The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 7:50 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:18 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/bills-would-make-olympic-medals-tax-exempt/2012/08/01/gJQA1uF8PX_blog.html

Apparently there is a bill trying to be passed that would stop medalists from being taxed on their winnings, which includes the current tax for the value of the metal in the medal itself.

It never occurred to me that they would be taxed on their medals to begin with, let alone any monies they won.

Quote:
Did you know that U.S. athletes owe taxes any time they win a medal? Republican lawmakers — clearly seizing on Olympic fever and general displeasure with the tax code — want to change that.

After winning gold in London, an Olympic athlete also stands to earn a $25,000 honorarium. Silver medalists receive $15,000 and bronze medalists are slated to leave London with a $10,000 payday. Current U.S. tax law requires athletes to add the value of medals and honorariums to their taxable income — just as any winning game show contestant would have to pay taxes on a new car or toaster oven.

But Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Tex.) introduced legislation Wednesday that would exempt American medal-winning gymnasts, rhythmic gymnasts, swimmers, divers, synchronized divers, runners, cyclists or water polo players from paying taxes on their Olympic winnings.

Farenthold, who calls his bill the Tax Exemptions for American Medalists Act — or TEAM Act — said his measure “will remove another needless tax on the exceptional American athletes who represent our nation on the world’s stage. Our Olympic athletes embody the American spirit and give hope to all who watch them compete on behalf of the red, white and blue.”

In touting his Olympic Tax Elimination Act, Rubio called the tax code “a complicated and burdensome mess that too often punishes success.” He said imposing taxes on Olympic athletes “is a classic example of this madness” and that they “shouldn’t have to worry about an extra tax bill waiting for them back home.”

The legislation comes in response to a study by Americans for Tax Reform, led by anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, that estimated that Americans medal winners would face a top income tax rate of 35 percent. The rate was calculated by adding the honorarium to the estimated price of the medal. Current commodity prices value a gold medal at roughly $675, a silver medal at about $382 and a bronze medal at under $5, according to ATR.

While the bills may earn favorable political support, the legislation won’t be considered until after the month-long August recess, long after most Americans stop caring about the Olympics.

And remember — any medal-earning athlete who scores an endorsement deal will still need to pay taxes on those earnings.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
*sigh* Yet another Republican policy aimed at helping the top 0.1%. A more just approach would be to tax those medalists more and use the proceeds to help athletes who didn't even qualify for the Olympics pay for some extra training. Otherwise, the gap between medalists and non-medalists is just going to keep growing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:40 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Apparently, we are the only country that does this.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:40 am 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
RangerDave wrote:
*sigh* Yet another Republican policy aimed at helping the top 0.1%. A more just approach would be to tax those medalists more and use the proceeds to help athletes who didn't even qualify for the Olympics pay for some extra training. Otherwise, the gap between medalists and non-medalists is just going to keep growing.



Yeah my internet sarcasm meter finally worked!

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
It should only be tax free if they win the gold.

Run faster, *****.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:52 am 
Offline
The Reason
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:39 pm
Posts: 859
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
It should only be tax free if they win the gold.

Run faster, *****.


:lol: :thumbs:

_________________
"None is more important, none more legitimate, than that of rendering the people safe as they are the
ultimate guardians of their own liberty."-
Thomas Jefferson

"Yeah, I'm rehearsing my poker face. I don't handle stupid well. *sigh*" - Farsky


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:16 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Uncle Fester wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
*sigh* Yet another Republican policy aimed at helping the top 0.1%. A more just approach would be to tax those medalists more and use the proceeds to help athletes who didn't even qualify for the Olympics pay for some extra training. Otherwise, the gap between medalists and non-medalists is just going to keep growing.



Yeah my internet sarcasm meter finally worked!


/sigh Mine was broken... I read RDs post and said "Dude really?"

/WTS easily repaired Sarcasm detector

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:17 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Funny, I read RD's post and recognized the guiding philosophy for most Democrats and their supporters, right down to demonizing the Republican party.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
Eh, seems to me this would only make the tax code more complicated, not less complicated. I mean, I understand the sentiment, but it seems silly to start making exceptions for everyone who "deserves" their money or whatever.

