Corolinth wrote:
On the topic of paying taxes vs not paying taxes, you must also consider where money comes from.
Consider, for example, a public school teacher. On paper, it looks like they pay taxes. All of their income is received from tax dollars, so all they're really doing is deferring a part of their total compensation until the next year. Postal workers are another example. On paper, they appear to pay taxes. They are paid in tax dollars.
Any group that is paid out of the public coffers does not pay taxes. We simply have them fill out IRS returns so that they can feel like they've paid their dues. Make no mistake, these groups do not pay taxes. They receive taxes. Presumably, they receive tax money for performing some valuable function, so they do make a contribution to society, but it is not monetary.
Just to clarify, the Postal Service no longer receives a significant portion of its income from the government:
Wikipedia wrote:
The USPS has not directly received taxpayer-dollars since the early 1980s with the minor exception of subsidies for costs associated with the disabled and overseas voters.
Its
Annual Report shows a $3B contribution from the US Government, out of an operating revenue of $65B. Maybe you're thinking of some other way to categorize how they get paid - guaranteed monopoly on first-class mail, etc. - but the USPS is no longer a taxpayer-funded organization, for the most part.
It absolutely is tax-payer funded, but the taxes that fund it are largely voluntary rather than income based. It's a government created, managed, and imposed monopoly on service just as national defense is a government created, managed, and imposed monopoly on service. Just because the coinciding tax is consumption based rather than confiscatory doesn't mean it's not a tax.