The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:41 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:52 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Monte wrote:
I call them undocumented, because I refuse to call them "Alien" and help to dehumanize them, nor do I believe a person can be illegal. People can commit illegal acts, but that does not make them illegal as individuals.


Really? What do you call a spade? A "Wooden-handled earthen excavationary device"?

The correct term for their status is "Illegal Alien" If they entered legally, they would be "Legal Aliens". The name of the card that shows legal status is "Alien Registration Card". They would fill out an "Immigrant Visa and Alien Registration" form to get one of these cards...

So yes, they are indeed Illegal Aliens. This is the correct and proper term.

The people themselves are not illegal. Their continued residence inside a country to which they have not legally emigrated is. Think of it as trespassing on a federal level. You go into someone else's house and live there, and work there in direct contravention of their desire that you leave. And then ***** that they're not stocking the fridge with food you like. I don't care that they want to come here. Just do it in the correct, legal manner. Allow me to welcome you into my house so to speak.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:27 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
If they are not illegal aliens then I am not a murderer, I am a non law sanctioned, independent entropy assistant.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Monte wrote:
I disagree. They committed a crime in coming here. However, they are not continually committing a crime every day they stay. A crime is an act. If I rob a bank, I am not comitting a new robbery every day I hang on to the money. People are not illegal. Actions are.

Okay. So I'll call them non-citizen felons, if that makes you feel better. See, felons are people who have committed a felony.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:49 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
Monte wrote:
I disagree. They committed a crime in coming here. However, they are not continually committing a crime every day they stay. A crime is an act. If I rob a bank, I am not comitting a new robbery every day I hang on to the money. People are not illegal. Actions are.


Undocumented? I guess that is the tissue to the nose to stop the stench of accuracy. They don't have documents because they entered the country illegally. It isn't because the documents are back at the apartment or over at grandmas. They have no documents that state they entered the country legally because they broke the law and came here illegally. The action of remaining in the country without having entered legally is a crime. If it isn't, why are they deported when they are found out? Their presence in the country is a continuing crime, Monte. The action of staying here, working here, or collecting benefits here, these are the actions you are referring to, the actions that make their continued presence a crime.

Think of it as trespassing or squatting. Both of those are crimes, it isn't the initial access to the property alone, it is the continued presence.The first crime is the illegal entry. They don't get to pay a fine for that and stay. They get caught, they get deported.

Due to the tough economic times, these days there are American citizens willing to do the work the 'guest workers' were risking their lives to get.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:31 am 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Monte wrote:
I call them undocumented, because I refuse to call them "Alien" and help to dehumanize them...



Yet "birther", and "teabagger" are great descriptives that don't dehumanize at all. :roll:

Alinsky would be proud.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:17 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
None of those terms "dehumanizes" anyone. "Dehumanizing" requires a lot more than just a term. It's a form of "otherization", as Khross says, but the difference is that "Illegal Alien" is a form of othering based on perfectly valid legal status. They're supposed to be otherized because they are committing a crime. Calling people "inmates" or "convicts" otherizes as well, and for perfectly good reason.

Calling them "undocumented" is simply an attempt to gloss over their illegal activity. It doesn't otherize them any less. It's just masking an agenda as a concern that the not be "dehumanized", which is silly. It's not like anyone is going to think they're wookies because of the term Illegal Alien.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Last edited by Diamondeye on Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:29 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Undocumented doesn't even buy any additional leeway. I still don't have my motorcycle liscense. If I got pulled over, should I tell the officer "No, it's not that I don't have a liscense, it's that I'm an undocumented driver. So I'm not doing anything illegal."

Lack of possession of documentation is illegal.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Müs wrote:
Really? What do you call a spade? A "Wooden-handled earthen excavationary device"?

Fiberglass hater!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:17 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Vindicarre wrote:
Monte wrote:
I call them undocumented, because I refuse to call them "Alien" and help to dehumanize them...



Yet "birther", and "teabagger" are great descriptives that don't dehumanize at all. :roll:

Alinsky would be proud.



Good call.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:38 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
No wonder a lot of us have been lumped into the same catagory, since we all seem to pick up on the same wrongs when they are posted.... must be a conspiricy!

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Different people are offended by different things, for different reasons. That doesn't invalidate the offense.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:42 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
What the heck is "validating" or "invalidating" the offense?

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Some people are very quick to howl about how other people shouldn't be offended. People have every right to be offended and express themselves as a result, at whatever they happen to be offended by.