Not to mention it's just a waste of time. I'm sure it will cost far more to debate this bill, pass it, and implement it than it would save the athletes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Why only those sports?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:52 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
First of all, I think it's pretty stupid to tax olympians on their winnings when they're representing our country to the world... Secondly, why do the judo practitioners, marksmen, archers, volleyball players, etc., get **** sideways on this deal? Their sports are just as valid.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: Mook's Pimp Skittle Stable
Because who the **** cares about fencing, right?

(and for the sarcasm-detector deficient: /sarcasm off)

_________________
Darksiege: You are not a god damned vulcan homie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Elmarnieh wrote:
Why only those sports?

Because they did it for the country comrade!

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:29 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
The way I read it, those were examples of sports where the U.S. commonly wins medals, not that only those sports would get exemptions.

As for the actual tax, not taxing Olympians would have a trivial effect on the complexity of the tax code. I don't have a problem with taxation on the cash winnings; when added into their total income most athletes are probably not rich enough that they really get taxed on that much of it anyhow after their accountant gets to work.

Taxing them on the value of the medal, on the other hand, is dirty and cheap. That ought to be fixed

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Anything but a flat tax is simply pandering to one group or another. If taxing is supposed to be about revenue, than it should be fairly level. We shouldn't be singling out Olympians. If I went on The Price is Right and won a $40,000 car, i'd be taxed on the value.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Last edited by Rorinthas on Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Diamondeye wrote:
The way I read it, those were examples of sports where the U.S. commonly wins medals, not that only those sports would get exemptions.


But we commonly win medals in everything. The U.S. has more total medals than the second and third place countries (Soviets and Germans) combined.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:39 pm 
Offline
The artist formerly known as Raber
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 618
Location: WA state
Tax the cash winnings? - Yes, it's income.
Tax the value of the medal? - **** off, government.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:43 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Lenas wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
The way I read it, those were examples of sports where the U.S. commonly wins medals, not that only those sports would get exemptions.


But we commonly win medals in everything. The U.S. has more total medals than the second and third place countries (Soviets and Germans) combined.


Hence my use of the term "examples".

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
You're right, it's just a poorly written article. Here's the bill: http://farenthold.house.gov/images/stor ... d_Bill.pdf


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Lenas wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
The way I read it, those were examples of sports where the U.S. commonly wins medals, not that only those sports would get exemptions.


But we commonly win medals in everything. The U.S. has more total medals than the second and third place countries (Soviets and Germans) combined.


Wow. I never knew that Norway OWNS the winter Olympics.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:49 pm
Posts: 3455
Location: St. Louis, MO
How could you not figure that? There's an event basically named "Here's medals for Norway".

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:15 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Lenas wrote:
But we commonly win medals in everything. The U.S. has more total medals than the second and third place countries (Soviets and Germans) combined.
Notice that the Soviet Union, which now no longer exists, has 1,000 medals in 9 Olympic games. The United States does well, but much of their success is based on having sent athletes to all but one Olympiad. Several countries average more medals per Olympiad.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
IMO an average of ~38 golds per Olympiad spread over 25 appearances is a bit more impressive than ~44 golds avg. over 9 appearances.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Corolinth wrote:
Lenas wrote:
But we commonly win medals in everything. The U.S. has more total medals than the second and third place countries (Soviets and Germans) combined.
Notice that the Soviet Union, which now no longer exists, has 1,000 medals in 9 Olympic games. The United States does well, but much of their success is based on having sent athletes to all but one Olympiad. Several countries average more medals per Olympiad.

We call that "stamina."

As for Norway -- well, yeah. They have the unfair advantage of warping space and time (or just climate or geography, take your pick) to gain a training schedule advantage on basically every other nation in the world. What did you expect? That's like being surprised that desert countries in Africa produce all the fast runners. When your entire country is a natural track and filled with warlords who want to kill you...

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:43 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
shuyung wrote:
How could you not figure that? There's an event basically named "Here's medals for Norway".


Its mostly because the Winter Olympics are: Skating, Sledding and Skiing.

And they're all variations on those three themes.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 238 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group