Aizle wrote:
Quote:
He rejected the notion that Obama had been recognized prematurely for his efforts and said the committee wanted to promote the president just it had Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 in his efforts to open up the Soviet Union.
"His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population," it said.
Bolding mine. I believe that is the relevant portion.
I'm pleased with the award and hope that is helps bear fruit with our diplomatic efforts abroad.
Considering that Gorbachev was de facto leader of the USSR from 1985 forward, implemented perestroika in 1986, introduced Glastnost in 1988, implemented the ability of citizens to own private businesses in a wide range of previously blocked areas also in 1988, created free elections in 1989, and as a result of his efforts, was elected to essentially the same post, but by general election this time, in 1990, that quote that you found to be "the relevant portion" is highly suspect and intellectually dishonest at best, an outright lie at worst.
Personally, the most important quote in that article is:
Quote:
Obama took office less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline
Two weeks... so what exactly was the basis for his nomination? His stellar record of abstain or vacant on Senate bills for the single term he was in office for the US Senate?
I'd love to know on what credentials you think he was nominated, and how you think his previous performance in politics compares the achievements and actions of Gorbachev in the same time span prior to being awarded the Peace Prize.