The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:07 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 253 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:50 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Talya wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
No more than such exist for parents of born children now in that they cannot place the child in undo harm or neglect. That isn't what we are talking about though if you want to get schooled in another thread by all means open one.


Parents who feed a child a steady diet of junk food, get them drunk, stoned or have them smoke cigarettes are going to be in big legal trouble.

So do you believe a pregnant mother should be legally forced to stop drinking, smoking, or eating poorly?


First off allowing underage children to smoke is not a crime - only selling to minors is.

That said, no a pregnant mother can do all of that (but should not). The issue is if it occurs at such a frequency to be considered negligent. Nowhere did I even allude to something as a total ban on behaviors which are rather normal in the course of adult life.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Last edited by Elmarnieh on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:51 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Müs wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion about my beliefs however the fact that a fetus is a distinct organism from the mother is not a belief - it is a fact.


Fine, take it out. If it lives, it lives.



Can I suggest the same treatment to those I don't like in regards to their normal and natural environment? For example could I morally argue that we should disturb the natural course of events and forcibly remove this atmosphere from you and see if you survive?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:52 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Talya wrote:
I'd actually be less opposed to (although still not in favor of) more restrictions on abortion if the following were true:

(1) mandatory sex ed in public educaction included exhaustive information on safe sex and family planning, and (2) emergency contraceptives were available without a prescription over the counter EVERYWHERE (like, the corner store included.)

All things being equal, it should take some colossal idiocy to have an unwanted pregnancy. All things, however, are not equal.

I'd rather sexual mechanics be taught in the home but I'm fairly with you on the rest of this.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:53 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Elmarnieh wrote:
First off allowing underage children to drink is not a crime - only selling to minors is.


WRONG.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,276178,00.html

Quote:
That said, no a pregnant mother can do all of that (but should not). The issue is if it occurs at such a frequency to be considered negligent. Nowhere did I even allude to something as a total ban on behaviors which are rather normal in the course of adult life.


This position is not logically consistent with your position on abortion. A parent who is found to give their children pot, or even cigarrettes, or even a steady diet of potato chips, is going to be charged with a crime that will vary from state to state and have their child taken away from them. If you believe the pregnant woman has the same obligation to an unborn fetus that a parent has to a child, then you need to apply the same restrictions to both.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Last edited by Talya on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:54 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Elmarnieh wrote:
Müs wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion about my beliefs however the fact that a fetus is a distinct organism from the mother is not a belief - it is a fact.


Fine, take it out. If it lives, it lives.



Can I suggest the same treatment to those I don't like in regards to their normal and natural environment? For example could I morally argue that we should disturb the natural course of events and forcibly remove this atmosphere from you and see if you survive?


No. That's not what I am arguing.

You said a fetus is a distinct organism from the mother. Therefore, it should be able to be removed from the mother and survive. If it cannot, it is not a distinct organism.

So which is it?

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:56 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Müs wrote:

Does their 3 month old daughter require heroic medical measures to survive?


Not at all. She needs to just be given food and taken care of...you know, kind of what what a woman needs to do when it's still inside her..non of which seem to be very heroic.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:56 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Rorinthas wrote:
I'd rather sexual mechanics be taught in the home but I'm fairly with you on the rest of this.


I would, too. However, since so many parents neglect going into this much detail, thinking that the less they tell their children, the less likely they are to have sex, it's not really going to happen.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Rorinthas wrote:
Anti abortion people will probably raise up more of the next generation by virtue of having more children. Assuming those parents accurately teach their children the values behind their position a larger amount of the future electorate will be pro life.

abortion as choice people will presumably leave their children largely to choose for themselves. If trends are an indicator a majority /large group of them will become anti abortion.


And that is why they will win. Amusingly in US politics the Democrats should be the most anti abortion group out there, as they are loosing their future voters.

As for those who view fetus's as parasites, can we take it one step further and view the very disabled, criminal, non self sustaining elderly as parasites on the body of society?

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:07 pm 
Offline
Consummate Professional
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:23 am
Posts: 920
Location: The battlefield. As always.
Clearly humans should be laying eggs instead of doing internal development.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:08 pm 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
Damn you mammalian evolutionary path!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:11 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Uncle Fester wrote:
As for those who view fetus's as parasites, can we take it one step further and view the very disabled, criminal, non self sustaining elderly as parasites on the body of society?


The wonderful irony here is that unless you support social security, public health care, welfare, and numerous other social programs required for some of these people to survive, that is exactly how you view those people.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
What about abortion in the case of ovagenesis, Elmo?

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:21 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Micheal wrote:
Hannibal wrote:
Michael- so I assume you think no penalty should be levied?


Putting words in my mouth Hannibal? Where have I commented in this thread before this?


D'oh, sorry had two threads open and got corn-fused.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Dalantia wrote:
Clearly humans should be laying eggs instead of doing internal development.


Then we'd just be debating whether or not it should be a crime to leave the eggs unincubated, or eat an omelette.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Unless, of course, you double stamp it with no erasies.

And that really would be the end of it, because everyone knows you can't triple stamp a double stamp.


I was wondering if someone was going to dunk that.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:24 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Talya wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
As for those who view fetus's as parasites, can we take it one step further and view the very disabled, criminal, non self sustaining elderly as parasites on the body of society?


The wonderful irony here is that unless you support social security, public health care, welfare, and numerous other social programs required for some of these people to survive, that is exactly how you view those people.



that is why I bring it up, I am amused as people who support one and not the other. I normally stay out of the abortion threads mostly due to this reason.