In other words, if people are offended by the use of the word "teabagger" to describe the screamers at town hall meetings, they should say so. I happen to find this costume offensive for the reasons I laid out above.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:05 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Monte wrote:
Some people are very quick to howl about how other people shouldn't be offended. People have every right to be offended and express themselves as a result, at whatever they happen to be offended by.

In other words, if people are offended by the use of the word "teabagger" to describe the screamers at town hall meetings, they should say so. I happen to find this costume offensive for the reasons I laid out above.


That's all true, but so what?

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Exactly.

Someone brought up the thread, I explained why I found it offensive, and suddenly it was pandemonium, lol.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:46 am 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Monte wrote:
I disagree. They committed a crime in coming here. However, they are not continually committing a crime every day they stay. A crime is an act. If I rob a bank, I am not comitting a new robbery every day I hang on to the money.

That isn't correct at all. Possession of stolen property is criminal. So is possession of controlled substances.

You are correct that acts are criminal, not people. However, residence is an act, any way you define it. Just because it's a continuous, ongoing action rather than a discrete moment in time doesn't make it any less an act. Unless, of course, you want to argue that, say, jogging and breathing are not acts.

If we want to be totally correct, perhaps the term should be "illegally immigrated aliens" or "illegally resident aliens", but that's really just arguing semantics. I think the real heart of the matter is that -- legalities aside -- you don't think people are actually doing anything wrong by immigrating illegally to and continuing to reside illegally within the United States. Others disagree. I posit for your consideration that you may not actually be so much offended by the semantics of the "illegal alien" label as you are by the suggestion that illegal residence is bad.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
But you wouldn't refer to someone who had stolen property as an "illegal posessor". Residence is not an act. It's a state of being. I live in this place.

Alien is a term I also object to. It dehumanizes them. "Others" them, if you will. They aren't human. They're alien. Foreign. Different. Not us.

They are people. Frankly, they're people that were here a heck of a long time before we took their land. The vast majority of them are hard working people looking to make a dream.

Quick survey - how many of you exceeded the speed limit today on your way to work? By how much? How about over the weekend? How many of you downloaded something for free you should have paid for?

The fact is, all of us break laws. You don't go around calling someone who habitually drives 5 over the speed limit an "Illegal Driver". You don't call someone that smokes pot an "illegal smoker".

You don't call someone currently engaged in sex while under the age of consent an "illegal ****".

But for some reason, crossing the border illegally is this ginormous horror that makes a person not only illegal 100% of the time, but also something less than human.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:39 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Monte wrote:
But you wouldn't refer to someone who had stolen property as an "illegal posessor". Residence is not an act. It's a state of being. I live in this place.


Someone who has stolen property is a goddamn thief.
Monte wrote:
Alien is a term I also object to. It dehumanizes them. "Others" them, if you will. They aren't human. They're alien. Foreign. Different. Not us.


Yes. They are foreign and different. The term 'alien' is perfectly usable for this, and has been for hundreds of years. Hell, my mom was an alien.

Monte wrote:
Quick survey - how many of you exceeded the speed limit today on your way to work? By how much? How about over the weekend? How many of you downloaded something for free you should have paid for?

The fact is, all of us break laws. You don't go around calling someone who habitually drives 5 over the speed limit an "Illegal Driver". You don't call someone that smokes pot an "illegal smoker".


Tu Quoque fallacy :p

Monte wrote:
You don't call someone currently engaged in sex while under the age of consent an "illegal ****".


No, they're rapists. Statutory Rapists. Although, I *much* prefer the term 'illegal ****'

Monte wrote:
But for some reason, crossing the border illegally is this ginormous horror that makes a person not only illegal 100% of the time, but also something less than human.


No. It makes them criminals. On par with thieves and trespassers and drug traffickers. Not as bad as rapists and murderers and liberals.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:41 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Monte wrote:
But you wouldn't refer to someone who had stolen property as an "illegal posessor".
You'd refer to them as a thief, though. So that's really not helping your case.

Monte wrote:
Residence is not an act. It's a state of being. I live in this place.

Orly?
The OED wrote:
1. a. to have (hold, keep, or make) one's residence, to have one's usual dwelling-place or abode; to reside. to take up one's residence, to establish oneself; to settle.

Every one of those phrases is an infinitive. A verb. An action. You can say that it isn't an act all you want, but the English language doesn't agree with you.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Mus - you honestly believe that a man who, having no opportunity to feed his family and lacking the means to enter this country legally, comes here illegally and gets a job, works hard to feed them, is the moral equivalent of say, a heroin dealer?

Really?

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:53 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Monte wrote:
But you wouldn't refer to someone who had stolen property as an "illegal posessor". Residence is not an act. It's a state of being. I live in this place.

