The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:31 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:44 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Just a question about how much priority do vehicles have in saving someone's life. How much does/should traffic yield? This question is generic in context, meaning the vehicle(s) may be traversing one block at 1 a.m. in Suburbsville or Smalltown where it encounters no cars, or it may be trying to get through downtown Manhattan in gridlocked traffic where it requires hundreds or maybe thousands of commuters and other traffic to yield.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:56 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
I'm not sure I understand your question.

If you're driving and you hear the sirens you should be cautious and keep your eyes open for where the vehicle is.

Legally All traffic allong the route should yeild even when they have the green light, and all traffic on the same roadway within view of the ESV should stop and pull over to right.


It sounds like a no brainer to me.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
The only issue I have ever seen with response vehicles was just recently actually...

I-26 had a nasty wreck just east of Columbia and had end of holiday traffic backed up for miles (not this last holiday).

The responding HP and FD units all used the extra wide shoulder, typical of interstates, to get to the accident. For some reason, the ambulance decided the best path of travel was right up the middle of the 2 lanes going that direction, so cars in both lanes had to move to the edges, which then forced the cars on the right to move back to the middle to clear for the next FD or HP unit.

Made absolutely no sense, and because of the confusion by the drivers of where to move, cost that Ambulance a lot of time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:14 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
. . .

What Rori said, them's the rules.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:12 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
It's not totally a no-brainer. Can ambulances exceed the speed limit? In most places, yes. But by how much should they be allowed to exceed it? Can/should an ambulance be going 70 in a 30mph zone? I think most people would say no to that hypothetical. They get special dispensation because they're trying to save lives and/or property, but that dispensation shouldn't extend to risking other lives and property in the process. Witness the debate around high speed police chases, for instance.

But I've also seen this issue play out in less obvious ways. I was at an intersection with very bad sight lines (cross-traffic would not be able to see an approaching emergency vehicle until it was just a few feet from the intersection stop bars). An ambulance approached the intersection after the light had been red for some time, and traffic was already stacked up at the light. The ambulance driver started blaring his horn at the cars in front of him because they wouldn't immediately jump out into the intersection. But from where he was positioned, the cross-traffic couldn't see the ambulance, and they weren't stopping for him. They hesitated, and I don't blame them. Things like that are where I draw the line. It wouldn't have been unreasonable at an intersection with good visibility, but he was basically expecting people to jump in front of oncoming traffic for him.

Incidentally, the rules for how one must respond to an emergency vehicle will vary from state to state. In Texas, at least, you are always required to yield right-of-way, but you aren't required to pull over and stop outright unless traffic conditions permit.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:09 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
I'm fairly certain (DE please back me up on this) That here in Ohio you have to get permission from dispatch for Code 3 (lights and Sirens) but once you do you're pretty limited to operator descretion from there out. If you're being granted the Code 3, then they want you to get there as fast as you humanly can.

My Pastor who is the department Chaplain experienced Police Code 3s where the officer has gone 80 in a 35. He did call this person a rookie who was acting like he had something to proove.

Forcing people to move against the light is a bad idea, but i'm thinking he probably should have went around him and wonder if some people didn't ignore the oncoming siren. On coming traffic should have been stopped too and he should have just been able to go past them.

I'm sure all our first responders get detailed training on what acceptable code 3 behavior is (local experts please feel free to share)

If you think a ESV has responded in a negative fashion please get the vehicle number and contact the services non emergency number. I'm sure they'd be happy to address your concern.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:35 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Rafael wrote:
Just a question about how much priority do vehicles have in saving someone's life. How much does/should traffic yield? This question is generic in context, meaning the vehicle(s) may be traversing one block at 1 a.m. in Suburbsville or Smalltown where it encounters no cars, or it may be trying to get through downtown Manhattan in gridlocked traffic where it requires hundreds or maybe thousands of commuters and other traffic to yield.


Absolute priority. Even funeral processions must yield.

This is, of course limited by the physical ability to yield safely which varies with conditions. No one, for example, should yield by stopping on a railroad track.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:38 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Rorinthas wrote:
I'm fairly certain (DE please back me up on this) That here in Ohio you have to get permission from dispatch for Code 3 (lights and Sirens) but once you do you're pretty limited to operator descretion from there out. If you're being granted the Code 3, then they want you to get there as fast as you humanly can.