My views on abortion are contradictory and probably illogical, perhaps sociopath, so I mostly stay to the side and snark.

I believe, as Elm does, that abortion is murder, the problem is I do not like most people and that what makes less of them, especially the poor who tend to have abortions, is a better thing.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:25 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Uncle Fester wrote:
that is why I bring it up, I am amused as people who support one and not the other.


You and I would get along just fine.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:26 pm 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Then we'd just be debating whether or not it should be a crime to leave the eggs unincubated, or eat an omelette.


Coming up after the break, the abortion debate rages on: Should you eat your unborn young scrambled, or sunny side up? Stay tuned!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Uncle Fester wrote:
Talya wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
As for those who view fetus's as parasites, can we take it one step further and view the very disabled, criminal, non self sustaining elderly as parasites on the body of society?


The wonderful irony here is that unless you support social security, public health care, welfare, and numerous other social programs required for some of these people to survive, that is exactly how you view those people.



that is why I bring it up, I am amused as people who support one and not the other. I normally stay out of the abortion threads mostly due to this reason.

My views on abortion are contradictory and probably illogical, perhaps sociopath, so I mostly stay to the side and snark.

I believe, as Elm does, that abortion is murder, the problem is I do not like most people and that what makes less of them, especially the poor who tend to have abortions, is a better thing.


I heard one consistent argument that was pro-life, anti disabled people. A child has the potential to grow into a productive citizen. Those who do not have this potential should not be given support.

It was pretty sick IMO.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:34 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Talya wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
that is why I bring it up, I am amused as people who support one and not the other.


You and I would get along just fine.



As I have skipped most of the abortion threads here, I am unsure of your position, so bear with me a moment if I ask for a repeat (probably in a biased and leading way) You are pro abortion and the cutting of the "safety net", to borrow the term for all the programs that support those that can not?


Most of my anger as society is now coming from my sister who is going for her masters in social work, from learning about the defectives she tries to help. I lake any better term from these people who seem only to exist to reproduce and drain resources of others with no production or positive contribution themselves, I am halfway to being a eugenicists and wanting them sterilized. (the Libertarian in me would rather they just be left to their own success or failure in a more organic Darwinian perspective)

As for getting along, who knows until you actually meet some one in person. What part of Canada do you live in? My wife has friends in Toronto and Vancouver and wants to go visit them, so perhaps one day we can talk in person.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:38 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Dalantia wrote:
Clearly humans should be laying eggs instead of doing internal development.


Then we'd just be debating whether or not it should be a crime to leave the eggs unincubated, or eat an omelette.

Nah at least that way someone else who can't lay eggs would be able and willing to take care of it. Clearly we need to invent embryonic extraction and an artificial womb. That would solve the debate.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:38 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Talya wrote:
The wonderful irony here is that unless you support social security, public health care, welfare, and numerous other social programs required for some of these people to survive, that is exactly how you view those people.


Um, no. The design of these programs was not to be survival tools, but a helping hand when a rough patch was hit, or in the case of social security- benefits to a widow. It's not a retirement plan. Welfare was supposed to be temp assistance, not a lifestyle for generations.

Talya wrote:
A parent who is found to give their children pot, or even cigarrettes, or even a steady diet of potato chips, is going to be charged with a crime that will vary from state to state and have their child taken away from them. If you believe the pregnant woman has the same obligation to an unborn fetus that a parent has to a child, then you need to apply the same restrictions to both.


I agree, I want consistancy in laws. If a guy kills a 6month pregnant chick, he shouldn't get slapped with double homicide- yet it's happened. But if we are saying that at 6month and 1 day it's a human being, then why don't we currently charge unhealthy moms, or pregnant women who engage in risky behaviors such as smoking drinking etc with at least child endangerment?

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:43 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Uncle Fester wrote:
As I have skipped most of the abortion threads here, I am unsure of your position, so bear with me a moment if I ask for a repeat (probably in a biased and leading way) You are pro abortion and the cutting of the "safety net", to borrow the term for all the programs that support those that can not?


I am "pro-choice." Personally, I'm anti-abortion. I am in favor of severely cutting/curtailing much of the "safety net." I think there's a place for some of it (not out of altruism, but because it's good for the economy and therefore helps everyone equally -- like Unemployment Insurance), but I think in general we give far too many handouts to unproductive parts of society.

Quote:
As for getting along, who knows until you actually meet some one in person. What part of Canada do you live in? My wife has friends in Toronto and Vancouver and wants to go visit them, so perhaps one day we can talk in person.


North of Toronto a fair ways. Noplace anybody ever goes on vacation...

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:44 pm 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
Lex Luthor wrote:
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Lex Luthor wrote:
Something that sucks nutrients from you internally, shares a lot of your DNA, and has no independence is arguably part of your body.

So, a tapeworm is part of your body?


Tapeworms don't share DNA, they entered externally, and can be removed and survive.

A fetus doesn't share DNA, it inherited DNA. It doesn't continue to receive DNA from the mother. The embryo synthesizes its own DNA. I don't really understand what bearing this has on the argument anyway though.

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Mookhow wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Then we'd just be debating whether or not it should be a crime to leave the eggs unincubated, or eat an omelette.


Coming up after the break, the abortion debate rages on: Should you eat your unborn young scrambled, or sunny side up? Stay tuned!


Definately scrambled.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 253 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 290 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group