The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 10:03 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Corolinth wrote:
Dash wrote:
A public trial in absentia would be fine. I'm concerned that Dr Paul seems to think we can just find this guy like we did Timothy McVeigh. That to me sounds part delusional and part armchair quarterbacking.


We managed to find Saddam Hussein for a trial. That actually was war, too.



Even better, let's occupy Yemen to get him.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:15 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
TheRiov wrote:
I think the implication here (not saying I agree with it) is that he's effectively renounced his citizenship by committing treason, and is therefor not entitled to constitutional protections granted citizens.

That may be their argument, but there's no legal basis for it. You can't cease to be a citizen by committing crimes, not even heinous crimes and/or treason.

TheRiov wrote:
Perhaps he renounced his citizenship directly?

As far as I know, he did not. It's worth pointing out that you can't cease to be a citizen by simple declaration, even a public one. U.S. citizenship law don't work that way. You have to leave the U.S. and file an official affidavit of renunciation at a U.S. consulate. See also Terry Nichols. He actively tried to renounce his citizenship multiple times, but he never went through the official channels, so it didn't count.

The only thing that comes close to a loss of citizenship by declaration is the "Reed Amendment", but that only bars you from re-entry to the U.S. It doesn't technically affect your citizenship status, and it's literally never been enforced.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:21 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
More questions about whether or not Al-Awlaki was a traitor than the FEC ...

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:17 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Team America World Police.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:21 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
If this guy had been killed in the process of attacking some other legitimate target, well, **** him. However, it appears he was the target. While that's not acceptable, it's also not acceptable that he sit in another country and use his rights as an American citizen to shield himself while giving aid and comfort to an enemy. I'm not quite sure what should happen. Perhaps we could have an impeachment!

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:32 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Diamondeye wrote:
If this guy had been killed in the process of attacking some other legitimate target, well, **** him. However, it appears he was the target. While that's not acceptable, it's also not acceptable that he sit in another country and use his rights as an American citizen to shield himself while giving aid and comfort to an enemy. I'm not quite sure what should happen. Perhaps we could have an impeachment!


Elmo wrote:
1. Extradition
2. Letter of Marque
3. Trial in absentia


These seem to be a very reasonable option, really.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:42 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
If extradition was a reasonable option, why was it not already done?

I'm not sure what a letter of marque would have done to improve the situation

Trial in absentia I suppose would work, but frankly I'm more uncomfortable with trial in absentia than with just blowing his *** away.

I'm also going to point out that at this point, its rather late to use any of those options.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:04 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Letter of Marque: Hey Yemen we understand you're busy with your own ****. How about you let us send some people over there to arrest him and bring him back?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:29 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Mixed views on this.

I'd like to think their should have been a better way to deal with this guy. Why not send seal team six to arrest him and if he resists give him a bullet ala bin Laden.

I thought if you picked up weapons against your countrymen you lost you citizenship. We went over this with some bearded guy we caught in the early days of Afghanistan.

I'm not particularly tore up that this dirt bag is gone.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:39 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
John Walker Lindh? He didn't lose his citizenship. There is absolutely no means whatsoever to revoke citizenship, other than fraud in obtaining it in the first place.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:46 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Alright. Then my other two points stand. I really think we should have tried to capture him, but at the same time I'm having a hard time feeling sad that he's gone.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:52 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Rorinthas wrote:
Alright. Then my other two points stand. I really think we should have tried to capture him, but at the same time I'm having a hard time feeling sad that he's gone.


Seperate the assasination from the man they assasinated.

They killed a US citizen for alleged crimes with no trial.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
I think it's interesting how this is such a big deal because this guy was a U.S. citizen. Is that really important here? Should the president be allowed to order the assassination of anyone without trial? I don't believe that rights are only held by those who happen to have the proper citizenship.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
I think I was one of the few people here (maybe the only) who said Bin Laden shouldn't have been assassinated.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:51 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Rynar wrote:

Seperate the assasination from the man they assasinated.

They killed a US citizen for alleged crimes with no trial.


I'm trying, hence the whole "I have mixed feelings about this." It's kind of like when the WBC does stupid stuff and they force me to defend them.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:58 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Wait, wait, wait... You've felt yourself inclined to defend the Westboro Baptist Church before?

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Ooo there is a secret memo! What could possibly be in the memo though?

Obama: Dear DoJ, can we whack Aulaqi? Check yes or no.
DoJ: Sure lol

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html

Quote:
Secret U.S. memo sanctioned killing of Aulaqi

The Justice Department wrote a secret memorandum authorizing the lethal targeting of Anwar al-Aulaqi, the American-born radical cleric who was killed by a U.S. drone strike Friday, according to administration officials.

The document was produced following a review of the legal issues raised by striking a U.S. citizen and involved senior lawyers from across the administration. There was no dissent about the legality of killing Aulaqi, the officials said.

“What constitutes due process in this case is a due process in war,” said one of the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss closely held deliberations within the administration…

“As a general matter, it would be entirely lawful for the United States to target high-level leaders of enemy forces, regardless of their nationality, who are plotting to kill Americans both under the authority provided by Congress in its use of military force in the armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces as well as established international law that recognizes our right of self-defense,” an administration official said in a statement Friday.



Ron Paul has also suggested impeachment would be possible.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:44 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Oh wow the DoJ gave him permission - well that's great except by the Constitution they cannot override an individual's rights either. Just like they couldn't do a lot of the things they claimed they could under Bush when the Supreme Court smacked the ever living **** out of them.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
What I find kind of disturbing is that noone seems to care about the people who died in the car with him. They killed the guy who programs AQ's website, who was also an American.....can you even get death for that if you're convicted of it in an actual court?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 111
One thing is certain: his days of plotting attacks that kill Americans are over. That works for me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Quote:
“As a general matter, it would be entirely lawful for the United States to target high-level leaders of enemy forces, regardless of their nationality, who are plotting to kill Americans both under the authority provided by Congress in its use of military force in the armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces as well as established international law that recognizes our right of self-defense,” an administration official said in a statement Friday.


I'm down with that.

Quote:
A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment. The administration officials refused to disclose the exact legal analysis used to authorize targeting Aulaqi, or how they considered any Fifth Amendment right to due process.


Why so secret?

Quote:
Robert Chesney, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin who specializes in national security law, said the government likely reviewed Aulaqi’s constitutional rights, but concluded that he was an imminent threat and was deliberately hiding in a place where neither the United States nor Yemen could realistically capture him.


Sounds reasonable to me but then the question becomes the definition of "imminent threat"

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:11 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
How was writings being published on Al Qaeda's site an "imminent threat"? I guess he also doesn't have the right to free speech?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:27 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
I'm surprised no one else read the FEC ruling last week ...

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Paul on Al-Awlaki
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:27 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094


nailed it

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:09 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
The 5th amendment says no 'person', so wouldnt it and this argument also apply to Osama bin Laden for example?

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 290 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group