The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:31 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 707 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 29  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:52 am 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
My god are even the palace guard comedians turning on the president?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ... From-Media

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:02 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Uncle Fester wrote:
My god are even the palace guard comedians turning on the president?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ... From-Media



Jon Stewart is a political comedian. He thrives on stupidity in government. When asked if he was happy that Bush's term in office was up, he implied that Bush had been a goldmine for comedians, and would be a hard act to follow for his successor. It shouldn't surprise anyone that he goes after amusing gaffes by Obama's administration.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:18 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Does this count?

Supreme Court says you can violate a patent by planting a seed


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:18 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Talya wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
My god are even the palace guard comedians turning on the president?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ... From-Media



Jon Stewart is a political comedian. He thrives on stupidity in government. When asked if he was happy that Bush's term in office was up, he implied that Bush had been a goldmine for comedians, and would be a hard act to follow for his successor. It shouldn't surprise anyone that he goes after amusing gaffes by Obama's administration.

Except that for the past 5 years he has not gone after those gaffes.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:27 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Talya wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
My god are even the palace guard comedians turning on the president?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ... From-Media



Jon Stewart is a political comedian. He thrives on stupidity in government. When asked if he was happy that Bush's term in office was up, he implied that Bush had been a goldmine for comedians, and would be a hard act to follow for his successor. It shouldn't surprise anyone that he goes after amusing gaffes by Obama's administration.


That's true. It doesn't make him NOT a B.O. knob-slobberer.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:33 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
DFK! wrote:
It should be noted that when the in-car radio was invented, it was protested as being distracting and dangerous.


They are.. a little. Not enough to be a problem. Texting while driving is a major hazard. Talking on the phone while driving is somewhere in between. The reason the radio is a minor hazard is that except for the sort of idiot that constantly channel-surfs, you don't spend much time actually operating it.

Quote:
Texting while driving is also illegal here.

There's got to be a line, though. "Distracted driving," I believe they call it. Does having two screaming toddlers in the back seat count? It does a hell of a lot more to distract the driver than talking on a mobile phone, and yet the latter is illegal here, the former is not. How much legislation do we really need?


Talking on a phone is not less distracting that toddlers. Toddlers are annoying when screaming, but you don't have to actually do anything; they can just sit there and fuss. Talking requires you to pay attention to what's being said to you and what you're saying. Texting is worse because you have to look at the screen, and not just a quick glance; you have to stare at it.

That's where the line is - is the distraction momentary (as in one or two seconds) or continuous, does it take the eyes off the road, does it require driver interaction, and is it something that the driver necessarily needs to do in order for the vehicle to be useful? If you can't take toddlers in the car, what good is it? conversely, you pretty much never NEED to text while driving.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:43 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Uncle Fester wrote:
My god are even the palace guard comedians turning on the president?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ... From-Media

Also it is interesting that Stewart's criticism is not that what O did was wrong per se, but rather that it gives ammo to conspiracy nuts.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Diamondeye wrote:
Talking on a phone is not less distracting that toddlers. Toddlers are annoying when screaming, but you don't have to actually do anything; they can just sit there and fuss. Talking requires you to pay attention to what's being said to you and what you're saying. Texting is worse because you have to look at the screen, and not just a quick glance; you have to stare at it.

That's where the line is - is the distraction momentary (as in one or two seconds) or continuous, does it take the eyes off the road, does it require driver interaction, and is it something that the driver necessarily needs to do in order for the vehicle to be useful? If you can't take toddlers in the car, what good is it? conversely, you pretty much never NEED to text while driving.


And yet, apparently, studies have shown that having a conversation while driving is equally distracting and dangerous, regardless of whether you're holding a phone to your ear, using a handsfree bluetooth link through your car, or talking to a passenger in the car. So why are we picking on some types of distraction and not others?

(I picked "screaming toddlers" because parents, and especially mothers, seem genetically programmed to being made distraught by the sound of very young children crying. Personally, it very well may be the most distracting sound I've ever heard. It's difficult to think of anything else while a child is crying.)

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:47 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
What studies would those be?

The factors I listed are what increase the degree of distraction. They aren't important because they're different types; they're important because they increase the degree by adding more components or time. A study that claims a momentary, minor distraction, or one that doesn't divert the driver's attention from the road is just as dangerous as one that completely takes their attention off driving is just flat wrong.

You pretty much have to have passengers in a car, and there's no way to stop people talking to them. We can make reasonable efforts to get people not to talk on the phone. There's no reason we should avoid "picking on" certain kinds of distraction. We don't need to be "all or nothing".

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:51 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Diamondeye wrote:
What studies would those be?



