The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 7:04 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
RangerDave wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
So it's better for Steve and Bob to be able to get married than for either of them to have a job to support each other?

Which do you value more - your job or your marriage?


They aren't the same.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
To be fair to Farsky, if that's the only visible difference between the candidates, then good or not, it's the only way to make your decision.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:31 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Nitefox wrote:
FarSky wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
FarSky wrote:
If there were any chance Republicans would be more fiscally responsible than Democrats, that might mean something.

So your counter-argument is that government spending is destroying the economy?

I'm saying that there are two spheres to political parties: their economic opinions and their social opinions. I find both candidates' economic opinions untrustworthy and untenable. So judging them by those guidelines, I find them to be a wash. Which leaves me with judging them by their social views. I find the Republicans' to be completely vile, and the Democrats' to be far more palatable.



So it's better for Steve and Bob to be able to get married than for either of them to have a job to support each other?

Ideally, I'd like for both to happen. But the Republicans won't pull their heads out of their asses (which, you have to admit...is kinda gay) on social issues. And Republicans have shown no ability to do anything whatsoever that would actually fix the economy. So since neither are going to get Steve and Bob back to work, at least let 'em be married while they're in poverty.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
But Obama hasn't done **** for gay marriage in four years.

So wait... both parties lie about their economic policies AND their social policies???

Stop the presses the D's and R's have both been force feeding us LIARS!

#TimeForANewConstitutionalConvention

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Last edited by Hopwin on Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:33 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Diamondeye wrote:
To be fair to Farsky, if that's the only visible difference between the candidates, then good or not, it's the only way to make your decision.



To be fair to Farsky, if that's the only thing he can see then I don't think he is looking hard enough. But...I guess it really doesn't matter. A huge chunk of the population is basing their vote on skin color, that's about as pathetic as basing your vote on who has sex with who I guess.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Hopwin wrote:
But Obama hasn't done **** for gay marriage in four years.

So wait... both parties lie about their economic policies AND their social policies???

Stop the presses the D's and R's have both been force feeding us LIARS!

#TimeForANewConstitutionalConvention

Nitefox is the one who suddenly narrowed the discussion to a gay marriage strawman-on-man. It's readily apparent that while neither is perfect, progressives are far more progressive on social issues than conservatives (because...duh). You pays your money and you takes your chances.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:36 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
FarSky wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
But Obama hasn't done **** for gay marriage in four years.

So wait... both parties lie about their economic policies AND their social policies???

Stop the presses the D's and R's have both been force feeding us LIARS!

#TimeForANewConstitutionalConvention

Nitefox is the one who suddenly narrowed the discussion to a gay marriage strawman-on-man.



I brought up one main social issue that is talked about on these boards, sue me for cutting to the chase.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:37 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Progressive is not necessarily progress, nor good. (Nor am I talking about gay marriage)

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Diamondeye wrote:
More like, you start with the observation (not assumption) that systemic racism/racial bias has been irrelevant or nonexistant for about 20 years, having been eradictaed over the previous 20....

I'm glad you agree that this is the starting point of the right's analysis of racial issues (though I would note that 20 years ago - i.e. 1992 - conservatives were saying that systemic racism had already been dead and gone for about 20 years at that point). That aside, on what basis do you call it an "observation" rather than an assumption when the vast bulk of the studies and surveys on the subject point in the other direction?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
FarSky wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
But Obama hasn't done **** for gay marriage in four years.

So wait... both parties lie about their economic policies AND their social policies???

Stop the presses the D's and R's have both been force feeding us LIARS!

#TimeForANewConstitutionalConvention

progressives are far more progressive on social issues than conservatives (because...duh).

What makes you say that?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:46 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Hopwin wrote:
FarSky wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
But Obama hasn't done **** for gay marriage in four years.

So wait... both parties lie about their economic policies AND their social policies???

Stop the presses the D's and R's have both been force feeding us LIARS!

#TimeForANewConstitutionalConvention

progressives are far more progressive on social issues than conservatives (because...duh).

What makes you say that?



My guess would be Comedy Central.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
So it's better for Steve and Bob to be able to get married than for either of them to have a job to support each other?

Which do you value more - your job or your marriage the government-issued piece of paper "approving" your marriage?


FIFY


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:03 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
So long as government systems are set up to reward people who claim institutional racism still exists - there will always be a large contingent of professionals and experts whose income depends on those rewards who will always claim it exists.

The only way to kill racism is to not have laws that contain any references to race.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Nitefox wrote:
FarSky wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
FarSky wrote:
If there were any chance Republicans would be more fiscally responsible than Democrats, that might mean something.

So your counter-argument is that government spending is destroying the economy?

