I think...

As for boxing, Don King ruined boxing. I can't watch it anymore. Plus there's too many champions in each class. Who cares who the heavyweight champion is when there's 1,500 heavyweight champions...



Yup. Boxers used to weigh in an hour before the fight...I'm not sure how it is now, but if it's anything like it is in the UFC now, it's retarded. Doing the cutting / gaining thing to cheat the weigh-in system is lame. I wish the fighters would just train to be healthy and ready to fight and just end up in whatever weight class they end up in instead of training for strength / mass and cheating the system. They should change it to weigh in just before the fight.

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:53 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
As light on his feet and as fast as he could punch, definitely. But the point of this thread was not who is/was the best martial artist ever, but which celebrity outside the martial arts would take down the others.

Muhammad Ali was primarily a martial artist, one of the finest boxers to grace the ring in the twentieth century. He also evolved the art of trash talking promotion to a higher level than ever seen before, but that was part of the martial arts world.

I posed this question to one of my friends at work, he said Jackie Chan, no question - none of those guys could keep a straight face or more importantly their focus once Jackie started making faces and running his comedy routine. Heck, most of them would be asking for his autograph. Jackie gets a lot of love and respect in Hollywood we don't see out here.

I don't know if he's right, but I have to admit comedy is as much a weapon of Chan's as anything else he does.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:05 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Nevandal wrote:
One of the reasons I prefer stand up fighting. It relies too much on strength and mass. In order to get those attributes, you [usually?] end up sacrificing so much more...speed..flexibility...speed....speeeed and speed and power and agility. And speed.

The other reasons....stand up fighting is much more effective versus multiple attackers, and it's safer because you can flee more quickly and you have much more options with other possible threats. Also, I just wouldn't consider training in a way that involves being on the floor embracing another man. It's not homophobic, I just like to stay on my feet and not let any other part of my body touch the ground. Now a woman...I'd wrestle. But only cause I wouldn't want to hurt them! And another reason... ;)

EDIT: Oh, and BJJ sounds waaaay too much like BJ.


The most important elements to ground grappling systems derived from Judo or catch wrestling/shoot and hook styles are primarily timing and deception, not speed or strength. Agility and flexibility are ancillary. By restraining a person's mass to where he must fight his own weight and move in a manner unfamiliar unless trained is entire concept behind putting a combat situation in that phase.

If fleeing is the most effective self defense tactic (and it certainly is), I would propose that parkour is the most effective martial art on the planet.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
Rafael wrote:
If fleeing is the most effective self defense tactic (and it certainly is), I would propose that parkour is the most effective martial art on the planet.

This thread isn't about self defense, though, it's about who would "win" a fight. You don't win a fight by avoiding fighting ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Actually, that's the best way to win.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 733
Monte wrote:
Actually, that's the best way to win.

No, it's arguably the best way to survive and situationally the best "defense" but it's not how you "win" a fight.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
I win if the fight never occurs. At least, that's how I see it. If I fight, I lose, even if I am victorious. Victory and winning? Not so much the same thing, I think.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
The best way to win a fight is to never leave the house...heck, don't get out of bed. Obviously, Bed-FU is the best martial art ever.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:49 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Monte wrote:
I win if the fight never occurs. At least, that's how I see it. If I fight, I lose, even if I am victorious. Victory and winning? Not so much the same thing, I think.


How very Mr. Miagi of you.

(which isn't to say I disagree at all)

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Miagi had a lot of good **** to say, lol. His quotes are terribly useful in teaching Italian rapier, in fact.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:46 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Monte wrote:
Miagi had a lot of good **** to say, lol. His quotes are terribly useful in teaching Italian rapier, in fact.


Well of course he had good **** to say, he was a character written by a 20 year practitioner of Goju-Ryu.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:27 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Timmit wrote:
Monte wrote:
Actually, that's the best way to win.

No, it's arguably the best way to survive and situationally the best "defense" but it's not how you "win" a fight.


This goes back to my entire point of that premise of the martial art must define how "victory" is attained.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group