Hmm, I must've misread something... I thought there was more to it than just "going" to church...::edit::
Ah!
here's where I got that idea.
Quote:
Rowland said the idea was simple: get people who are not yet hardened criminals to become involved in positive programs — hundreds of free resources offered by some 104 churches in the region with 56 agreeing to help monitor first-time, nonviolent offenders. Under the program, pastors would report weekly to the chief and offenders in the program would bring a signed sheet to prove they attended church.
They would also have to answer some questions about the services, Rowland said. And the offenders who voluntarily choose church over jail get to pick the churches they attend. If they complete a year’s attendance, Rowland said, their criminal case would be dismissed.
Rowland said the goal is to produce "productive citizens."
Some critics say the program definitely crosses the line between church and state, with some minority religious groups shut out of participation because few mosques or synagogues exist in the area. And atheists would have no option, Rowland said, but to pick another alternative sentencing program.
Seems a bit more than "you can just pick any church and attend", but more "you have to meet regularly with the pastor and talk about the sermons". The line (bolded) from the police chief also seems to imply that in his opinion, Aethiests couldn't simply attend, but would have to pick jail/fines.
The earlier portion seems to imply that while you can choose a church, you can't choose *any* church, but rather one of the 56 churches who have agreed to work with the police.
I'd have to wait for more details to surface, but if I'm reading correctly from the article, it's not as open as "any church, and anyone can just go".