This depends on department policy. Generally speaking, policy will dictate the response for general types of calls. The supervisor or dispatcher may elevate or reduce the response code based on specific circumstances, and the officer will generally have some leeway based on conditions.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:34 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Maybe that's just here then that i've heard they have to request from dispatch.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:41 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
No matter what you think, you are not inside the vehicle, you do not know why the lights and sirens are being used. If you insist on being an ******* and not yielding you may be interfering with the vehicle and personnel that may be saving someone's life. Do you really want to take that chance?

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:30 pm 
Offline
Consummate Professional
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:23 am
Posts: 920
Location: The battlefield. As always.
Iowa protocol, for the record, is that lights and sirens is driver discretion and no one else's. Ambulances can violate traffic laws if they must in order to provide the most expedient and safe care to the patient, but only with lights and sirens going.

EMT courses, however, generally discourage lights and sirens if the patient is conscious.

_________________
Image

Grenade 3 Sports Drink. It's fire in the hole.. Your hole!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
My policy on ESVs... I get the hell out of their way (safely). I do not want some cocksmith being the reason I do not get to an ER in time; as such I will not be a cock to anyone else trying to not die

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Get the **** out of the way. Nuff said.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:11 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
This question assumes you are in a state/county where the policy that vehicles are required to yield to Emergency Services Vehicles. Let me rephrase the question: how much should we yield to vehicles that require "emergency priority"?

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Last edited by Rafael on Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Even if you aren't required to do so, get the **** out of the way.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:15 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Monte wrote:
Even if you aren't required to do so, get the **** out of the way.


Ok, so what would be even safer is if we had knew what path the dispatched vehicle required and froze all traffic on it until the vehicle has accomplished it's task. Do you agree this is the case?

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Sure, although I don't think that's always necessary. If the rule is "everyone goes to the right", great.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:21 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Should the ambulance be allowed to go triple the speed limit if it increases the patient's chance of survival by 33%?

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:49 pm
Posts: 3455
Location: St. Louis, MO
I am not sure where you are going with this. I am comfortably certain that all 50 states, as part of a resident's licensing requirement, demand that resident recognize the primacy of an emergency services vehicle's right of way in the pursuit of its duties (i.e. flashers and sirens active). One would hope that drivers of emergency services vehicles are well trained and display consistently good and swift decision making.

Rafael wrote:
Ok, so what would be even safer is if we had knew what path the dispatched vehicle required and froze all traffic on it until the vehicle has accomplished it's task. Do you agree this is the case?

Where did this come from? It would require a ground traffic control center with comprehensive knowledge of prevailing conditions such as weather, obstructions, construction, vehicles, etc., and override capabilities of traffic signals, variable speed limit signs, AMBER alert bulletin boards, etc. Considering the invasion of privacy that would be required for such, and the cost to implement, it would be neither desirable nor viable.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 396
Obscure Trivia:
Can you name the one vehicle that has the right of way over all other forms of traffic?
This right is never utilized or enforced.

_________________
History of the Condom
In 1272, the Muslim Arabs invented the condom, using a goat's lower intestine.
In 1873, the British somewhat refined the idea, by taking the intestine out of the goat first.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Leshani wrote:
Obscure Trivia:
Can you name the one vehicle that has the right of way over all other forms of traffic?
This right is never utilized or enforced.


Mail carrier?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:38 am 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Ostensibly, one objective of the interstate highway system, was to provide emergency landing space for aircraft.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:01 am 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Leshani wrote:
Obscure Trivia:
Can you name the one vehicle that has the right of way over all other forms of traffic?
This right is never utilized or enforced.


I know this is NOT the right answer... but my guess is an M1 Abrams Tank.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:26 am 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Rafael wrote:
Let me rephrase the question: how much should we yield to vehicles that require "emergency priority"?

Completely.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:28 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
FarSky wrote:
Rafael wrote:
Let me rephrase the question: how much should we yield to vehicles that require "emergency priority"?

Completely.


Define what you mean by this, please.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 179 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group