Nitefox wrote:
I'll give you one that I brought up a few weeks ago...and this really plays into the whole character issue.
He lied about his mother and her insurance issues. Lied, Aizle. Plain ole non-truth, fib, fabrication, pants on fire lied. He was pushing this huge healthcare issue that the majority of America did not want. Did it without all the transparency he promised(we have to pass it so we can find out what's in it). This huge, huge issue that will change the face of insurance and healthcare, not to mention the effect it is going to have on the economy, was sold to you, me and America(who again, as a majority did not want this) on a lie. A lie using his own mother at that if such make a difference to you.
That's high character to you? That's the kind of person you think should lead this country? That's who you feel is a good leader?
What's that old cliche we bring up about people who we view as shady? "He'd sell his own mother..." Don't know about you and your circle Aizle but someone gets that kind of rep, their character isn't something to be thought of highly.
I get you Aizle. You and I are pretty much the two sides of the same coin. Had you just said "He's very liberal, that's where my bread is buttered, four more years baby". I'd have been alright. But you say you voted based on his character? I'd be looking for a way out of that praise.
Yeah, except that it seems that he didn't lie.
http://eba.benefitnews.com/news/health- ... 615-1.htmlQuote:
"This personal history of the President's speaks powerfully to the impact of preexisting condition limits on insurance protection from health care costs," White House spokesman Nicholas Papas said in an emailed statement on Friday.
The anecdote described a mother battling cancer only to have insurance companies insist she was ineligible for coverage because of a preexisting condition.
However Scott, who took a leave from the New York Times to write the book, said her research found that letters written in 1995 by Durham indicated most of her expenses were covered through her primary insurance provider and that the dispute arose from a supplementary disability claim to cover the cost of her deductible.
"As Ms. Scott's account makes clear, the President's mother incurred several hundred dollars in monthly uncovered medical expenses that she was relying on insurance to pay," Papas said.
"She first could not get a response from the insurance company, then was refused coverage."
Was there word smithing and spin on his comments? Sure, he's a politician to expect otherwise is silly.
And no, I really don't think that you do get me. You never have, and I suspect never will.