The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:40 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 382 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:28 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Uncle Fester wrote:
If a woman can choose to sever the link on her own, can a man sever a financial link then T?

I think this addresses that:
Talya wrote:
Honestly, i think a man should be able to absolve himself of that responsibility by advocating abortion (in a signed document provided to the mother) --and agreeing to help pay for it-- before a determined age of viability. If they both agree to have the child, they should both be forced to support it. If the mother elects to have it without the father's support, that's her choice. (Of course, if she doesn't inform the father of the pregnancy, the responsibility is also on her.)

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
Hopwin wrote:
I smell a giant elephant in the room and it's bothering me to no end. Talya, with all sympathy and my own baggage aside, have you had an abortion?


Talya wrote:
just as I personally find abortion distasteful and would never have one

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Stathol wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
If a woman can choose to sever the link on her own, can a man sever a financial link then T?

I think this addresses that:
Talya wrote:
Honestly, i think a man should be able to absolve himself of that responsibility by advocating abortion (in a signed document provided to the mother) --and agreeing to help pay for it-- before a determined age of viability. If they both agree to have the child, they should both be forced to support it. If the mother elects to have it without the father's support, that's her choice. (Of course, if she doesn't inform the father of the pregnancy, the responsibility is also on her.)



Missed that, Danke!

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Stathol wrote:
Talya wrote:
Yes, they should. And actually, I believe old-style vacuum abortions after viability should be treated the same way. Induced labor, however, should always be allowed. It's up to the fetus whether or not it can survive the outside world (with whatever medical help is available). The mother should not be forced to shelter it from such.

Ok; so in those cases, they should be charged with murder -- but why? They never entered into any parental agreement. They didn't actively deprive it of its life. They just abandoned it to fend for itself, and it failed. So rationally, why should they be charged with anything?


There is an accepted legal method for giving up a child that has already been born. Note that mothers who abandon newborns are generally not charged with murder. It's a type of negligence. In NY State I believe there is an offshoot of manslaughter called "Depraved indifference." When an easy and cost-free method exists to save a life, we have an obligation to take that method.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:47 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
I have not had an abortion.

I did once have an accidental miscarriage, and the emotional effects of it are likely what inspires my emotional dislike of abortion in general. I'll never know what Lachlan&Keira's big sister would have been like.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:52 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Talya wrote:

By medical definition, a fetus is actually a parasite, as the stipulation that it be a different type of organism is unstated.

Quote:
Parasite: An organism that lives in or on and takes its nourishment from another organism. A parasite cannot live independently.

http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art ... lekey=4769


Parasitism is a type of symbiotic relationship between organisms of different species where one organism, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the host.

Brief definitions tend to suck Taly. Also the label of parasite applies to the species. So any species that reproduces is parasitic to you.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:17 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Elmarnieh wrote:
Talya wrote:

By medical definition, a fetus is actually a parasite, as the stipulation that it be a different type of organism is unstated.

Quote:
Parasite: An organism that lives in or on and takes its nourishment from another organism. A parasite cannot live independently.

http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art ... lekey=4769


Parasitism is a type of symbiotic relationship between organisms of different species where one organism, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the host.

Brief definitions tend to suck Taly. Also the label of parasite applies to the species. So any species that reproduces is parasitic to you.


Semantics.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:32 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Müs wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:

Parasitism is a type of symbiotic relationship between organisms of different species where one organism, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the host.

Brief definitions tend to suck Taly. Also the label of parasite applies to the species. So any species that reproduces is parasitic to you.


Semantics.



Not an argument. Not a position. If you have a better way to communicate than via language please give it to us otherwise we require words to share common meaning in order to communicate effectively.

Until then **** or get off the pot.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
You can argue different definitions all day from different sources and count how many of them use the words "other species," I guess. Even Wikipedia has two slightly different statements:
Quote:
A parasite is an organism that lives on or inside another organism to the detriment of the host organism.
Quote:
Parasitism is a type of symbiotic relationship between organisms of different species where one organism, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the host.

Or maybe look up the etymology of parasite and see if it means what you think it means.