Alien is a term I also object to. It dehumanizes them. "Others" them, if you will. They aren't human. They're alien. Foreign. Different. Not us.

They are people. Frankly, they're people that were here a heck of a long time before we took their land. The vast majority of them are hard working people looking to make a dream.

Quick survey - how many of you exceeded the speed limit today on your way to work? By how much? How about over the weekend? How many of you downloaded something for free you should have paid for?

The fact is, all of us break laws. You don't go around calling someone who habitually drives 5 over the speed limit an "Illegal Driver". You don't call someone that smokes pot an "illegal smoker".

You don't call someone currently engaged in sex while under the age of consent an "illegal ****".

But for some reason, crossing the border illegally is this ginormous horror that makes a person not only illegal 100% of the time, but also something less than human.


I feel your entire post has nothing to do with the issue at hand. However I'll play.

-Someone who is is possession of stolen property depending on the $ amount can be facing a felony. Federal time if it's from another state. So the entire time they are in possession of stolen property they are in a continuining state of being wrong. What you call it is irrelevent.

-Can I take up residence in your home? By the logic you've put forth, the next step should be repealing all tresspassing laws. How about I camp in your living room, use your heat, electric, gas and bathroom, and send a majority of my money back to my country. Feel free to send me whatever you feel is an acceptable subsidy for my illegal behavior.

-What shall we call these "aliens" then, shall we call them foregin invaders? International tresspassers? You can call them Strawberry Shortcake for all I care, but the laws need to be enforced.

-The United States has not taken land from Mexico in any lifetime of a person alive today. Your assertion that the citizens of the US "owe" them is utter and complete BS. Put the blame where it is due. I didn't take their land. I also never owned Slaves, wore an SS uniform, or killed an endangered species. If your social conscience feels you "owe" a demographic for some percieved wrong, feel free to open up your own F'ing wallet and pay them directly. Stop forcing others to fund your feel good social bs.

-Yes we all break laws. There are so many convuleted state and federal laws that it is inevitable that we break any number of them in our day to day activities. Thats also like saying water is wet. Not exactly a revelation thats going to change, prove or justify a damned thing. If your habitual speeder keeps getting caught- guess what, the penalties get upped all the way to a felony. And no, there isn't a legal wiggle room, unless the officer decides there is.

-As to your underaged "example" for whatever reason you included it, without the rest of the equation you can't decide the status of those involved. It could be two kids having fun, or it could be a 40 something adult predator banging a kid. However, if you are not a citizen of the US, and you are here without the proper documentation, you are in fact commiting a crime and are an illegal alien. No matter how much you object to an adjective, the facts will remain the same.

-Lets be honest, it is, tho less dramatic then you are describing it. How about we adopt NK's policy towards illegal immigration? Face it, the US tolerates illegal immigrants far more than any other country. Why doesn't the illegal immigration (rofl) lobby decry the policies of other countries or point to them as success stories?

We have laws to come to this country. If they are not followed, then everyone involved with the illegal entry as well as harboring the felons need to be held accountable for the crime. The very reason we have so many illegal aliens here is that we are very lax on enforcement.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:56 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Monte wrote:
You don't call someone currently engaged in sex while under the age of consent an "illegal ****".

Well, provided it's not rape, he entered the, ah, country with consent of the governing body.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
I feel the laws in place regarding immigration are unjust. I have little problem with breaking an unjust law. Back in the day, it was illegal for a white man to marry a black woman. The *law* was unjust.

Did you speed today? Are you a bad or illegal person because you did? Did you speed yesterday? Have you ever smoked pot? Have you ever violated a law?

If so, then why do you think you have the right to judge these people?

Perhaps you don't feel that way, but using terms like "illegal alien" clearly implies a level of judgement.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
The we need to have the debate to change the law. The right draft would likely get my support. Immigration laws -are- broken, but so are a lot of laws but that doesn't give me liberty to break them. We don't get to pick and choose.

Yes I've broken the law, I also got punished for it when caught.

Really we need to go after the employers to be honest. No employers breaking the hiring law= no jobs = no (or at least significantly less) illegal (is immigrant an acceptable term?).

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Last edited by Rorinthas on Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:01 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Monte wrote:
Mus - you honestly believe that a man who, having no opportunity to feed his family and lacking the means to enter this country legally, comes here illegally and gets a job, works hard to feed them, is the moral equivalent of say, a heroin dealer?

Really?


Yes. Probably even more so. The illegal alien is taking services and resources for himself and his family without paying for them. At least the heroin dealer is only hurting those that want to be hurt.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 161 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group