The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:47 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Right, none of us know what it's like to be in that situation. It's like none of us have ever been around dogs before. Just like none of us know what it's like to have to keep order in a school classroom, even though a large number of people on this board are former Boy Scout members.

That police officer wasn't in any situation that half of this board hasn't found themselves in before. He had a dog charging at him. It's not like dogs are strange and unusual beasts.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Corolinth wrote:
Right, none of us know what it's like to be in that situation. It's like none of us have ever been around dogs before. Just like none of us know what it's like to have to keep order in a school classroom, even though a large number of people on this board are former Boy Scout members.

That police officer wasn't in any situation that half of this board hasn't found themselves in before. He had a dog charging at him. It's not like dogs are strange and unusual beasts.

You ever been attacked by a large dog while carrying a gun?

If you didn't use it, you've given up your best chance at protecting yourself and allowed an animal to establish a dangerous behavior pattern.

There's a reason many states only give a dog "one free bite".

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:55 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Can't agree with the "out of nowhere" and the "being attacked". Yes I've been charged by a what you consider a "large" dog (American Pit Bull Terrier) while carrying. I held it down by its neck until it's owner claimed it.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Taskiss wrote:
There's a reason many states only give a dog "one free bite".

There are three reasons, actually - (1) many people overestimate the danger dogs pose, (2) many people undervalue the life of a dog, and (3):
Spoiler:

:P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:01 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
I suppose to we need to define small, medium, and large dogs ...

Cause, honestly, Moose is the only "large" dog I own, and he's a bit of an aberration :P

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:02 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Calling Arafys an 'aberration' seems unnecessarily hurtful. :P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:05 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Yup, Khross, my dog's 85-90 pounds and he's medium. In my estimation, my brother's Newfoundlands are large.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:06 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
FarSky wrote:
Calling Arafys an 'aberration' seems unnecessarily hurtful. :P
Well, complete aside and a funny story ...

So, I acquired from Plastic Bag On the Interstate Dog Vendors (that is, I witnessed him getting chucked from the window of a moving vehicle onto the shoulder) this tiny (as in maybe 4 lbs) Pit Bull Terrier puppy. And he was obviously the runt of his litter. So I took him to the vet and never really go around to finding him another home.

As for being an aberration, he weighs 133 lbs and is not obese.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:07 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
:shock:

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:07 pm 
Offline
Lucky Bastard
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:11 am
Posts: 2341
Coro:

Though I have been around dogs and many here also have been around dogs, I would like to know how many have actually had a large dog charging at them with intent to harm.

I don't believe that you think that just because someone has been around dogs necessarily knows what to do if they were being attacked. That is truly a stupid statement. Kindergartners and First graders have been around their family dogs, surely they would know how to handle an attacking pitbull that likely weighs twice their own weight, right?

Back in high school, I was walking to the school bus stop. I was walking on the sidewalk in front of a neighbor's house. Their little annoying yap-dog came running out to me growling and snarling as those annoying type of dogs are wont to do. Though I was not fearful for my life, I faced him to make sure he wasn't going to bite me. He seemed to calm down and I turned and continued walking. No sooner than I turned my back, the little bastard bit me on my leg.

Dogs are animals. You can't reason with an attacking dog, especially one that isn't yours. Are we advocating that officers turn their backs and run/retreat from attacking dogs now? Perhaps they should be carrying some other dog deterrant so the dog did not need to be shot. But asking anyone to turn from an attacking dog is just plain stupid.

_________________
This must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:09 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Yeah, that's why I call him Moose. He's a bit of a challenge sometimes, but that's mostly a factor of his size. And because he's too big for his breed, he has hip and knee problems. Still, I love the Moose and take good care of him. His favorite day of the week is Saturday, as evidenced by the fact that if I sleep in, he will drag the stone cart from the shed and into the kitchen.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Last edited by Khross on Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:09 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
As I said before, Foamy, no one is advocating the officer run. Whether the dog was attacking is a matter of opinion, and I believe the body language of that dog doesn't show that it was.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Vindicarre wrote:
As I said before, Foamy, no one is advocating the officer run. Whether the dog was attacking is a matter of opinion, and I believe the body language of that dog doesn't show that it was.

I take it you consider yourself somewhat experienced with dogs, seeing's how you can read their body language...

How would you rate yourself? More experienced than average?

Now, how experienced do you KNOW that particular cop is?

You expect too much, sir. I'd not even consider the average person capable of reading a dog's body language well enough to ascertain their intent to attack or not.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:24 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
I wasn't commenting on the officer's level of experience. My comment is directed towards those that repeatedly make the claim that the dog was "attacking". They are making claims that aren't backed up by what is contained in the video.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:27 pm 
Offline
Lucky Bastard
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:11 am
Posts: 2341
One might imply from the video that if the officer felt the need to ready, then draw and fire his weapon, that there was indeed an element of danger.