I'd heard them before on the news. Conveniently, when I searched, wiki links the studies in its sources..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_pho ... ree_device

Quote:
Handsfree device
Driving while using a handsfree cellular device is not safer than using a hand held cell phone, as concluded by case-crossover studies.[19][20] epidemiological,[1][2] simulation,[9] and meta-analysis.[11][12] The increased cognitive workload involved in holding a conversation, not the use of hands, causes the increased risk.[21][22][23] For example, a Carnegie Mellon University study found that merely listening to somebody speak on a phone caused a 37% drop in activity in the parietal lobe, where spatial tasks are managed.[24] The consistency of increased crash risk between hands-free and hand held cell phone use is at odds with legislation in many locations that prohibits hand held cell phone use but allows hands-free.



Note that this also means a conversation with a passenger would pose the same risk.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:59 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
They're wrong - not in the sense of the mental effort, but of the decrease in safety.

If you have a hand off the steering wheel, you're less in control of the vehicle. In some situations (basically any time you don't need to maneuver more than a lane change) this doesn't matter, but if you have any sort of need to turn or suddenly maneuver, you're in far less control of the vehicle.

This technically doesn't mean the driver is more mentally distracted, but it does reduce their overall ability to respond to driving conditions.

As for the handsfree thing, there's no point in regulating it. How would you ever tell if someone was using one while driving? It's no more practical or reasonable than trying to prevent people from taking kids in the car or talking to a passenger. People using the phone in their hand can be seen doing it.

There's also the fact that while talking on the phone doesn't take more attention than talking on handsfree, dialing does. Voice dialing, on the other hand, does not take the eyes off the road. Again, if these people say that taking your eyes off the road, especially for more than a momentary glance, is not more dangerous than other types of distraction, they're on crack.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:07 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
A conversation with a person in the car will often stop during high traffic concentrations, and I suspect having another set of eyes in the car along with a conversation partner decreases some of the risks of accidents (driver less likely to nod off, alerted to potential hazard)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:40 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
I keep reading this thread title as "Your Daily Dose of Tranny".

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Stathol wrote:
I keep reading this thread title as "Your Daily Dose of Tranny".

THANK YOU!!! I figured I was the only one who read it that way.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:46 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Perverts.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:50 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Diamondeye wrote:
There's also the fact that while talking on the phone doesn't take more attention than talking on handsfree, dialing does. Voice dialing, on the other hand, does not take the eyes off the road. Again, if these people say that taking your eyes off the road, especially for more than a momentary glance, is not more dangerous than other types of distraction, they're on crack.
Primary cause of motor vehicle accidents in the United States: distracted driving. Primary cause of driver distraction in the United States: other passengers in the same vehicle.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Last edited by Khross on Wed May 15, 2013 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:51 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Not to mention tranny is hate speech these days. People get glitter thrown on them for being insufficiently supportive and tolerant of transgenders. I therefore move that Stathol and Dave have their avatars changed to very glitterrific ponies as punishment.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:59 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Corolinth wrote:
Not to mention tranny is hate speech these days. People get glitter thrown on them for being insufficiently supportive and tolerant of transgenders. I therefore move that Stathol and Dave have their avatars changed to very glitterrific ponies as punishment.


Solidarity!

Spoiler:
Image


Hesitant to actually change my avatar due to the collective aneurysm from some members ;)

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:01 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Just another element to hide.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
"Robin Hood" group sued over feeding expired parking meters


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:41 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
FarSky wrote:

Misleading synopsis Farsky
Quote:
The lawsuit does not deny group members' right to videotape and takes no issue with them filling expired parking meters, but said there is a concern that the three parking enforcement officers will quit. The suit states the city would suffer financially from having to hire and train new employees, and might have difficulty filling the positions.


per the article they're harassing the officers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:43 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
TheRiov wrote:
per the article they're harassing the officers.


The "harrassment" only involves attempting to get in front of the officers (I think they said at lest 20 feet in front) to prioritize parking meters in their current path.

That's called being effective, not harassment.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:45 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
In addition, since when did heckling become something you could sue over?

"Oh noes, they were mean to the parking attendant! Better shut them up."

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:46 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
It's basically a "he said, she said" argument right now:

Quote:
According to the suit, the residents "regularly, repeatedly and intentionally taunted, interfered with, harassed, and intimidated" the officers starting last December, "surrounding, touching or nearly touching, and otherwise taunting and harassing" the officers.


If anyone did those things to any of you during your work time, I can guarantee you'd be up in arms about it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:46 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
Quote:
According to the suit, the residents "regularly, repeatedly and intentionally taunted, interfered with, harassed, and intimidated" the officers starting last December, "surrounding, touching or nearly touching, and otherwise taunting and harassing" the officers.


Quote:
In the filing, parking enforcement officer Linda Desruisseaux said, "Besides following me, crowding around me, making video recordings of my activities, and placing coins in expired meters to prevent me from writing tickets, these individuals repeatedly taunt and harass me, asking why I am stealing peoples' money and telling me to get another job ... In particular, Graham Colson likes to taunt me by saying, 'Linda, guess what you're not going to do today - write tickets.' ... The taunting and harassment tends to get worse when there is a group, as they try to one-up each other at my expense."


Hostile work environment?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 707 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 29  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group