You really are just arguing semantics, though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:15 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
The mainstay of a poster in the discussion centers on the belief the fetus is a parasite - thus semantics about that are inherent in the discussion.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:30 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Would you be okay with saying parasite-like, or using the qualifier, "... like a parasite" instead? Then we're just making a reference to behavior, still conveying the same message, and avoiding a stupid **** argument.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:58 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Lenas wrote:
Would you be okay with saying parasite-like, or using the qualifier, "... like a parasite" instead? Then we're just making a reference to behavior, still conveying the same message, and avoiding a stupid **** argument.


It would be better but just slightly.

I don't ever recall seeing any parasite look after its host in old age after it detached from the host which occurs quite often with the children of human parents.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:04 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
I'd say that's more of a morality-based decision, and not an instinctual one.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Elmarnieh wrote:
Lenas wrote:
Would you be okay with saying parasite-like, or using the qualifier, "... like a parasite" instead? Then we're just making a reference to behavior, still conveying the same message, and avoiding a stupid **** argument.


It would be better but just slightly.

I don't ever recall seeing any parasite look after its host in old age after it detached from the host which occurs quite often with the children of human parents.


At that point no one is contesting whether its a parasite. I agree with you that it isn't a parasite, but you're trying to bring in facts that have nothing to do with whether its a parasite or not.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Lenas wrote:
I'd say that's more of a morality-based decision, and not an instinctual one.


Are you aware that our brains are developed from very similar processes that form animal brains? Maybe our "morality-based decisions" are just sophisticated instinct. At what point does an animal-like ancestor of humans caring for its parent stop being instinct and start being morality?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:11 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
To be honest, at this point, it looks like it's been pretty much conceded that it's not a parasite, as defined, just being characterized as such. Elmo's bringing in facts that dispute that characterization.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Last edited by Vindicarre on Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:11 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Lenas wrote:
I'd say that's more of a morality-based decision, and not an instinctual one.


I only know of two cultures in human history that deviate from this. My knowledge of course is not perfect however it can be easily argued that such a thing is evident in over 90% of the existing human population. Is family bonding that different from the pack instinct?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:14 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Diamondeye wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
Lenas wrote:
Would you be okay with saying parasite-like, or using the qualifier, "... like a parasite" instead? Then we're just making a reference to behavior, still conveying the same message, and avoiding a stupid **** argument.


It would be better but just slightly.

I don't ever recall seeing any parasite look after its host in old age after it detached from the host which occurs quite often with the children of human parents.


At that point no one is contesting whether its a parasite. I agree with you that it isn't a parasite, but you're trying to bring in facts that have nothing to do with whether its a parasite or not.



Except that things are defined as a parasite by a species. Unless we argue that all humans are parasitic (which is moot so that could be another thread) and then since anything that reproduces expends energy and thus risks its own health to reproduce - which of course then every living thing is parasitic rendering the word meaningless. So yeah its still an important factor to consider.

Cows - not parasites
Tapeworms - parasites

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:15 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Elmarnieh wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
At that point no one is contesting whether its a parasite. I agree with you that it isn't a parasite, but you're trying to bring in facts that have nothing to do with whether its a parasite or not.



Except that things are defined as a parasite by a species. Unless we argue that all humans are parasitic (which is moot so that could be another thread) and then since anything that reproduces expends energy and thus risks its own health to reproduce - which of course then every living thing is parasitic rendering the word meaningless. So yeah its still an important factor to consider.

Cows - not parasites
Tapeworms - parasites


I don't disagree with this line of reasoning. That, however, has ntohing to do with whether a parasite can care for its host in old age. Stick with the species line of reasoning, it's much better.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Really the problem is when a mature parasite (the man) comes in line of sight of the woman (the host). The parasite then first attacks her mind, eventually manipulating her to allow tiny parasites to enter her body. One takes root and uses her as a host.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Or, one could say:
Really the problem is when a mature parasite (the woman) comes in line of sight of the host (the man) she desires. The parasite then first attacks his mind, eventually manipulating him to deposit tiny gametes into her body. One takes root and the pair use him as a host.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:41 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
I have a feeling from now on its going to be self mocking our species.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Also it's a little hypocritical to call something inside of you a "parasite", which has strong negative connotations, when you yourself were once in that same role.

It's like a rich black person, who was once poor, saying "yea you have the choice to go lynch those poor niggers, after all they're just niggers. And poor so nobody really cares." Ok maybe I got carried away. :P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:56 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Nothing wrong with calling a spade a spade.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:06 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
No but certainly it is incorrect to call a fetus of any species a parasite to its parent.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 382 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 311 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group