I don't imagine the dog was running up to him to give him a big, wet, sloppy kiss.

Nothing about intent, whether on the part of the officer, the homeowner, or the dog can clearly be surmised from the video and it is ridiculous that anyone tries to do so.

_________________
This must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Vindicarre wrote:
I wasn't commenting on the officer's level of experience. My comment is directed towards those that repeatedly make the claim that the dog was "attacking". They are making claims that aren't backed up by what is contained in the video.

Your statements indicate to me you are above average in your experience with dogs.

You're not qualified to speak to what the average person would think, were the average person put in that position. You can't "un-know" what you know and it absolutely biases your opinion.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Foamy wrote:
One might imply from the video that if the officer felt the need to ready, then draw and fire his weapon, that there was indeed an element of danger.
Don't forget, he was retreating, too. His actions weren't aggressive, he was backing away from the animal.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Foamy wrote:
I don't imagine the dog was running up to him to give him a big, wet, sloppy kiss.


Why not? You can't possibly know that he wasn't. I wouldn't consider it abnormal behavior for a dog to run out greet a visitor, with no other intention than to get some attention and see what kind of treats they might have in their pockets...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Taskiss & Foamy - Let's say the dog was actually attacking. Given that assumption, what level of danger do you guys think such an attack would likely pose to the cop? Would his life likely be at risk? Would a serious, major-trauma mauling be probable? Was the likely outcome a couple of bites requiring a few stitches and a tetanus shot? And so on. The likely outcome of the attack, if one were to occur, is a crucial point for me.

*Edit: Rephrasing to reflect Vind's comment (which I agree with) that "mortal danger" is too high a bar.


Last edited by RangerDave on Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:37 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Foamy, The only intent that can be absolutely surmised from the video is that the officer intended to shoot the dog. I maintain that the dog wasn't attacking, merely charging, based on the dog's body language. Why others would make the assumption that the dog was attacking, I don't know.

Taskiss, I don't believe I've made any statements dealing with what other people (average or otherwise) "would think", have I? My statements are directed at those who "have stated" that the dog was attacking; I disagree.

RD, I don't believe the officer should have to wait until he was in "mortal danger" to use lethal force, that's too high a bar.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Last edited by Vindicarre on Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:37 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Khross wrote:
I suppose to we need to define small, medium, and large dogs ...

Cause, honestly, Moose is the only "large" dog I own, and he's a bit of an aberration :P

There is only one true way to define a large/medium/small dog and it is relative to the person obviously.

Is it's ****: Smaller than yours? About the same size? Bigger than yours?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:47 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
That's a bad metric. It makes my beagle a large dog, and that's using Screeling's poo as a baseline for comparison.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Vindicarre wrote:
Taskiss, I don't believe I've made any statements dealing with what other people (average or otherwise) "would think", have I? My statements are directed at those who "have stated" that the dog was attacking; I disagree.


Vindicarre wrote:
He wasn't being attacked, he was being charged. The difference is massive. That dog showed the wrong body language for an attacking dog. No one is advocating turning and running. What is being advocated is that the level of force used was in excess of what many believe was necessary.

The determination your argument supports is advocating that the level of force used was excessive. You don't need to make that argument yourself, that's not necessary.

Your argument is made using opinions shaped by an experience level greater than average. Supposing that the cop has even average experience, his ability to be as certain as your argument shows you to be is considerably questionable.

To argue that someone could tell the difference expects more than should be assumed the average person capable of, and weakens the argument that the force used was excessive.

If I, as an average person, think my life is at risk, using lethal force is not excessive.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Anyone in law enforcement for any appreciable amount of time will have a higher than average exposure to dog and in all likelihood guard/watch dogs.

I finally broke down and watched the video. I had been avoiding it because frankly I don't need to see a dog get shot.

What I see is an officer who immediately goes for his gun, doesn't appear to be taking any quick action to remove themselves from any potential danger and a behavior from the dog that is typical of a hyperactive dog, not an aggressive dog.

The cop over reacted IMHO.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Aizle wrote:
Anyone in law enforcement for any appreciable amount of time will have a higher than average exposure to dog and in all likelihood guard/watch dogs.

I'd sure like to know what that opinion is based on...even if we knew how long the cop was on the force, I'd say that because the average US population density is 87.4 people per square mile, the average cop doesn't have all that much experience. Since Oklahoma has an average population density of 54.7 people per square mile, I'd put the cop in question at less than average experience.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group