Xequecal wrote:
No, I just don't like the idea of arbitrary segregation based on who won the geographic lottery.
Predjudicial language. There is nothing "Arbitrary" about it, nor is it a "geographic lottery".
Quote:
Illegal immigrants with jobs contribute more to the country than the millions of Americans who refuse to work, while consuming far less entitlements than they do.
A) Show evidence
B) Illegal immigrants do not "contribute"; they take away by reducing the number of available jobs, and the value of those jobs.
Quote:
(I'm not 100% clear on exactly what entitlements illegals can receive and which ones they can't, but it's definitely less than full citizens)
In other words, you don't know at all, you're just assuming because you want it to be that way.
Quote:
In addition, I have serious doubts that Americans would ever be willing to perform the work the illegals currently do, and that if the illegals were ousted the farm production would just be moved offshore somewhere where labor is cheaper, which would not be much better for the economy.
It "would just" be moved offshore? Where? Land is where it is and is suitable for the crops it is suitable for. We provide an immense amount of the world's agriculture. What makes you thinkt hat countries that can't farm well now, or which aren't big enough to match our volume will suddenly be able to? Your doubts are based entirely on your desire for the problem to be unsolveable.
Quote:
The illegal immigrant problem isn't insurmountable but IMHO the amount it would cost to solve it significantly outweighs the benefits.
And your opinion is based entirely on this idea that U.S. national soveriegnty is some sort of "geograpgic lottery". It's amazing how only the U.S. is expected to let whoever damn well pleases come in.