I'm saying that there are two spheres to political parties: their economic opinions and their social opinions. I find both candidates' economic opinions untrustworthy and untenable. So judging them by those guidelines, I find them to be a wash. Which leaves me with judging them by their social views. I find the Republicans' to be completely vile, and the Democrats' to be far more palatable.



So it's better for Steve and Bob to be able to get married than for either of them to have a job to support each other?


No. Its better for Steve and Bob to get married than not.

Under either pres, they won't have jobs. So erring on the side of increased social freedoms (whether I partake of them or not) is the right thing to do.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Müs wrote:
No. Its better for Steve and Bob to get married than not.

Under either pres, they won't have jobs. So erring on the side of increased social freedoms (whether I partake of them or not) is the right thing to do.

If Obama had any interest in making it legal for gays to marry why didn't he do it already?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Nitefox wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
To be fair to Farsky, if that's the only visible difference between the candidates, then good or not, it's the only way to make your decision.



To be fair to Farsky, if that's the only thing he can see then I don't think he is looking hard enough. But...I guess it really doesn't matter. A huge chunk of the population is basing their vote on skin color, that's about as pathetic as basing your vote on who has sex with who I guess.


Its not just that single issue.

I believe that Romney will be worse overall for social policies and equally as bad as Obama for economic issues.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
I'm still waiting to hear Nitefox's answer to my question.

Also, no where in that video clip does Obama actually mention race. He only compares the government's responses between 3 major disasters in recent memory.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Hopwin wrote:
Müs wrote:
No. Its better for Steve and Bob to get married than not.

Under either pres, they won't have jobs. So erring on the side of increased social freedoms (whether I partake of them or not) is the right thing to do.

If Obama had any interest in making it legal for gays to marry why didn't he do it already?


Because congress won't pass it. The president doesn't have the power you seem to think he does.

However, what Obama has done is not pursue an agenda *against* gay marriage. Its a subtle but important difference.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:43 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
I'm still waiting to hear Nitefox's answer to my question.

Also, no where in that video clip does Obama actually mention race. He only compares the government's responses between 3 major disasters in recent memory.



That was directed at me? Did I make a statement that I found something objectionable? All I did was say this can't be good for him.

Put down the Obama pom-poms for a second and look at this video, what he had to say, who he was talking about, the way he went about it...and tell me with a straight face that you don't think it's that big a deal.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
how about during the two years the drms had total majorities? he could have done something then. oh wait he had not yet evolved!

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:46 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Uncle Fester wrote:
how about during the two years the drms had total majorities? he could have done something then. oh wait he had not yet evolved!



Biden had to evolve for him. All these folks worshiping at The One's feet are fooling themselves if they thinks Obama would have come out with that on his own.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:49 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Nitefox wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
how about during the two years the drms had total majorities? he could have done something then. oh wait he had not yet evolved!



Biden had to evolve for him. All these folks worshiping at The One's feet are fooling themselves if he thinks Obama would have come out with that on his own.

I'll take ineffectual hope over blind idealogical opposition any day.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
FarSky wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
how about during the two years the drms had total majorities? he could have done something then. oh wait he had not yet evolved!



Biden had to evolve for him. All these folks worshiping at The One's feet are fooling themselves if he thinks Obama would have come out with that on his own.

I'll take ineffectual hope over blind idealogical opposition any day.



Ohhhh...so you watch Comedy Central and your eyes are open to make informed choices...but I post links to real journalist that link to real facts and I'm the blind one...Got ya chief.

Keep hoping FarSky...you've already got a job so don't need to worry about the economy. Bob and Steve need a piece of paper!!

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Müs wrote:

Because congress won't pass it. The president doesn't have the power you seem to think he does.

However, what Obama has done is not pursue an agenda *against* gay marriage. Its a subtle but important difference.

So if POTUS can't make it legal and cannot prevent States from making it legal so what relevance this have to anything?

I am voting for Gary Johnson because he is not anti-Cleveland Browns.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Last edited by Hopwin on Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:55 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Nitefox wrote:
FarSky wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
how about during the two years the drms had total majorities? he could have done something then. oh wait he had not yet evolved!



Biden had to evolve for him. All these folks worshiping at The One's feet are fooling themselves if he thinks Obama would have come out with that on his own.

I'll take ineffectual hope over blind idealogical opposition any day.



Ohhhh...so you watch Comedy Central and your eyes are open to make informed choices...but I post links to real journalist that link to real facts and I'm the blind one...Got ya chief.

Keep hoping FarSky...you've already got a job so don't need to worry about the economy. Bob and Steve need a piece of paper!!

What the ever-lovin' **** are you talking about?


Last edited by FarSky on Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 248 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group