The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 6:51 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » The Glade » Hellfire

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Nitefox
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:11 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Gingrich has a few too many things in his past I think. Plus his affairs and divorce and all that would hurt him with the social conservatives. I would love however to see him in a debate with Obama. He would murder him.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Rynar
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:17 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Diamondeye wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
I'm noticing a pattern here. Newt is surging to the top of the polls, so all the dirt and hit pieces are starting to come out. Happend with Perry, just happend with Cain. It's almost like the MSM wants RINO Mitt to be the GOP nomination.

Hannibal wrote:
The dems would welcome Romney because it would shift the discussion window to the left on so many of their goals.

Guys, do you have any idea how much liberals/Dems/Obama would love to have Cain or Gingrich as the Republican nominee? I grant that Perry could be a threat, but Cain and Gingrich? Precisely zero chance of winning the general election.


Are you smoking crack? Perry is the only one that Obama could easily just steamroll over after some of his antics. Cain or Gingrich would be a serious threat.


He would also steam-roll Romney, but for different reasons. Regardless of Romney's debate performance, he wouldn't be able to turn out a large enough percentage of conservatives and libertarians.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Talya
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 2:58 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Children used to have to contribute much more to a family's welfare at a much younger age. I think as a general rule society is too soft on kids these days.

Of course, there are exceptions to this. It used to be two kids could beat the **** out of each other in the schoolyard and not get anything more than detention. Now thy face expulsion and criminal charges. So...yeah. Everything's gone topsy-turvy.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me
█ ♣ █
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Diamondeye
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:46 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Nitefox wrote:
Gingrich has a few too many things in his past I think. Plus his affairs and divorce and all that would hurt him with the social conservatives. I would love however to see him in a debate with Obama. He would murder him.


People overestimate the willingness of social conservatives to reject a candidate they otherwise agree with over perceived issues. Despite John Kerry's efforts, Mary Cheney didn't cause them to stay home in 2004.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Sam
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:08 am
Posts: 906
Talya wrote:
Children used to have to contribute much more to a family's welfare at a much younger age. I think as a general rule society is too soft on kids these days.

Of course, there are exceptions to this. It used to be two kids could beat the **** out of each other in the schoolyard and not get anything more than detention. Now thy face expulsion and criminal charges. So...yeah. Everything's gone topsy-turvy.


Yeah, but we just beat the **** out of each other and then went our way either as champion, or defeated.

Today, the little shits bring guns or get pissed and go blow up a building.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Rorinthas
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:22 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Any misgivings over newt are in a Newt vs. Other republicans scenario not in a Newt vs. Obama scenario. I think I lot of republicans are either holding fast to their favored guy (as evidenced by Paul and Romney's unwavering numbers) or still looking for their favored guy (as evidenced by the ebb and flow going from Perry to Cain to Newt.) I think in the end, as things start to settle down and people drop out of the race you'll see more falling in line to a point.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Rynar
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:17 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Rorinthas wrote:
Any misgivings over newt are in a Newt vs. Other republicans scenario not in a Newt vs. Obama scenario. I think I lot of republicans are either holding fast to their favored guy (as evidenced by Paul and Romney's unwavering numbers) or still looking for their favored guy (as evidenced by the ebb and flow going from Perry to Cain to Newt.) I think in the end, as things start to settle down and people drop out of the race you'll see more falling in line to a point.


If Paul isn't the nomination I'm voting Obama to speed the process.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Rorinthas
 Post subject: Child Labor & Newt
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:16 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
It's your vote and if you are comfortable doing that, then you are the one who has to deal with that. Personally I wouldn't want any stake in the ruin he's causing. I feel bad enough having stake in the ruin GWB caused and he had at least a couple good things to level that out.

Mainly I was commenting on how I analyze the polls being taken.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » The Glade » Hellfire

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 367 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group