Elmarnieh wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Have you got any actual evidence that the allegations are fabricated or the result of financial inducement? Not evidence that he is innocent, but evidence that she is purposefully making a false accusation.
I think the more important question is what evidence do you have that the allegations are true?
You know the person bringing the claim (the one with the allegations) has to prove it. Not the other way around that is so common in rape allegations - which make it a perfect allegation to discredit someone.
[/quote]
We don't know yet. I only claimed he was
charged with rape, and that people who like this guy would instantly claim that the charge was convenient and blah blah blah. Furthermore, he was charged by a
Swedish court, and Sweden is not an ally of the United States even if it's a generally friendly country. It's definiely not sympathetic to us in regard to the sort of matters the leaked information pertains to.
In any case, I don't care that you think the more important question is whether the allegations are true; this "I think the more important question" business is just a distraction fromt he fact that you have
no evidence she is lying. By claiming (or in this case just "wondering" as a way to make the allegation without actually stating it directly) that the allegations are convenient or that the girl did it for financial gain, you're making an accusation as well - namely one of making a false report of a crime.
Innocent until proven guilty does not mean you can accuse the accuser of purposefully lying and then avoid supplying evidence. SAying you do not believe he is guilty is one thing, saying that the accuser does not actually beleive she was raped and is doing it for some ulterior purpose is quite another - and gives you a burden of proof.