RangerDave wrote:
You want to talk character - the people who lack it are the ones who are so hell-bent on hating this guy that they feel the need to nit-pick his choice of language when describing what he and his family were dealing with when his mother was in the final stages of cancer. I mean seriously - who gives a sh*t if it was "disability insurance" or "health insurance"?
If someone uses their mother's death from cancer to push their political agenda, I'd say that goes directly to character.
If someone uses their mother's death from cancer to push their political agenda and deliberately doesn't tell the whole story because the whole story wouldn't be germane to the agenda they're pushing, that goes directly to questionable character.
I've never understood the whole idea that people with pre-existing conditions should expect to get
insurance.The whole idea of
insurance is that you pay in on the chance that you may need it, and those premiums if invested over a long enough period of time, as well as the profits from other people's invested premiums pay for your expenses. The concept of
insurance doesn't work if you only need to start paying for it after you've got an illness.
The same goes for disability, even more so. Should I be able to get disability insurance that pays my deductibles and living expenses after I get into a car accident that leaves me with the mental capacity of a 3 year old? Foolishness.
I could, however, get behind a transfer of insured status, once you obtain it, so you don't lose your status when you change carriers
_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko